Mult Scler. 2020 Jun 26:1352458520924594. doi: 10.1177/1352458520924594.
Evidence for a role of human gut microbiota in multiple sclerosis (MS) risk is mounting, yet large variability is seen across studies. This is, in part, due to the lack of standardization of study protocols, sample collection methods, and sequencing approaches.
This study aims to address the effect of a household experimental design, sample collection, and sequencing approaches in a gut microbiome study in MS subjects from a multi-city study population.
We analyzed 128 MS patient and cohabiting healthy control pairs from the International MS Microbiome Study (iMSMS). A total of 1005 snap-frozen or desiccated Q-tip stool samples were collected and evaluated using 16S and shallow whole-metagenome shotgun sequencing.
The intra-individual variance observed by different collection strategies was dramatically lower than inter-individual variance. Shallow shotgun highly correlated with 16S sequencing. Participant house and recruitment site accounted for the two largest sources of microbial variance, while higher microbial similarity was seen in household-matched participants as hypothesized. A significant proportion of the variance in dietary intake was also dominated by geographic distance.
A household pair study largely overcomes common inherent limitations and increases statistical power in population-based microbiome studies.
越来越多的证据表明人类肠道微生物群在多发性硬化症(MS)风险中发挥作用,但各研究结果差异很大。部分原因在于研究方案、样本采集方法和测序方法缺乏标准化。
本研究旨在探讨家庭实验设计、样本采集和测序方法对来自多城市研究人群的MS患者肠道微生物组研究的影响。
我们分析了国际MS微生物组研究(iMSMS)中的128对MS患者及其同居健康对照。共收集了1005份速冻或干燥的Q型拭子粪便样本,并使用16S和浅层全宏基因组鸟枪法测序进行评估。
不同采集策略观察到的个体内差异远低于个体间差异。浅层鸟枪法与16S测序高度相关。参与者的家庭和招募地点是微生物差异的两个最大来源,而正如假设的那样,家庭匹配的参与者之间微生物相似性更高。饮食摄入量差异的很大一部分也受地理距离主导。
家庭配对研究在很大程度上克服了常见的固有局限性,并提高了基于人群的微生物组研究的统计效力。