Department of Health Sciences, College of Natural and Health Sciences, Zayed University, Abu Dhabi 144534, UAE.
Lebanese International University, Beirut 14404, Lebanon.
Nutrients. 2020 Oct 30;12(11):3352. doi: 10.3390/nu12113352.
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, with atherogenic dyslipidemia being a major contributing factor.
A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement to assess whether vitamin D supplementation (VDS) alleviates dyslipidemia in adults with MetS. Scientific databases (PUBMED, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) and the gray literature were searched for randomized controlled trials of VDS, reporting on blood lipids. A narrative review, meta-analyses, sensitivity analyses, and appraisal of the risk of bias and overall quality of evidence produced were conducted.
Seven studies were included, and four were meta-analyzed. The risk of bias was generally low, and the final quality of evidence was low or very low. VDS, whether in high or low dose, significantly increased endline vitamin D blood levels; did not affect total, low-density, high-density cholesterol levels, and novel lipid-related biomarkers; yet, significantly increased triglycerides (TG) levels compared with placebo (MD: 30.67 (95%CI: 4.89-56.45) mg/dL; = 0.02 for low-dose VDS; and MD: 27.33 (95%CI: 2.06-52.59) mg/dL; = 0.03 for high-dose VDS). Pertaining heterogeneity was high (I = 86%; and I = 51%, respectively), and some included studies had significantly higher baseline TG in the intervention arm. The sensitivity analyses revealed robust results.
VDS seems not to affect blood lipids in adults with MetS.
代谢综合征(MetS)会增加心血管疾病的风险,其中致动脉粥样硬化性血脂异常是一个主要的致病因素。
按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明进行系统综述,以评估维生素 D 补充(VDS)是否能缓解代谢综合征成人的血脂异常。在 PUBMED、MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、ClinicalTrials.gov 和国际临床试验注册平台等科学数据库以及灰色文献中检索了关于 VDS 对血脂影响的随机对照试验。进行了叙述性综述、荟萃分析、敏感性分析以及偏倚风险评估和总体证据质量评估。
纳入了 7 项研究,其中 4 项进行了荟萃分析。偏倚风险总体较低,最终证据质量为低或极低。无论高剂量还是低剂量 VDS,均能显著提高基线维生素 D 血液水平;对总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平和新型脂质相关生物标志物无影响;但与安慰剂相比,能显著升高甘油三酯(TG)水平(MD:30.67(95%CI:4.89-56.45)mg/dL;低剂量 VDS 为 = 0.02;MD:27.33(95%CI:2.06-52.59)mg/dL;高剂量 VDS 为 = 0.03)。异质性较高(分别为 I = 86%和 I = 51%),并且一些纳入的研究在干预组的基线 TG 显著较高。敏感性分析显示结果稳健。
VDS 似乎不会影响代谢综合征成人的血脂。