Isaacs Dayna J, Johnson Elizabeth J, Hofmann Erik R, Rangarajan Suresh, Vinson David R
University of California, Davis, School of Medicine.
Department of Emergency Medicine, UC Davis Health, Sacramento.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Nov 6;99(45):e23031. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023031.
The evidence for outpatient pulmonary embolism (PE) management apart from hospitalization is expanding. The availability and ease of direct oral anticoagulants have facilitated this transition. The literature, however, is sparse on the topic of comprehensive management of pulmonary embolism in the primary care clinic setting. As such, the role of the primary care physician in the complete diagnosis, risk stratification for outpatient eligibility, and initiation of treatment is unclear.
Case 1: A 33-year-old man with known heterozygous Factor V Leiden mutation and a remote history of deep vein thrombosis presented to his primary care physician's office with 2 days of mild pleuritic chest pain and a dry cough after a recent transcontinental flight. Case 2: A 48-year-old man with a complex medical history including recent transverse myelitis presented to his primary care family physician with dyspnea and pleuritic chest pain for 6 days.
Case 1: Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography that same afternoon showed multiple bilateral segmental and subsegmental emboli as well as several small pulmonary infarcts. Case 2: The patient's D-dimer was elevated at 1148 ng/mL. His physician ordered a computed tomographic pulmonary angiography, performed that evening, which showed segmental and subsegmental PE.
Both patients were contacted by their respective physicians shortly after their diagnoses and, in shared decision-making, opted for treatment at home with 5 days of enoxaparin followed by dabigatran.
Neither patient developed recurrence nor complications in the subsequent 3 months.
These cases, stratified as low risk using the American College of Chest Physicians criteria and the PE Severity Index, are among the first in the literature to illustrate comprehensive primary care-based outpatient PE management. Care was provided within an integrated delivery system with ready, timely access to laboratory, advanced radiology, and allied health services. This report sets the stage for investigating the public health implications of comprehensive primary care-based PE management, including cost-savings as well as enhanced patient follow-up and patient satisfaction.
除住院治疗外,门诊治疗肺栓塞(PE)的证据正在不断增加。直接口服抗凝剂的可获得性和易用性推动了这一转变。然而,关于基层医疗诊所环境中肺栓塞综合管理的文献却很稀少。因此,基层医疗医生在完整诊断、门诊治疗资格的风险分层以及治疗启动方面的作用尚不清楚。
病例1:一名33岁男性,已知患有杂合子因子V莱顿突变,有深静脉血栓形成的既往史,在最近一次跨大陆飞行后,因2天的轻度胸膜炎性胸痛和干咳就诊于其基层医疗医生办公室。病例2:一名48岁男性,有复杂的病史,包括近期的横贯性脊髓炎,因6天的呼吸困难和胸膜炎性胸痛就诊于其基层医疗家庭医生处。
病例1:当天下午的计算机断层扫描肺动脉造影显示双侧多个节段性和亚节段性栓子以及几处小的肺梗死。病例2:患者的D-二聚体升高至1148 ng/mL。其医生当晚安排了计算机断层扫描肺动脉造影,结果显示节段性和亚节段性肺栓塞。
两名患者在诊断后不久均被各自的医生联系,并在共同决策中选择在家接受治疗,先使用依诺肝素5天,随后使用达比加群。
两名患者在随后的3个月内均未出现复发或并发症。
根据美国胸科医师学会标准和肺栓塞严重程度指数,这些病例被分层为低风险,是文献中首批说明基于基层医疗的门诊肺栓塞综合管理的病例。在一个综合医疗服务系统中提供了护理,该系统能够方便、及时地获得实验室、高级放射学和联合健康服务。本报告为研究基于基层医疗的肺栓塞综合管理对公共卫生的影响奠定了基础,包括成本节约以及加强患者随访和提高患者满意度。