Zaninotto Vincent, Raynaud Xavier, Gendreau Emmanuel, Kraepiel Yvan, Motard Eric, Babiar Olivier, Hansart Amandine, Hignard Cécile, Dajoz Isabelle
Sorbonne Université, CNRS, IRD, INRAE, Université de Paris, UPEC Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences-Paris (iEES-Paris) Paris France.
Paris Green Space and Environmental Department (DEVE) Paris France.
Ecol Evol. 2020 Sep 21;10(20):11607-11621. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6794. eCollection 2020 Oct.
Urban habitat characteristics create environmental filtering of pollinator communities. They also impact pollinating insect phenology through the presence of an urban heat island and the year-round availability of floral resources provided by ornamental plants.Here, we monitored the phenology and composition of pollinating insect communities visiting replicates of an experimental plant assemblage comprising two species, with contrasting floral traits: and , whose flowering periods were artificially extended. Plant assemblage replicates were set up over two consecutive years in two different habitats: rural and densely urbanized, within the same biogeographical region (Ile-de-France region, France).The phenology of pollination activity, recorded from the beginning (early March) to the end (early November) of the season, differed between these two habitats. Several pollinator morphogroups (small wild bees, bumblebees, honeybees) were significantly more active on our plant sets in the urban habitat compared to the rural one, especially in early spring and autumn. This resulted in different overall reproductive success of the plant assemblage between the two habitats. Over the course of the season, reproductive success of was always significantly higher in the urban habitat, while reproductive success of was significantly higher in the urban habitat only during early flowering.These findings suggest different phenological adaptations to the urban habitat for different groups of pollinators. Overall, results indicate that the broadened activity period of pollinating insects recorded in the urban environment could enhance the pollination function and the reproductive success of plant communities in cities.
城市栖息地特征对传粉者群落产生环境筛选作用。它们还通过城市热岛效应的存在以及观赏植物全年提供的花卉资源,影响传粉昆虫的物候。在此,我们监测了访花传粉昆虫群落的物候和组成,这些昆虫访的是一种实验性植物组合的重复样本,该组合包含两种具有不同花部特征的植物:[植物名称1]和[植物名称2],其花期被人为延长。植物组合重复样本在连续两年内在两个不同栖息地设置:农村和高度城市化地区,位于同一生物地理区域(法国法兰西岛地区)。从季节开始(3月初)到结束(11月初)记录的传粉活动物候,在这两个栖息地之间存在差异。与农村栖息地相比,几个传粉者形态类群(小型野生蜜蜂、熊蜂、蜜蜂)在城市栖息地的我们的植物样本上活动明显更频繁,尤其是在早春和秋季。这导致两个栖息地之间植物组合的总体繁殖成功率不同。在整个季节中,[植物名称1]在城市栖息地的繁殖成功率始终显著更高,而[植物名称2]仅在开花初期在城市栖息地的繁殖成功率显著更高。这些发现表明不同传粉者群体对城市栖息地有不同的物候适应性。总体而言,结果表明在城市环境中记录到的传粉昆虫活动期延长可增强城市植物群落的传粉功能和繁殖成功率。