Meo Diego, Falsaperla Daniele, Modica Alessandro, Calcagno Maria Carla, Libra Federica, Desiderio Carla, Palmucci Stefano, Foti Pietro Valerio, Musumeci Andrea Giovanni, Basile Antonio
Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G. F. Ingrassia" - Radiology I Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Radiol Med. 2021 Apr;126(4):630-635. doi: 10.1007/s11547-020-01299-4. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
To describe the variability of the radial artery (RA) diameters at 2 levels, proximal (pRA), within 2 cm to the styloid process, and distal (dRA) at the snuff box, both eligible accesses for percutaneous approach, and to correlate these diameters with population features.
A total of 700 patients (377 females, 323 males) have been enrolled from July 2018 to March 2019. The diameters of left and right RA were measured using ultrasound (US) examination. Diameters of pRA and dRA were compared between different sex and CRF (tabagism, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, BMI > 30, diabetes) using multivariate analysis and unpaired t test; the feasibility of radial access was evaluated considering a diameter ≥ of 2 mm as a cut-off or a vessel/sheath ratio >1. The time needed to perform each assessment of the four vessels was recorded.
The average proximal diameter of pRA was 2.58 mm (sd = 0.58 mm). The caliber of the dRA resulted 19.5% lower than the proximal one, with an average diameter of 1.99 mm (sd = 0.47 mm). On unpaired t test, a significant difference was reported for two of the parameters taken into account: sex and a BMI > 30.
Our results show that 88% of patients have an estimated radial artery caliber suitable for pTRA at US examination. Males and patients with BMI > 30 show a higher mean pRA and dRA; thus, they could be the ideal candidates for radial access.
描述桡动脉(RA)在两个水平的直径变异性,即距茎突2 cm内的近端(pRA)和鼻烟壶处的远端(dRA),这两个部位均适合经皮穿刺入路,并将这些直径与人群特征相关联。
2018年7月至2019年3月共纳入700例患者(女性377例,男性323例)。使用超声(US)检查测量左右RA的直径。采用多变量分析和非配对t检验比较不同性别和慢性肾功能衰竭(吸烟、高血压、高脂血症、BMI>30、糖尿病)患者的pRA和dRA直径;以直径≥2 mm作为截断值或血管/鞘管比率>1来评估桡动脉穿刺入路的可行性。记录对四条血管进行每次评估所需的时间。
pRA的平均近端直径为2.58 mm(标准差=0.58 mm)。dRA的管径比近端细19.5%,平均直径为1.99 mm(标准差=0.47 mm)。在非配对t检验中,在所考虑的两个参数上存在显著差异:性别和BMI>30。
我们的结果表明,88%的患者在超声检查时估计桡动脉管径适合经皮桡动脉介入治疗(pTRA)。男性和BMI>30的患者显示出较高的平均pRA和dRA;因此,他们可能是桡动脉穿刺入路的理想候选者。