• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

深度主动学习在发作间期-发作期损伤连续 EEG 模式中的应用。

Deep active learning for Interictal Ictal Injury Continuum EEG patterns.

机构信息

Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Neurology, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Georgia Institute of Technology, College of Computing, Atlanta, GA, Georgia.

出版信息

J Neurosci Methods. 2021 Mar 1;351:108966. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108966. Epub 2020 Oct 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108966
PMID:33131680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8135050/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Seizures and seizure-like electroencephalography (EEG) patterns, collectively referred to as "ictal interictal injury continuum" (IIIC) patterns, are commonly encountered in critically ill patients. Automated detection is important for patient care and to enable research. However, training accurate detectors requires a large labeled dataset. Active Learning (AL) may help select informative examples to label, but the optimal AL approach remains unclear.

METHODS

We assembled >200,000 h of EEG from 1,454 hospitalized patients. From these, we collected 9,808 labeled and 120,000 unlabeled 10-second EEG segments. Labels included 6 IIIC patterns. In each AL iteration, a Dense-Net Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) learned vector representations for EEG segments using available labels, which were used to create a 2D embedding map. Nearest-neighbor label spreading within the embedding map was used to create additional pseudo-labeled data. A second Dense-Net was trained using real- and pseudo-labels. We evaluated several strategies for selecting candidate points for experts to label next. Finally, we compared two methods for class balancing within queries: standard balanced-based querying (SBBQ), and high confidence spread-based balanced querying (HCSBBQ).

RESULTS

Our results show: 1) Label spreading increased convergence speed for AL. 2) All query criteria produced similar results to random sampling. 3) HCSBBQ query balancing performed best. Using label spreading and HCSBBQ query balancing, we were able to train models approaching expert-level performance across all pattern categories after obtaining ∼7000 expert labels.

CONCLUSION

Our results provide guidance regarding the use of AL to efficiently label large EEG datasets in critically ill patients.

摘要

目的

发作和类似发作的脑电图(EEG)模式,统称为“发作间损伤连续体(IIIC)”模式,在危重病患者中很常见。自动检测对于患者护理和研究都是很重要的。然而,训练准确的检测器需要一个大型的标记数据集。主动学习(AL)可以帮助选择有信息的示例进行标记,但最佳的 AL 方法仍不清楚。

方法

我们收集了 1454 名住院患者的>200,000 小时的 EEG。从这些 EEG 中,我们收集了 9808 个有标签和 120,000 个无标签的 10 秒 EEG 片段。标签包括 6 种 IIIC 模式。在每个 AL 迭代中,一个密集网络卷积神经网络(CNN)使用可用的标签学习 EEG 片段的向量表示,这些表示被用于创建一个 2D 嵌入图。在嵌入图中使用最近邻标签传播来创建额外的伪标签数据。使用真实和伪标签训练第二个密集网络。我们评估了几种选择专家下一个标记候选点的策略。最后,我们比较了两种在查询中进行类别平衡的方法:标准平衡查询(SBBQ)和高置信度传播平衡查询(HCSBBQ)。

结果

我们的结果表明:1)标签传播增加了 AL 的收敛速度。2)所有查询标准都产生了与随机抽样相似的结果。3)HCSBBQ 查询平衡表现最佳。使用标签传播和 HCSBBQ 查询平衡,在获得约 7000 个专家标签后,我们能够训练出接近专家水平性能的模型,适用于所有模式类别。

结论

我们的结果为在危重病患者中有效地对大型 EEG 数据集进行标记提供了指导。

相似文献

1
Deep active learning for Interictal Ictal Injury Continuum EEG patterns.深度主动学习在发作间期-发作期损伤连续 EEG 模式中的应用。
J Neurosci Methods. 2021 Mar 1;351:108966. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108966. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
2
Improving Clinician Performance in Classifying EEG Patterns on the Ictal-Interictal Injury Continuum Using Interpretable Machine Learning.使用可解释的机器学习提高临床医生在发作期-发作间期损伤连续体上对脑电图模式进行分类的能力。
NEJM AI. 2024 Jun;1(6). doi: 10.1056/aioa2300331. Epub 2024 May 23.
3
Rapid annotation of seizures and interictal-ictal-injury continuum EEG patterns.癫痫发作及发作间期-发作期-损伤连续脑电图模式的快速标注
J Neurosci Methods. 2021 Jan 1;347:108956. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108956. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
4
Automatic seizure detection using three-dimensional CNN based on multi-channel EEG.基于多通道 EEG 的三维卷积神经网络的自动癫痫发作检测。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Dec 7;18(Suppl 5):111. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0693-8.
5
Development of Expert-Level Classification of Seizures and Rhythmic and Periodic Patterns During EEG Interpretation.在脑电图解读中,对癫痫发作和节律及周期性模式进行专家级分类的开发。
Neurology. 2023 Apr 25;100(17):e1750-e1762. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207127. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
6
The EEG Ictal-Interictal Continuum-A Metabolic Roar But a Whimper of a Functional Outcome.脑电图发作期-发作间期连续体——代谢活跃却功能结果不佳。
Epilepsy Curr. 2019 Jul-Aug;19(4):234-236. doi: 10.1177/1535759719855968. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
7
Seizure detection by convolutional neural network-based analysis of scalp electroencephalography plot images.基于卷积神经网络的头皮脑电图图谱图像分析的癫痫发作检测。
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;22:101684. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101684. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
8
Deep-learning-based seizure detection and prediction from electroencephalography signals.基于深度学习的脑电图信号癫痫发作检测与预测。
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2022 Jun;38(6):e3573. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3573. Epub 2022 May 13.
9
Convolutional neural network with autoencoder-assisted multiclass labelling for seizure detection based on scalp electroencephalography.基于头皮脑电图的卷积神经网络与自动编码器辅助多类标记用于癫痫发作检测
Comput Biol Med. 2020 Oct;125:104016. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104016. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
10
Interrater Reliability of Expert Electroencephalographers Identifying Seizures and Rhythmic and Periodic Patterns in EEGs.专家脑电图医师识别脑电图中的癫痫发作和节律及周期性模式的组间可靠性。
Neurology. 2023 Apr 25;100(17):e1737-e1749. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201670. Epub 2022 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Using artificial intelligence to optimize anti-seizure treatment and EEG-guided decisions in severe brain injury.利用人工智能优化重型脑损伤的抗癫痫治疗及脑电图引导决策。
Neurotherapeutics. 2025 Jan;22(1):e00524. doi: 10.1016/j.neurot.2025.e00524. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
2
Improving Clinician Performance in Classifying EEG Patterns on the Ictal-Interictal Injury Continuum Using Interpretable Machine Learning.使用可解释的机器学习提高临床医生在发作期-发作间期损伤连续体上对脑电图模式进行分类的能力。
NEJM AI. 2024 Jun;1(6). doi: 10.1056/aioa2300331. Epub 2024 May 23.
3
How many patients do you need? Investigating trial designs for anti-seizure treatment in acute brain injury patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Electrographic seizures and ictal-interictal continuum (IIC) patterns in critically ill patients.危重病患者的电发作和发作-发作间连续状态(IIC)模式。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 May;106:107037. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107037. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
2
Rapid Annotation of Seizures and Interictal-ictal Continuum EEG Patterns.癫痫发作及发作间期-发作期连续脑电图模式的快速标注
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018 Jul;2018:3394-3397. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513059.
3
On-line EEG Denoising and Cleaning Using Correlated Sparse Recovery and Active Learning.
需要多少患者?调查急性脑损伤患者抗癫痫治疗的试验设计。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024 Jul;11(7):1681-1690. doi: 10.1002/acn3.52059. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
4
An active learning approach to train a deep learning algorithm for tumor segmentation from brain MR images.一种用于从脑部磁共振图像中训练深度学习算法进行肿瘤分割的主动学习方法。
Insights Imaging. 2023 Aug 25;14(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01487-6.
5
Quantitative epileptiform burden and electroencephalography background features predict post-traumatic epilepsy.定量痫样负荷和脑电图背景特征预测外伤性癫痫。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2023 Mar;94(3):245-249. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2022-329542. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
6
Precision Care in Cardiac Arrest: ICECAP (PRECICECAP) Study Protocol and Informatics Approach.心脏骤停精准治疗:ICECAP(精准心脏骤停研究)研究方案及信息学方法。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Aug;37(Suppl 2):237-247. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01464-9. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
7
Automated Annotation of Epileptiform Burden and Its Association with Outcomes.癫痫样负荷的自动标注及其与结局的关系。
Ann Neurol. 2021 Aug;90(2):300-311. doi: 10.1002/ana.26161. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
基于相关稀疏恢复和主动学习的在线脑电图去噪与清理
Int J Wirel Inf Netw. 2017 Jun;24(2):109-123. doi: 10.1007/s10776-017-0346-3. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
4
Towards an Online Seizure Advisory System-An Adaptive Seizure Prediction Framework Using Active Learning Heuristics.迈向在线癫痫预警系统:基于主动学习启发式的自适应癫痫预测框架。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 May 24;18(6):1698. doi: 10.3390/s18061698.
5
The Ictal-Interictal Continuum: To Treat or Not to Treat (and How)?发作-发作间期连续谱:治疗还是不治疗(以及如何治疗)?
Neurocrit Care. 2018 Aug;29(1):3-8. doi: 10.1007/s12028-017-0477-5.
6
SEMI-AUTOMATED ANNOTATION OF SIGNAL EVENTS IN CLINICAL EEG DATA.临床脑电图数据中信号事件的半自动标注
IEEE Signal Process Med Biol Symp. 2016 Dec;2016. doi: 10.1109/SPMB.2016.7846855. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
7
Electrographic Features of Lateralized Periodic Discharges Stratify Risk in the Interictal-Ictal Continuum.侧化周期性放电的脑电图特征在发作间期-发作期连续体中分层风险。
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jul;34(4):365-369. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000370.
8
Understanding and Managing the Ictal-Interictal Continuum in Neurocritical Care.理解与管理神经重症监护中的发作期-发作间期连续体
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2016 Feb;18(2):8. doi: 10.1007/s11940-015-0391-0.
9
Rhythmic and periodic EEG patterns of 'ictal-interictal uncertainty' in critically ill neurological patients.重症神经科患者中“发作期-发作间期不确定性”的节律性和周期性脑电图模式
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Feb;127(2):1176-1181. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.09.135. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
10
Salzburg Consensus Criteria for Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus--approach to clinical application.非惊厥性癫痫持续状态的萨尔茨堡共识标准——临床应用方法
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Aug;49:158-63. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 Jun 17.