Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Kocaeli, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Department of Airframe & Powerplant, Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, University of Kocaeli, Kocaeli, Turkey.
J Prosthodont. 2021 Jul;30(6):481-489. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13278. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
To investigate the effects of different polishing procedures on surface properties of CAD/CAM resin blocks.
In this study, three different CAD/CAM restorative materials (Cerasmart, Lava Ultimate and Shofu Block HC) were used. CAD/CAM blocks were cut in 3-mm-thick slabs and divided into 5 groups. Group-1: Glaze; Group-2: Two-step Diamond Polisher; Group-3: One-step Diamond Polisher; Group-4: Three-step Diamond Polisher; Group-5: Polishing Discs+Diamond Paste. After polishing, top surfaces of the samples were prepared to screen by noncontact laser profilometer (Nanovea) for measurements. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
The arithmetical mean deviation of the profile was defined as Ra. The extension of Ra (a line's arithmetical mean height) to a surface was defined as Sa. Compared to the arithmetical mean of the surface, Sa expresses the difference in terms of each point's height as an absolute value. Sa was commonly used to assess surface roughness. The highest surface roughness (Ra) values in this study were 0.313 ± 0.05 for Cerasmart, 0.433 ± 0.10 for Lava Ultimate and 0.320 ± 0.05 for Shofu Block HC. The specimens in Group-4 displayed higher Ra values than other groups for each CAD/CAM material. According to surface topography (Sa) values, highest values were 2.936 ± 1.25 for Cerasmart, 2.633 ± 1.28 for Lava Ultimate and 3.489 ± 0.57 for Shofu Block HC. For Cerasmart, LAVA Ultimate and Shofu blocks, Group-1 exhibited significantly higher Sa values than other groups (p < 0.001).
Optiglaze Color, Sof-Lex Diamond and Identoflex Diamond Ceramic Polisher create smooth CAD/CAM resin surfaces. However, surface roughness values of Cosmedent Nano/Microhybrid Diamond and Diapolisher Paste applied specimens were high. According to Sa values, highest roughness values belong to Optiglaze Color.
研究不同抛光程序对 CAD/CAM 树脂块表面性能的影响。
本研究使用了三种不同的 CAD/CAM 修复材料(Cerasmart、Lava Ultimate 和 Shofu Block HC)。将 CAD/CAM 块切割成 3 毫米厚的薄片,然后分为 5 组。组 1:上釉;组 2:两步金刚石抛光器;组 3:一步金刚石抛光器;组 4:三步金刚石抛光器;组 5:抛光盘+金刚石膏。抛光后,使用非接触式激光轮廓仪(Nanovea)对样品的顶表面进行准备以进行筛选,用于测量。使用双向方差分析(ANOVA)对数据进行分析。
轮廓的算术平均偏差定义为 Ra。Ra(线的算术平均高度)扩展到表面的部分定义为 Sa。与表面的算术平均值相比,Sa 以绝对值表示每个点高度的差异。Sa 通常用于评估表面粗糙度。本研究中最高的表面粗糙度(Ra)值为 Cerasmart 的 0.313 ± 0.05、Lava Ultimate 的 0.433 ± 0.10 和 Shofu Block HC 的 0.320 ± 0.05。对于每种 CAD/CAM 材料,组 4 的试件显示出比其他组更高的 Ra 值。根据表面形貌(Sa)值,Cerasmart 的最高值为 2.936 ± 1.25、Lava Ultimate 的为 2.633 ± 1.28 和 Shofu Block HC 的为 3.489 ± 0.57。对于 Cerasmart、LAVA Ultimate 和 Shofu 块,组 1 的 Sa 值明显高于其他组(p < 0.001)。
Optiglaze Color、Sof-Lex Diamond 和 Identoflex Diamond Ceramic Polisher 可创造出光滑的 CAD/CAM 树脂表面。然而,Cosmedent Nano/Microhybrid Diamond 和 Diapolisher Paste 应用试件的表面粗糙度值较高。根据 Sa 值,最高粗糙度值属于 Optiglaze Color。