Suppr超能文献

干血斑与血清样本在测量菲律宾宿雾市儿童队列中登革热血清流行率方面的性能比较。

Performance of Dried Blood Spots Compared with Serum Samples for Measuring Dengue Seroprevalence in a Cohort of Children in Cebu, Philippines.

机构信息

1Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines-Manila, Manila, Philippines.

2Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

出版信息

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Jan;104(1):130-135. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0937.

Abstract

Dengue seroprevalence data are useful for understanding epidemiologic trends and transmission dynamics, and for making decisions about implementation of dengue control programs. A logistical challenge to seroprevalence surveys is the collection and transport of serum samples. For conducting large and repeated dengue serosurveys, dried blood spots (DBS) would allow easier sample collection, shipment, transport, and storage than standard serum collection methods. Further evidence is needed to understand how well DBS performs compared with standard serum collection methods in laboratory assays. We evaluated the detection of anti-dengue antibodies by IgG indirect ELISA when using DBS compared with sera. Specimens were collected from healthy children in Cebu, Philippines, who would be 9-14 years of age at the time of a mass dengue vaccination program. Using an ELISA index value cutoff of 0.9, 1,285/1,488 (86.4%) of the DBS were seropositive and 203 (13.6%) were seronegative, compared with 1,292/1,488 (86.8%) seropositive and 196 (13.2%) seronegative serum samples. Compared with sera, the DBS method had a 98.3% sensitivity, 92.4% specificity, 98.9% positive predictive value, and 89.2% negative predictive value. Considering the advantages in terms of sample collection, shipment, and storage, DBS sampling may be appropriate for dengue population serosurveys.

摘要

登革热血清流行率数据对于了解流行病学趋势和传播动态以及决定实施登革热控制计划具有重要意义。血清流行率调查面临的一个后勤挑战是血清样本的采集和运输。对于进行大型和重复的登革热血清学调查,干血斑(DBS)比标准血清采集方法更便于样本采集、运输、运输和储存。需要进一步的证据来了解 DBS 在实验室检测中与标准血清采集方法的表现相比如何。我们评估了使用 DBS 与血清相比时 IgG 间接 ELISA 检测抗登革热抗体的情况。标本取自菲律宾宿务的健康儿童,他们在大规模登革热疫苗接种计划实施时将年满 9-14 岁。使用 ELISA 指数值截断值 0.9,与 1,285/1,488(86.4%)的 DBS 呈血清阳性,203(13.6%)呈血清阴性,而 1,292/1,488(86.8%)呈血清阳性和 196(13.2%)呈血清阴性。与血清相比,DBS 方法的敏感性为 98.3%,特异性为 92.4%,阳性预测值为 98.9%,阴性预测值为 89.2%。考虑到在样本采集、运输和储存方面的优势,DBS 采样可能适合登革热人群血清学调查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31da/7790110/063aa15bdce2/tpmd200937f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验