Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine , Liverpool, UK.
College of Health Science, School of Nursing, University of Nairobi , Nairobi, Kenya.
Glob Health Action. 2020 Dec 31;13(1):1819052. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1819052.
The 3-Delays Model has helped in the identification of access barriers to obstetric care in low and middle-income countries by highlighting the responsibilities at household, community and health system levels. Critiques of the Model include its one-dimensionality and its limited utility in triggering preventative interventions. Such limitations have prompted a review of the evidence to establish the usefulness of the Model in optimising timely access to intrapartum care.
To determine the current utility of the 3-Delays Model and its potential for supporting a solution-based approach to accessing intrapartum care.
We conducted a qualitative evidence synthesis across several databases and included qualitative findings from stand-alone studies, mixed-methods research and literature reviews using the Model to present their findings. Papers published between 1994 and 2019 were included with no language restrictions. Twenty-seven studies were quality appraised. Qualitative accounts were analysed using the 'best-fit framework approach'.
This synthesis included twenty-five studies conducted in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean. Five studies adhered to the original 3-Delays Model's structure by identifying the same factors responsible for the delays. The remaining studies proposed modifications to the Model including alterations of the delay's definition, adding of new factors explaining the delays, and inclusion of a fourth delay. Only two studies reported women's individual contributions to the delays. All studies applied the Model retrospectively, thus adopting a problem-identification approach.
This synthesis unveils the need for an individual perspective, for prospective identification of potential issues. This has resulted in the development of a new framework, the Women's Health Empowerment Model, incorporating the 3 delays. As a basis for discussion at every pregnancy, this framework promotes a solution-based approach to childbirth, which could prevent delays and support women's empowerment during pregnancy and childbirth.
3-延误模型通过突出家庭、社区和卫生系统各级的责任,有助于确定中低收入国家获得产科护理的障碍。该模型的批评包括其一维性及其在引发预防性干预方面的有限效用。这些局限性促使人们对证据进行审查,以确定该模型在优化及时获得分娩期护理方面的有用性。
确定 3-延误模型的当前效用及其在支持以解决方案为基础的分娩期护理获取方法方面的潜力。
我们在多个数据库中进行了定性证据综合,包括独立研究、混合方法研究和使用该模型呈现其研究结果的文献综述的定性发现。纳入了 1994 年至 2019 年期间发表的无语言限制的论文。对 27 项研究进行了质量评估。使用“最佳拟合框架方法”对定性描述进行了分析。
该综合研究包括在非洲、亚洲、拉丁美洲和加勒比地区进行的 25 项研究。五项研究通过确定导致延误的相同因素,遵循了 3-延误模型的原始结构。其余研究对模型进行了修改,包括修改延误的定义、添加新的解释延误的因素以及纳入第四个延误。只有两项研究报告了妇女对延误的个人贡献。所有研究都回顾性地应用了该模型,因此采用了问题识别方法。
该综合研究揭示了需要从个人角度出发,前瞻性地识别潜在问题。这导致了一个新框架的发展,即妇女健康赋权模型,纳入了 3 个延误。作为每次怀孕讨论的基础,该框架促进了一种以解决方案为基础的分娩方法,可以防止延误,并在怀孕期间和分娩期间支持妇女赋权。