Suppr超能文献

列线图与机器学习技术预测舌癌患者总生存的比较。

Comparison of nomogram with machine learning techniques for prediction of overall survival in patients with tongue cancer.

机构信息

Department of Industrial Digitalization, School of Technology and Innovations, University of Vaasa, Vaasa, Finland.

Research Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Division of Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2021 Jan;145:104313. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104313. Epub 2020 Oct 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prediction of overall survival in tongue cancer is important for planning of personalized care and patient counselling.

OBJECTIVES

This study compares the performance of a nomogram with a machine learning model to predict overall survival in tongue cancer. The nomogram and machine learning model were built using a large data set from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database. The comparison is necessary to provide the clinicians with a comprehensive, practical, and most accurate assistive system to predict overall survival of this patient population.

METHODS

The data set used included the records of 7596 tongue cancer patients. The considered machine learning algorithms were logistic regression, support vector machine, Bayes point machine, boosted decision tree, decision forest, and decision jungle. These algorithms were mainly evaluated in terms of the areas under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and accuracy values. The performance of the algorithm that produced the best result was compared with a nomogram to predict overall survival in tongue cancer patients.

RESULTS

The boosted decision-tree algorithm outperformed other algorithms. When compared with a nomogram using external validation data, the boosted decision tree produced an accuracy of 88.7% while the nomogram showed an accuracy of 60.4%. In addition, it was found that age of patient, T stage, radiotherapy, and the surgical resection were the most prominent features with significant influence on the machine learning model's performance to predict overall survival.

CONCLUSION

The machine learning model provides more personalized and reliable prognostic information of tongue cancer than the nomogram. However, the level of transparency offered by the nomogram in estimating patients' outcomes seems more confident and strengthened the principle of shared decision making between the patient and clinician. Therefore, a combination of a nomogram - machine learning (NomoML) predictive model may help to improve care, provides information to patients, and facilitates the clinicians in making tongue cancer management-related decisions.

摘要

背景

舌癌总生存期的预测对制定个性化治疗方案和患者咨询至关重要。

目的

本研究比较了列线图和机器学习模型预测舌癌总生存期的性能。该列线图和机器学习模型是使用来自监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)计划数据库的大型数据集构建的。这种比较对于为临床医生提供一个全面、实用且最准确的辅助系统来预测该患者群体的总生存期是必要的。

方法

使用的数据集中包括 7596 例舌癌患者的记录。所考虑的机器学习算法包括逻辑回归、支持向量机、贝叶斯点机、增强决策树、决策森林和决策丛林。这些算法主要根据接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线下的面积(AUC)和准确度值进行评估。比较了产生最佳结果的算法与列线图预测舌癌患者总生存期的性能。

结果

增强决策树算法的表现优于其他算法。使用外部验证数据与列线图进行比较时,增强决策树的准确率为 88.7%,而列线图的准确率为 60.4%。此外,发现患者年龄、T 分期、放疗和手术切除是对机器学习模型预测总生存期性能影响最大的最显著特征。

结论

与列线图相比,机器学习模型为舌癌患者提供了更个性化和可靠的预后信息。然而,列线图在评估患者预后方面提供的透明度似乎更有信心,并加强了患者和临床医生之间的共同决策原则。因此,列线图-机器学习(NomoML)预测模型的组合可能有助于改善护理,为患者提供信息,并帮助临床医生做出与舌癌管理相关的决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验