Suppr超能文献

JTC 偏倚、精神病遗传易感性与妄想观念的复制研究。

A replication study of JTC bias, genetic liability for psychosis and delusional ideation.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2022 Jul;52(9):1777-1783. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720003578. Epub 2020 Oct 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study attempted to replicate whether a bias in probabilistic reasoning, or 'jumping to conclusions'(JTC) bias is associated with being a sibling of a patient with schizophrenia spectrum disorder; and if so, whether this association is contingent on subthreshold delusional ideation.

METHODS

Data were derived from the EUGEI project, a 25-centre, 15-country effort to study psychosis spectrum disorder. The current analyses included 1261 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder, 1282 siblings of patients and 1525 healthy comparison subjects, recruited in Spain (five centres), Turkey (three centres) and Serbia (one centre). The beads task was used to assess JTC bias. Lifetime experience of delusional ideation and hallucinatory experiences was assessed using the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences. General cognitive abilities were taken into account in the analyses.

RESULTS

JTC bias was positively associated not only with patient status but also with sibling status [adjusted relative risk (aRR) ratio : 4.23 CI 95% 3.46-5.17 for siblings and aRR: 5.07 CI 95% 4.13-6.23 for patients]. The association between JTC bias and sibling status was stronger in those with higher levels of delusional ideation (aRR interaction in siblings: 3.77 CI 95% 1.67-8.51, and in patients: 2.15 CI 95% 0.94-4.92). The association between JTC bias and sibling status was not stronger in those with higher levels of hallucinatory experiences.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings replicate earlier findings that JTC bias is associated with familial liability for psychosis and that this is contingent on the degree of delusional ideation but not hallucinations.

摘要

背景

本研究试图复制概率推理中的偏差,或“仓促结论”(JTC)偏差是否与精神分裂谱系障碍患者的兄弟姐妹有关;如果是,这种关联是否取决于亚阈值妄想观念。

方法

数据来自 EUGEI 项目,这是一个在 25 个中心、15 个国家进行的研究精神分裂谱系障碍的项目。目前的分析包括 1261 名精神分裂谱系障碍患者、1282 名患者的兄弟姐妹和 1525 名健康对照者,他们在西班牙(5 个中心)、土耳其(3 个中心)和塞尔维亚(1 个中心)招募。使用珠子任务评估 JTC 偏差。使用社区心理体验评估评估妄想观念和幻觉体验的终生经历。在分析中考虑了一般认知能力。

结果

JTC 偏差不仅与患者状况有关,而且与兄弟姐妹状况有关[调整后的相对风险(ARR)比:兄弟姐妹为 4.23 CI 95% 3.46-5.17,患者为 5.07 CI 95% 4.13-6.23]。在妄想观念水平较高的个体中,JTC 偏差与兄弟姐妹状况之间的关联更强(兄弟姐妹中的 ARR 交互作用:3.77 CI 95% 1.67-8.51,患者为 2.15 CI 95% 0.94-4.92)。在幻觉体验水平较高的个体中,JTC 偏差与兄弟姐妹状况之间的关联并不更强。

结论

这些发现复制了早期的发现,即 JTC 偏差与精神病的家族易感性有关,并且这种关联取决于妄想观念的程度,而与幻觉无关。

相似文献

2
Data gathering: biased in psychosis?数据收集:在精神病方面存在偏差?
Schizophr Bull. 2006 Apr;32(2):341-51. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbj021. Epub 2005 Oct 27.
9
Jumping to conclusions and paranoid ideation in the general population.普通人群中的草率下结论和偏执观念
Schizophr Res. 2008 Jul;102(1-3):254-60. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2008.03.020. Epub 2008 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

6
Neural Circuitry of Salience and Reward Processing in Psychosis.精神病中显著性和奖赏处理的神经回路
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2021 Dec 11;3(1):33-46. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.12.003. eCollection 2023 Jan.
7
Can you trust this source? Advice taking in borderline personality disorder.你能相信这个消息来源吗?边缘型人格障碍患者的咨询建议。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023 Jun;273(4):875-885. doi: 10.1007/s00406-022-01539-w. Epub 2023 Jan 11.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验