• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格、政治态度和社会人口特征在解释个体对冠状病毒恐惧差异中的作用:跨时间和跨国家的比较

The Role of Personality, Political Attitudes and Socio-Demographic Characteristics in Explaining Individual Differences in Fear of Coronavirus: A Comparison Over Time and Across Countries.

作者信息

Lippold Julia V, Laske Julia I, Hogeterp Svea A, Duke Éilish, Grünhage Thomas, Reuter Martin

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Department of Psychology, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 18;11:552305. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.552305. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.552305
PMID:33071872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7530433/
Abstract

Since the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in December 2019 about 500,000 people died within the first 6 months. The virus itself, as well as the related political decisions, intensified an increasing feeling of fear in billions of people worldwide. However, while some people remained unperturbed, others experienced panic over the current situation. In order to investigate individual differences in the perceptions, emotions and behaviors in response to the Coronavirus pandemic, an online survey was conducted between 6th and 27th of March 2020. Participants included 7309 individuals from 96 countries, who provided information on socio-demographics, personality, political orientation and general life satisfaction. To determine the specificity of fear of Coronavirus, we also investigated fear related to two other current political issues: the refugee and the climate crises. Overall, in parallel with the escalation of the pandemic, fear of Coronavirus increased significantly over the 22-day period, with the strongest predictors being the personality variable neuroticism, as well as education, sex and being an at-risk person. A detailed longitudinal analysis of the largest sample, Germany, revealed that political orientation was also an important predictor of fear of Coronavirus. Specifically, conservatives were more afraid of Coronavirus than liberals. However, as the perceived threat of the virus increased, the influence of political orientation disappeared, whereas personality remained a stable predictor. The pattern of results regarding the perceived threat of the refugee and climate crises painted a different picture: political orientation was by far the best predictor, more important even than personality. Conservatives were more worried about the refugees, and liberals about climate change. Cross-cultural analyses showed pronounced differences between countries, dependent on the crisis. Nonetheless, the importance of personality for the prediction of fear of Coronavirus remained stable over time and across the world within the investigated 22-day period.

摘要

自2019年12月新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行出现以来,在最初的6个月内约有50万人死亡。病毒本身以及相关的政治决策加剧了全球数十亿人日益增长的恐惧情绪。然而,有些人保持镇定,而另一些人则对当前形势感到恐慌。为了调查在应对冠状病毒大流行时人们在认知、情绪和行为上的个体差异,于2020年3月6日至27日进行了一项在线调查。参与者包括来自96个国家的7309个人,他们提供了有关社会人口统计学、个性、政治倾向和总体生活满意度的信息。为了确定对冠状病毒恐惧的特异性,我们还调查了与另外两个当前政治问题相关的恐惧:难民危机和气候危机。总体而言,随着大流行的升级,在这22天里对冠状病毒的恐惧显著增加,最强的预测因素是个性变量神经质,以及教育程度、性别和是否属于高危人群。对最大样本德国进行的详细纵向分析显示,政治倾向也是对冠状病毒恐惧的一个重要预测因素。具体而言,保守派比自由派更害怕冠状病毒。然而,随着对病毒感知威胁的增加,政治倾向的影响消失了,而个性仍然是一个稳定的预测因素。关于难民危机和气候危机感知威胁的结果模式呈现出不同的情况:政治倾向是迄今为止最好的预测因素,甚至比个性更重要。保守派更担心难民问题,自由派更担心气候变化问题。跨文化分析表明,不同国家之间存在明显差异,这取决于危机情况。尽管如此,在调查的22天内,个性对于预测对冠状病毒的恐惧的重要性在不同时间和全球范围内都保持稳定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26f5/7530433/89f42fe4face/fpsyg-11-552305-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26f5/7530433/2a7dceab1a58/fpsyg-11-552305-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26f5/7530433/89f42fe4face/fpsyg-11-552305-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26f5/7530433/2a7dceab1a58/fpsyg-11-552305-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26f5/7530433/89f42fe4face/fpsyg-11-552305-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Role of Personality, Political Attitudes and Socio-Demographic Characteristics in Explaining Individual Differences in Fear of Coronavirus: A Comparison Over Time and Across Countries.人格、政治态度和社会人口特征在解释个体对冠状病毒恐惧差异中的作用:跨时间和跨国家的比较
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 18;11:552305. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.552305. eCollection 2020.
2
Dispositional Fear and Political Attitudes.性格恐惧与政治态度。
Hum Nat. 2020 Dec;31(4):387-405. doi: 10.1007/s12110-020-09378-1. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
3
Left wings to the left: Posing and perceived political orientation.左翼向左:姿势与感知到的政治取向。
Laterality. 2018 May;23(3):364-376. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2017.1362421. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
4
Is that disgust I see? Political ideology and biased visual attention.我看到的是厌恶吗?政治意识形态与有偏见的视觉注意力。
Behav Brain Res. 2018 Jan 15;336:227-235. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
5
Functional Fear Predicts Public Health Compliance in the COVID-19 Pandemic.功能性恐惧可预测新冠疫情期间的公共卫生合规情况。
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2021;19(5):1875-1888. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00281-5. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
6
Examining the "Veggie" personality: Results from a representative German sample.考察“素食者”人格:来自代表性德国样本的结果。
Appetite. 2018 Jan 1;120:246-255. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
7
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
8
Why are conservatives less concerned about the coronavirus (COVID-19) than liberals? Comparing political, experiential, and partisan messaging explanations.为什么保守派比自由派更不担心冠状病毒(COVID-19)?比较政治、经验和党派信息方面的解释。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Dec;183:111124. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111124. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
9
Motivated Attention in Climate Change Perception and Action.气候变化认知与行动中的动机性注意力
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 16;10:1541. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01541. eCollection 2019.
10
Pandemic personality: Emotional reactions, political and social preferences across personality traits in times of Corona.大流行时期的人格:新冠疫情期间不同人格特质的情绪反应、政治和社会偏好
Curr Psychol. 2021 Nov 23:1-15. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02493-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Surveying Psychological Wellbeing in a Post-Pandemic World: The Role of Family and Social Support for LGBTQ+ and Cisgender Heterosexual Adults in the UK.审视疫情后世界中的心理健康:家庭和社会支持对英国 LGBTQ+ 群体及异性恋顺性别成年人的作用
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 16;12(16):1634. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12161634.
2
Understanding societal challenges: a Neurotech perspective.理解社会挑战:神经技术视角
Front Neurosci. 2024 Jul 26;18:1330470. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1330470. eCollection 2024.
3
Fear of COVID-19 and future anxiety among Polish university students during a pandemic.

本文引用的文献

1
Differentiating anxiety from fear: an experimental-pharmacological approach.区分焦虑与恐惧:一种实验药理学方法。
Personal Neurosci. 2020 Jun 17;3:e6. doi: 10.1017/pen.2020.1. eCollection 2020.
2
Implications of the behavioural immune system for social behaviour and human health in the modern world.行为免疫系统对现代社会行为和人类健康的影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 May 26;370(1669). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0105.
3
A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: psychometric criteria and genetic validation.
疫情期间波兰大学生对新冠病毒的恐惧及未来焦虑情绪
Health Psychol Rep. 2023 Jun 26;11(3):252-261. doi: 10.5114/hpr/165874. eCollection 2023.
4
Scoping review of climate change and mental health in Germany - Direct and indirect impacts, vulnerable groups, resilience factors.德国气候变化与心理健康的范围综述——直接和间接影响、弱势群体、恢复力因素
J Health Monit. 2023 Sep 6;8(Suppl 4):122-149. doi: 10.25646/11656. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
The personality puzzle: a comprehensive analysis of its impact on three buying behaviors.《性格谜团:对其对三种购买行为影响的综合分析》
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 21;14:1179257. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1179257. eCollection 2023.
6
Afraid but misinformed: Conspiracist beliefs cancel the positive influence of fear of COVID-19 on vaccination intentions - Findings from a Romanian sample.恐惧却被误导:阴谋论信念抵消了对新冠病毒的恐惧对疫苗接种意愿的积极影响——来自罗马尼亚样本的研究结果
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 20;14:1109064. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1109064. eCollection 2023.
7
Latent profile analysis of adaptation types and stress among medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea.韩国新冠疫情期间医科学生适应类型与压力的潜在剖面分析
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Jan-Feb;39(1):28-33. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.1.7196.
8
Factors affecting worriedness: A study of the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan.影响担忧情绪的因素:日本新冠疫情研究
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022 Nov;82:103322. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103322. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
9
Longitudinal changes in fear and anxiety among Chinese college students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a one-year follow-up study.新冠疫情期间中国大学生恐惧和焦虑的纵向变化:一项为期一年的随访研究
Curr Psychol. 2022 Jul 26:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03487-z.
10
Opinions and options about COVID-19: Personality correlates and sex differences in two European countries.关于 COVID-19 的意见和选择:两个欧洲国家的人格相关性和性别差异。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0268193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268193. eCollection 2022.
修订后的强化敏感性理论的一种新测量方法:心理测量标准与基因验证
Front Syst Neurosci. 2015 Mar 16;9:38. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00038. eCollection 2015.
4
Association between neuroticism and amygdala responsivity emerges under stressful conditions.神经质与杏仁核反应性之间的关联在压力条件下显现出来。
Neuroimage. 2015 May 15;112:218-224. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.014. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
5
Disentangling the molecular genetic basis of personality: from monoamines to neuropeptides.解析人格的分子遗传学基础:从单胺到神经肽。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Jun;43:228-39. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.04.006. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
6
The basic emotional circuits of mammalian brains: do animals have affective lives?哺乳动物大脑的基本情绪回路:动物是否有情感生活?
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Oct;35(9):1791-804. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.08.003. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
7
Public health significance of neuroticism.神经质的公共卫生意义。
Am Psychol. 2009 May-Jun;64(4):241-56. doi: 10.1037/a0015309.
8
Parasites, democratization, and the liberalization of values across contemporary countries.当代各国的寄生虫、民主化与价值观自由化
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2009 Feb;84(1):113-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00062.x. Epub 2008 Nov 22.
9
Long story short: the serotonin transporter in emotion regulation and social cognition.简而言之:血清素转运体在情绪调节和社会认知中的作用。
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Sep;10(9):1103-9. doi: 10.1038/nn1964.
10
The effect of gonadal hormones and gender on anxiety and emotional learning.性腺激素和性别对焦虑及情绪学习的影响。
Horm Behav. 2006 Nov;50(4):539-49. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.06.020. Epub 2006 Aug 14.