Filep Erica M, Murata Yuki, Endres Brad D, Kim Gyujin, Stearns Rebecca L, Casa Douglas J
Korey Stringer Institute, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-1110, USA.
Graduate School of Education and Human Development, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Nov 5;56(11):589. doi: 10.3390/medicina56110589.
The purpose of this systematic review is to synthesize the influence cooling modality has on survival with and without medical complications from exertional heat stroke (EHS) in sport and military populations. All peer-reviewed case reports or series involving EHS patients were searched in the following online databases: PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, Medline, CINAHL, Academic Search Premier, and the Cochrane Library: Central Registry of Clinical Trials. Cooling methods were subdivided into "adequate" (>0.15 °C/min) versus "insufficient" (<0.15 °C/min) based on previously published literature on EHS cooling rates. : 613 articles were assessed for quality and inclusion in the review. Thirty-two case reports representing 521 EHS patients met the inclusion criteria. Four hundred ninety-eight (498) patients survived EHS (95.58%) and 23 (4.41%) patients succumbed to complications. Fischer's Exact test on 2 × 2 contingency tables and relative risk ratios were calculated to determine if modality cooling rate was associated with patient outcomes. EHS patients that survived who were cooled with an insufficient cooling rate had a 4.57 times risk of medical complications compared to patients who were treated by adequate cooling methods, regardless of setting (RR = 4.57 (95%CI: 3.42, 6.28)). This is the largest EHS dataset yet compiled that analyzes the influence of cooling rate on patient outcomes. Zero patients died (0/521, 0.00%) when treatment included a modality with an adequate cooling rate. Conversely, 23 patients died (23/521, 4.41%) with insufficient cooling. One hundred seventeen patients (117/521, 22.46%) survived with medical complications when treatment involved an insufficient cooling rate, whereas, only four patients had complications (4/521, 0.77%) despite adequate cooling. Cooling rates >0.15 °C/min for EHS patients were significantly associated with surviving EHS without medical complications. In order to provide the best standard of care for EHS patients, an aggressive cooling rate >0.15 °C/min can maximize survival without medical complications after exercise-induced hyperthermia.
本系统评价的目的是综合分析降温方式对运动和军事人群中发生劳力性热射病(EHS)且伴有或不伴有医学并发症患者生存情况的影响。在以下在线数据库中检索了所有涉及EHS患者的同行评审病例报告或系列研究:PubMed、Scopus、SPORTDiscus、Medline、CINAHL、Academic Search Premier和Cochrane图书馆:临床试验中央注册库。根据先前发表的关于EHS降温速率的文献,将降温方法分为“充分”(>0.15℃/分钟)和“不充分”(<0.15℃/分钟)两类。对613篇文章进行了质量评估并纳入本综述。32篇代表521例EHS患者的病例报告符合纳入标准。498例(498/521)患者从EHS中存活(95.58%),23例(4.41%)患者死于并发症。对2×2列联表进行Fisher精确检验并计算相对风险比,以确定降温速率方式是否与患者预后相关。无论在何种环境下,与采用充分降温方法治疗的患者相比,以不充分降温速率降温的存活EHS患者发生医学并发症的风险高4.57倍(RR = 4.57(95%CI:3.42,6.28))。这是迄今为止汇编的最大的EHS数据集,分析了降温速率对患者预后的影响。当治疗采用充分降温速率方式时,无患者死亡(0/521,0.00%)。相反,降温不充分时,23例患者死亡(23/521,4.41%)。当治疗采用不充分降温速率时,117例患者(117/521,22.46%)存活并伴有医学并发症,而尽管采用了充分降温,仅有4例患者出现并发症(4/521,0.77%)。EHS患者降温速率>0.15℃/分钟与无医学并发症存活EHS显著相关。为了为EHS患者提供最佳护理标准,积极的降温速率>0.15℃/分钟可使运动性体温过高后无医学并发症的存活率最大化。