Population and Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Nov 26;70(701):e874-e879. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X713417. Print 2020 Dec.
High-quality, personalised palliative care should be available to all, but timely recognition of end of life may be a barrier to end-of-life care for older people.
To investigate the timing of end-of-life recognition, palliative registration, and the recording of end-of-life preferences in primary care for people aged ≥75 years.
Retrospective cohort study using national primary care record data, covering 34% of GP practices in England.
ResearchOne data from electronic healthcare records (EHRs) of people aged ≥75 years who died in England between 1 January 2015 and 1 January 2016 were examined. Clinical codes relating to end-of-life recognition, palliative registration, and end-of-life preferences were extracted, and the number of months that elapsed between the code being entered and death taking place were calculated. The timing for each outcome and proportion of relevant EHRs were reported.
Death was recorded for a total of 13 149 people in ResearchOne data during the 1-year study window. Of those, 6303 (47.9%) records contained codes suggesting end of life had been recognised at a point in time prior to the month of death. Recognition occurred ≥12 months before death in 2248 (17.1%) records. In total, 1659 (12.6%) people were on the palliative care register and 457 (3.5%) were on the register for ≥12 months before death; 2987 (22.7%) records had a code for the patient's preferred place of care, and 1713 (13.0%) had a code for the preferred place of death. Where preferences for place of death were recorded, a care, nursing, or residential home ( = 813, 47.5%) and the individual's home ( = 752, 43.9%) were the most common.
End-of-life recognition in primary care appears to occur near to death and for only a minority of people aged ≥75 years. The findings suggest that older people's deaths may not be anticipated by health professionals, compromising equitable access to palliative care.
高质量、个性化的姑息治疗应该面向所有人,但及时识别生命终末期可能是老年人获得临终关怀的障碍。
调查≥75 岁人群在初级保健中生命终末期的识别、姑息治疗登记和临终偏好记录的时间。
使用全国初级保健记录数据的回顾性队列研究,涵盖英格兰 34%的全科医生实践。
研究人员查阅了 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 1 月 1 日期间在英格兰去世的≥75 岁人群的 ResearchOne 电子健康记录(EHR)中的数据。提取与生命终末期识别、姑息治疗登记和临终偏好相关的临床代码,并计算从代码输入到死亡发生的月数。报告了每个结果的时间和相关 EHR 的比例。
在为期 1 年的研究窗口内,ResearchOne 数据共记录了 13149 人死亡。其中,6303 人(47.9%)的记录中有临终已被识别的代码,这些人在死亡月份之前的某个时间点已经被识别为临终状态。2248 人(17.1%)的记录中临终识别发生在死亡前 12 个月以上。总共有 1659 人(12.6%)在姑息治疗登记册上,457 人(3.5%)在登记册上的时间≥12 个月前死亡;2987 人(22.7%)的记录中有患者首选护理地点的代码,1713 人(13.0%)有死亡地点的代码。在记录了死亡地点偏好的情况下,最常见的是护理、护理或养老院(=813,47.5%)和个人家庭(=752,43.9%)。
初级保健中的生命终末期识别似乎发生在接近死亡的时候,而且只有少数≥75 岁的人被识别。这些发现表明,卫生专业人员可能没有预测到老年人的死亡,这影响了公平获得姑息治疗的机会。