Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Information Technology Osijek, Kneza Trpimira 2b, 31000, Osijek, Croatia.
Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, imec-TELIN-IPI, imec-Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2020 Dec;11(6):725-747. doi: 10.1007/s13239-020-00494-8. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
Preservation and improvement of heart and vessel health is the primary motivation behind cardiovascular disease (CVD) research. Development of advanced imaging techniques can improve our understanding of disease physiology and serve as a monitor for disease progression. Various image processing approaches have been proposed to extract parameters of cardiac shape and function from different cardiac imaging modalities with an overall intention of providing full cardiac analysis. Due to differences in image modalities, the selection of an appropriate segmentation algorithm may be a challenging task.
This paper presents a comprehensive and critical overview of research on the whole heart, bi-ventricles and left atrium segmentation methods from computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MRI) and echocardiography (echo) imaging. The paper aims to: (1) summarize the considerable challenges of cardiac image segmentation, (2) provide the comparison of the segmentation methods, (3) classify significant contributions in the field and (4) critically review approaches in terms of their performance and accuracy.
The methods described are classified based on the used segmentation approach into (1) edge-based segmentation methods, (2) model-fitting segmentation methods and (3) machine and deep learning segmentation methods and are further split based on the targeted cardiac structure. Edge-based methods are mostly developed as semi-automatic and allow end-user interaction, which provides physicians with extra control over the final segmentation. Model-fitting methods are very robust and resistant to the high variability in image contrast and overall image quality. Nevertheless, they are often time-consuming and require appropriate models with prior knowledge. While the emerging deep learning segmentation approaches provide unprecedented performance in some specific scenarios and under the appropriate training, their performance highly depends on the data quality and the amount and the accuracy of provided annotations.
保护和改善心脏和血管健康是心血管疾病(CVD)研究的主要动机。先进的成像技术的发展可以提高我们对疾病生理学的理解,并作为疾病进展的监测器。已经提出了各种图像处理方法,以便从不同的心脏成像模式中提取心脏形状和功能的参数,总体目的是提供全面的心脏分析。由于图像模式的差异,选择适当的分割算法可能是一项具有挑战性的任务。
本文对从计算机断层扫描(CT)、磁共振(MRI)和超声心动图(echo)成像中提取心脏、双心室和左心房分割方法的研究进行了全面和批判性的综述。本文旨在:(1)总结心脏图像分割的巨大挑战,(2)提供分割方法的比较,(3)对该领域的重要贡献进行分类,(4)根据其性能和准确性对方法进行批判性评价。
所描述的方法根据所使用的分割方法分为(1)基于边缘的分割方法、(2)模型拟合的分割方法和(3)机器和深度学习的分割方法,并根据目标心脏结构进一步细分。基于边缘的方法主要是作为半自动方法开发的,允许最终用户交互,为医生提供对最终分割的额外控制。模型拟合方法非常健壮,对图像对比度和整体图像质量的高度变化具有很强的抵抗力。然而,它们通常需要时间,并且需要具有先验知识的适当模型。虽然新兴的深度学习分割方法在某些特定场景下和在适当的训练下提供了前所未有的性能,但它们的性能高度依赖于数据质量以及提供的注释的数量和准确性。