Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44511, Egypt.
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44511, Egypt.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2021 Apr;394(4):631-643. doi: 10.1007/s00210-020-02004-y. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
Nanotechnology has become a promising approach for addressing cancer therapy limitations because it reduces side effects and increases the efficacy of antineoplastic agents. Therefore, this research was designed to compare the in vitro therapeutic efficacy and in vivo adverse effects of gemcitabine (GEM) and gemcitabine-loaded silver nanoparticles (GEM-AgNPs). GEM molecules were successfully attached to AgNP surfaces with a homogenous and spherical shape. The zeta size of AgNPs and GEM-AgNPs was 79.35 ± 3.2 and 75.1 ± 7 nm, respectively. The anticancer effect of AgNPs and GEM-AgNPs was investigated against a human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line (HepG2), and cytotoxic activity was evaluated by MTT assay. Apoptosis/necrosis and cell cycle arrest were also assessed. The cytotoxic activity was recorded in a concentration-dependent way. The findings have shown that GEM-AgNPs induced a better cytotoxic effect with an IC value of 13.63 μg/mL compared to GEM (IC value of 24.19 μg/mL) or AgNPs alone (IC value of 50.6 μg/mL). GEM-AgNPs induced pre-G1 arrest and apoptotic/necrotic cell death. Our in vivo analysis involved the use of 40 male rats assigned equally into the control rats, and rats injected intraperitoneally with GEM (134 mg/kg), AgNPs (1 mg/kg), and GEM-AgNPs (134 mg/kg). GEM and GEM-AgNPs were administered on the 1st, 7th, and 14th day of the experiment. Intraperitoneal GEM injection induced marked hematological, biochemical, hepatorenal, and histopathological alterations, while the loading of GEM in AgNPs to some extent ameliorated these alterations and significantly improved its therapeutic efficacy against HepG2 cells. These findings indicate the potential use of GEM-AgNPs in the clinical setting for anticancer treatment.
纳米技术已成为解决癌症治疗局限性的一种有前途的方法,因为它可以降低副作用并提高抗肿瘤药物的疗效。因此,本研究旨在比较吉西他滨(GEM)和载吉西他滨的银纳米粒子(GEM-AgNPs)的体外治疗效果和体内不良反应。GEM 分子成功地附着在具有均匀和球形的 AgNP 表面上。AgNPs 和 GEM-AgNPs 的 Zeta 大小分别为 79.35 ± 3.2nm 和 75.1 ± 7nm。通过 MTT 测定评估了 AgNPs 和 GEM-AgNPs 对人肝癌细胞系(HepG2)的抗癌作用,并评估了细胞毒性活性。还评估了细胞凋亡/坏死和细胞周期停滞。细胞毒性活性呈浓度依赖性记录。研究结果表明,与 GEM(IC 值为 24.19μg/mL)或单独的 AgNPs(IC 值为 50.6μg/mL)相比,GEM-AgNPs 以 13.63μg/mL 的 IC 值诱导了更好的细胞毒性作用。GEM-AgNPs 诱导了 G1 期前阻滞和凋亡/坏死细胞死亡。我们的体内分析涉及使用 40 只雄性大鼠,平均分为对照组大鼠,以及腹腔注射 GEM(134mg/kg)、AgNPs(1mg/kg)和 GEM-AgNPs(134mg/kg)的大鼠。在实验的第 1、7 和 14 天给予 GEM 和 GEM-AgNPs。腹腔内注射 GEM 引起明显的血液学、生化、肝肾功能和组织病理学改变,而将 GEM 载入 AgNPs 在某种程度上改善了这些改变,并显著提高了其对 HepG2 细胞的治疗效果。这些发现表明 GEM-AgNPs 在临床环境中具有用于癌症治疗的潜力。