Ulep Valerie Gilbert, Zambrano Paul, Datu-Sanguyo Janice, Vilar-Compte Mireya, Belismelis Graciela Ma Teruel, Pérez-Escamilla Rafael, Carroll Grace J, Mathisen Roger
Philippine Institute for Development Studies, Quezon City, Philippines.
Alive & Thrive Southeast Asia, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Matern Child Nutr. 2021 Apr;17(2):e13098. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13098. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
In low- and middle-income countries, almost three-fourths of women in the labour force lack maternity protection. In the Philippines, current laws do not guarantee paid maternity leave to workers in the informal economy. A non-contributory maternity cash transfer to informal sector workers could be used to promote social equity and economic productivity and could provide health benefits by helping mothers meet their breastfeeding goals. The objective of the study is to provide a realistic cost estimate and to assess the financial feasibility of implementing a publicly financed, non-contributory maternity cash transfer programme to the informal sector in the Philippines. Using a costing framework developed in Mexico, the study estimated the annual cost of a maternity cash transfer programme. The methodology estimated the unit cost of the programme, the incremental coverage of maternity leave and expected number of enrollees. Different unit and incremental costs assumptions were used to provide a range of scenarios. Administrative costs for running the programme were included in the analysis. The annual financing need of implementing maternity cash transfer programme in the Philippines ranges from a minimum scenario of USD42 million (14-week maternity cash transfer) to a more ideal scenario of USD309 million (26-week maternity cash transfer). The latter is financially feasible as it is equivalent to less than 0.1% of the country's gross domestic product substantially lower than the share cost of not breastfeeding (0.7%). The annual cost of the programme is only 10% of the total cost of the largest conditional cash transfer programme.
在低收入和中等收入国家,劳动力中的女性近四分之三缺乏产假保护。在菲律宾,现行法律并未保障非正规经济部门工人的带薪产假。向非正规部门工人提供非缴费型产假现金转移支付,可用于促进社会公平和经济生产力,并可通过帮助母亲实现母乳喂养目标带来健康益处。本研究的目的是提供一个现实的成本估算,并评估在菲律宾实施一项由公共资金支持的、面向非正规部门的非缴费型产假现金转移支付计划的财务可行性。该研究采用在墨西哥制定的成本核算框架,估算了产假现金转移支付计划的年度成本。该方法估算了该计划的单位成本、产假覆盖范围的增量以及预期参保人数。使用了不同的单位成本和增量成本假设来提供一系列情景。分析中纳入了该计划的行政成本。在菲律宾实施产假现金转移支付计划的年度资金需求范围从最低情景的4200万美元(14周产假现金转移支付)到更理想情景的3.09亿美元(26周产假现金转移支付)。后者在财务上是可行的,因为它相当于该国国内生产总值的不到0.1%,大大低于未进行母乳喂养的成本占比(0.7%)。该计划的年度成本仅占最大的有条件现金转移支付计划总成本的10%。