文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

预测精神科专科就诊后自杀未遂或自杀死亡:一项使用瑞典国家登记数据的机器学习研究。

Predicting suicide attempt or suicide death following a visit to psychiatric specialty care: A machine learning study using Swedish national registry data.

机构信息

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2020 Nov 6;17(11):e1003416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003416. eCollection 2020 Nov.


DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003416
PMID:33156863
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7647056/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Suicide is a major public health concern globally. Accurately predicting suicidal behavior remains challenging. This study aimed to use machine learning approaches to examine the potential of the Swedish national registry data for prediction of suicidal behavior. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The study sample consisted of 541,300 inpatient and outpatient visits by 126,205 Sweden-born patients (54% female and 46% male) aged 18 to 39 (mean age at the visit: 27.3) years to psychiatric specialty care in Sweden between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2012. The most common psychiatric diagnoses at the visit were anxiety disorders (20.0%), major depressive disorder (16.9%), and substance use disorders (13.6%). A total of 425 candidate predictors covering demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status (SES), electronic medical records, criminality, as well as family history of disease and crime were extracted from the Swedish registry data. The sample was randomly split into an 80% training set containing 433,024 visits and a 20% test set containing 108,276 visits. Models were trained separately for suicide attempt/death within 90 and 30 days following a visit using multiple machine learning algorithms. Model discrimination and calibration were both evaluated. Among all eligible visits, 3.5% (18,682) were followed by a suicide attempt/death within 90 days and 1.7% (9,099) within 30 days. The final models were based on ensemble learning that combined predictions from elastic net penalized logistic regression, random forest, gradient boosting, and a neural network. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs) on the test set were 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.87-0.89) and 0.89 (95% CI = 0.88-0.90) for the outcome within 90 days and 30 days, respectively, both being significantly better than chance (i.e., AUC = 0.50) (p < 0.01). Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were reported at different risk thresholds. A limitation of our study is that our models have not yet been externally validated, and thus, the generalizability of the models to other populations remains unknown. CONCLUSIONS: By combining the ensemble method of multiple machine learning algorithms and high-quality data solely from the Swedish registers, we developed prognostic models to predict short-term suicide attempt/death with good discrimination and calibration. Whether novel predictors can improve predictive performance requires further investigation.

摘要

背景:自杀是一个全球性的主要公共卫生问题。准确预测自杀行为仍然具有挑战性。本研究旨在使用机器学习方法来检查瑞典国家登记数据预测自杀行为的潜力。

方法和发现:研究样本包括 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2012 年 12 月 31 日期间在瑞典接受精神科专科治疗的 541300 名 126205 名瑞典出生患者(54%为女性,46%为男性)的 541300 次门诊和住院就诊,年龄为 18 至 39 岁(就诊时的平均年龄:27.3 岁)。就诊时最常见的精神科诊断为焦虑症(20.0%)、重性抑郁症(16.9%)和物质使用障碍(13.6%)。从瑞典登记数据中提取了 425 个候选预测因子,涵盖人口统计学特征、社会经济地位(SES)、电子病历、犯罪行为以及疾病和犯罪家族史。样本被随机分为 80%的训练集,包含 433024 次就诊,20%的测试集包含 108276 次就诊。使用多种机器学习算法分别为就诊后 90 天和 30 天内自杀企图/死亡的情况训练模型。评估了模型的区分度和校准度。在所有符合条件的就诊中,有 3.5%(18682 人)在 90 天内发生自杀企图/死亡,1.7%(9099 人)在 30 天内发生自杀企图/死亡。最终模型基于集成学习,结合了弹性网惩罚逻辑回归、随机森林、梯度提升和神经网络的预测。测试集上的接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.88(95%置信区间[CI]:0.87-0.89)和 0.89(95%CI:0.88-0.90),用于预测 90 天和 30 天内的结局,均显著优于机会水平(即 AUC = 0.50)(p < 0.01)。报告了不同风险阈值下的敏感性、特异性和预测值。本研究的一个局限性是我们的模型尚未经过外部验证,因此模型在其他人群中的泛化能力尚不清楚。

结论:通过结合多种机器学习算法的集成方法和仅来自瑞典登记处的高质量数据,我们开发了具有良好区分度和校准度的预测短期自杀企图/死亡的预后模型。是否有新的预测指标可以提高预测性能,这需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa0/7647056/1a08b43181a6/pmed.1003416.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa0/7647056/c0b064bec83b/pmed.1003416.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa0/7647056/f0e98001549a/pmed.1003416.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa0/7647056/1a08b43181a6/pmed.1003416.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa0/7647056/c0b064bec83b/pmed.1003416.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa0/7647056/f0e98001549a/pmed.1003416.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa0/7647056/1a08b43181a6/pmed.1003416.g003.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Predicting suicide attempt or suicide death following a visit to psychiatric specialty care: A machine learning study using Swedish national registry data.

PLoS Med. 2020-11

[2]
Prediction models of suicide and non-fatal suicide attempt after discharge from a psychiatric inpatient stay: A machine learning approach on nationwide Danish registers.

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2023-12

[3]
Short term risk of non-fatal and fatal suicidal behaviours: the predictive validity of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale in a Swedish adult psychiatric population with a recent episode of self-harm.

BMC Psychiatry. 2018-10-1

[4]
What health records data are required for accurate prediction of suicidal behavior?

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019-12-1

[5]
Prediction of recurrent suicidal behavior among suicide attempters with Cox regression and machine learning: a 10-year prospective cohort study.

J Psychiatr Res. 2021-12

[6]
Predicting Suicide Attempts and Suicide Deaths Following Outpatient Visits Using Electronic Health Records.

Am J Psychiatry. 2018-5-24

[7]
Can Machine-learning Algorithms Predict Early Revision TKA in the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry?

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020-9

[8]
Identification of suicidal behavior among psychiatrically hospitalized adolescents using natural language processing and machine learning of electronic health records.

PLoS One. 2019-2-19

[9]
Prediction of Suicide Attempts Using Clinician Assessment, Patient Self-report, and Electronic Health Records.

JAMA Netw Open. 2022-1-4

[10]
Machine-Learning prediction of comorbid substance use disorders in ADHD youth using Swedish registry data.

J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020-12

引用本文的文献

[1]
Evaluating Machine Learning for Predicting Youth Suicidal Behavior Up to 1 Year After Contact With Mental-Health Specialty Care.

Clin Psychol Sci. 2025-5

[2]
A highly scalable deep learning language model for common risks prediction among psychiatric inpatients.

BMC Med. 2025-5-28

[3]
As Suicide Prediction With Artificial Intelligence Moves Forward, Barriers to Implementation Remain.

Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2023-12-26

[4]
An Explainable Artificial Intelligence Text Classifier for Suicidality Prediction in Youth Crisis Text Line Users: Development and Validation Study.

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025-1-29

[5]
Importance of variables from different time frames for predicting self-harm using health system data.

J Biomed Inform. 2024-12

[6]
Using machine learning to assist decision making in the assessment of mental health patients presenting to emergency departments.

Digit Health. 2024-11-11

[7]
Predicting suicidal behavior in individuals with depression over 50 years of age: Evidence from the UK biobank.

Digit Health. 2024-10-13

[8]
Importance of variables from different time frames for predicting self-harm using health system data.

medRxiv. 2024-9-20

[9]
Modeling Suicidality Risks and Understanding the Phenomenon of Suicidality Under the Loupe of Pandemic Context: National Findings of the COMET-G Study in the Russian Population.

Consort Psychiatr. 2022-7-5

[10]
The use of machine learning on administrative and survey data to predict suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a systematic review.

Front Psychiatry. 2024-3-4

本文引用的文献

[1]
All Models are Wrong, but are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneously.

J Mach Learn Res. 2019

[2]
Prediction of Sex-Specific Suicide Risk Using Machine Learning and Single-Payer Health Care Registry Data From Denmark.

JAMA Psychiatry. 2020-1-1

[3]
Machine Learning for Suicide Research-Can It Improve Risk Factor Identification?

JAMA Psychiatry. 2020-1-1

[4]
How accurate are suicide risk prediction models? Asking the right questions for clinical practice.

Evid Based Ment Health. 2019-6-27

[5]
The longitudinal integrated database for health insurance and labour market studies (LISA) and its use in medical research.

Eur J Epidemiol. 2019-3-30

[6]
Prediction Models for Suicide Attempts and Deaths: A Systematic Review and Simulation.

JAMA Psychiatry. 2019-6-1

[7]
Short-term prediction of suicidal thoughts and behaviors in adolescents: Can recent developments in technology and computational science provide a breakthrough?

J Affect Disord. 2019-3-6

[8]
The prediction of suicide in severe mental illness: development and validation of a clinical prediction rule (OxMIS).

Transl Psychiatry. 2019-2-25

[9]
Machine learning in suicide science: Applications and ethics.

Behav Sci Law. 2019-1-4

[10]
Suicide Risk and Mental Disorders.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018-9-17

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索