Abel Salazar Institute of Biomedical Sciences (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto (FFUP), Porto, Portugal; Epidemiology Research Unit (EPIUnit), Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Apr 10;764:142802. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142802. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
Although an increasing body of data reports the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in air, this does not correlate to the presence of infectious viruses, thus not evaluating the risk for airborne COVID-19. Hence there is a marked knowledge gap that requires urgent attention. Therefore, in this systematic review, viability/stability of airborne SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV viruses is discussed.
A systematic literature review was performed on PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science and Scopus to assess the stability and viability of SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 on air samples.
The initial search identified 27 articles. Following screening of titles and abstracts and removing duplicates, 11 articles were considered relevant. Temperatures ranging from 20 °C to 25 °C and relative humidity ranging from 40% to 50% were reported to have a protective effect on viral viability for airborne SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. As no data is yet available on the conditions influencing viability for airborne SARS-CoV-2, and given the genetic similarity to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, one could extrapolate that the same conditions would apply. Nonetheless, the effect of these conditions seems to be residual considering the increasing number of cases in the south of USA, Brazil and India, where high temperatures and humidities have been observed.
Higher temperatures and high relative humidity can have a modest effect on SARS-CoV-2 viability in the environment, as reported in previous studies to this date. However, these studies are experimental, and do not support the fact that the virus has efficiently spread in the tropical regions of the globe, with other transmission routes such as the contact and droplet ones probably being responsible for the majority of cases reported in these regions, along with other factors such as human mobility patterns and contact rates. Further studies are needed to investigate the extent of aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 as this would have important implications for public health and infection-control policies.
虽然越来越多的数据报告表明空气中存在 SARS-CoV-2 RNA,但这并不等同于存在传染性病毒,因此无法评估 COVID-19 通过空气传播的风险。因此,存在明显的知识空白,需要紧急关注。因此,在本系统评价中,讨论了空气中 SARS-CoV-2、SARS-CoV 和 MERS-CoV 病毒的存活能力/稳定性。
在 PubMed/MEDLINE、Web of Science 和 Scopus 上进行了系统文献综述,以评估 SARS-CoV、MERS-CoV 和 SARS-CoV-2 在空气样本中的稳定性和存活能力。
最初的搜索确定了 27 篇文章。经过标题和摘要筛选并去除重复项后,有 11 篇文章被认为是相关的。报告称,温度在 20°C 至 25°C 之间,相对湿度在 40%至 50%之间,对空气传播的 SARS-CoV 和 MERS-CoV 的病毒存活能力具有保护作用。由于目前尚无关于影响空气传播 SARS-CoV-2 存活能力的条件的数据,并且鉴于与 SARS-CoV 和 MERS-CoV 的遗传相似性,可以推断同样的条件也适用。尽管如此,考虑到美国南部、巴西和印度不断增加的病例数量,这些条件的影响似乎是残余的,因为这些地区的高温和高湿度已经被观察到。
正如迄今为止的研究报告所述,较高的温度和高相对湿度会对环境中的 SARS-CoV-2 存活能力产生适度影响。然而,这些研究是实验性的,并不能支持病毒在全球热带地区有效传播的事实,因为接触和飞沫等其他传播途径可能是这些地区报告的大多数病例的原因,此外还有其他因素,如人类流动模式和接触率。需要进一步研究来调查 SARS-CoV-2 的气溶胶传播程度,因为这对公共卫生和感染控制政策具有重要意义。