Liu Kathleen D, Forni Lui G, Heung Michael, Wu Vin-Cent, Kellum John A, Mehta Ravindra L, Ronco Claudio, Kashani Kianoush, Rosner Mitchell H, Haase Michael, Koyner Jay L
Division of Nephrology, Departments of Medicine and Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Division of Critical Care Medicine, Departments of Medicine and Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Kidney Int Rep. 2020 Aug 6;5(10):1634-1642. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.07.031. eCollection 2020 Oct.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) and acute kidney disease (AKD) are common complications in hospitalized patients and are associated with adverse outcomes. Although consensus guidelines have improved the care of patients with AKI and AKD, guidance regarding quality metrics in the care of patients after an episode of AKI or AKD is limited. For example, few patients receive follow-up laboratory testing of kidney function or post-AKI or AKD care through nephrology or other providers. Recently, the Acute Disease Quality Initiative developed a consensus statement regarding quality improvement goals for patients with AKI or AKD specifically highlighting efforts regarding quality and safety of care after hospital discharge after an episode of AKI or AKD. The goal is to use these measures to identify opportunities for improvement that will positively affect outcomes. We recommend that health care systems quantitate the proportion of patients who need and actually receive follow-up care after the index AKI or AKD hospitalization. The intensity and appropriateness of follow-up care should depend on patient characteristics, severity, duration, and course of AKI of AKD, and should evolve as evidence-based guidelines emerge. Quality indicators for discharged patients with dialysis requiring AKI or AKD should be distinct from end-stage renal disease measures. Besides, there should be specific quality indicators for those still requiring dialysis in the outpatient setting after AKI or AKD. Given the limited preexisting data guiding the care of patients after an episode of AKI or AKD, there is ample opportunity to establish quality measures and potentially improve patient care and outcomes. This review will provide specific evidence-based and expert opinion-based guidance for the care of patients with AKI or AKD after hospital discharge.
急性肾损伤(AKI)和急性肾脏病(AKD)是住院患者常见的并发症,且与不良预后相关。尽管共识指南改善了AKI和AKD患者的护理,但关于AKI或AKD发作后患者护理质量指标的指导有限。例如,很少有患者通过肾病科或其他医疗服务提供者接受肾功能的后续实验室检查或AKI或AKD后的护理。最近,急性疾病质量倡议组织针对AKI或AKD患者制定了一份关于质量改进目标的共识声明,特别强调了AKI或AKD发作后出院患者护理质量和安全方面的努力。目标是利用这些措施来识别改善机会,从而对预后产生积极影响。我们建议医疗保健系统量化在首次AKI或AKD住院后需要并实际接受后续护理的患者比例。后续护理的强度和适当性应取决于患者特征、AKI或AKD的严重程度、持续时间和病程,并应随着循证指南的出现而不断发展。需要透析的AKI或AKD出院患者的质量指标应与终末期肾病指标有所不同。此外,对于AKI或AKD后仍在门诊需要透析的患者,应有特定的质量指标。鉴于指导AKI或AKD发作后患者护理的现有数据有限,有充分的机会建立质量指标并有可能改善患者护理和预后。本综述将为AKI或AKD出院后患者的护理提供基于具体证据和专家意见的指导。