Sun Li, Li Ningning, Jia Lu, Zhang Cui, Wang Shuxia, Jiao Ronghong, Wang Li, Ye Yuquan
Department of Ultrasound, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland).
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland).
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Nov 10;26:e926215. doi: 10.12659/MSM.926215.
BACKGROUND Superb microvascular imaging (SMI) is a new blood flow imaging technique used to evaluate microvascular blood flow. This study evaluated whether SMI was superior to color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) for evaluating placental microcirculation. MATERIAL AND METHODS This prospective study included pregnant women in their third trimester who were evaluated at General Hospital of Hebei Province from February to June 2017. The distribution of vascular patterns, including pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI), S/D, time average velocity (TAV), and vessels per unit area, were evaluated by SMI and CDFI. RESULTS This study evaluated 110 pregnant women of mean age 29.53 years. SMI and CDFI yielded statistically significant differences in PI (0.76 vs. 0.62), RI (0.71 vs. 0.47), S/D (2.23 vs. 1.71), TAV (14.35 vs. 22.45), and vessels per unit area (0.26 vs. 0.05) (P<0.001 each). The weight of the pregnant women correlated positively with RI (P=0.048) and negatively with vessels per unit area (P=0.040) as determined by SMI. Weeks of gestation correlated negatively correlated with PI (P=0.008), RI (P=0.004), S/D (P=0.015), and vessels per unit area (P=0.014) by CDFI, and positively with RI (P<0.001) and S/D (P=0.001) by SMI. The results of stratified comparisons of CDFI and SMI based on age, weight, and gestational weeks were consistent overall. CONCLUSIONS SMI, which has a higher rate of placental vascularity, a clearer display of capillaries, a greater sensitivity to low flow, and an advantage in displaying microcirculation of the placenta, can serve as a new and effective method of evaluating placental blood flow.
背景 超微血管成像(SMI)是一种用于评估微血管血流的新型血流成像技术。本研究评估了SMI在评估胎盘微循环方面是否优于彩色多普勒血流成像(CDFI)。
材料与方法 这项前瞻性研究纳入了2017年2月至6月在河北省总医院接受评估的孕晚期孕妇。通过SMI和CDFI评估血管模式分布,包括搏动指数(PI)、阻力指数(RI)、S/D、时间平均速度(TAV)和单位面积血管数。
结果 本研究评估了110名平均年龄为29.53岁的孕妇。SMI和CDFI在PI(0.76对0.62)、RI(0.71对0.47)、S/D(2.23对1.71)、TAV(14.35对22.45)和单位面积血管数(0.二十六对0.05)方面产生了统计学上的显著差异(每项P<0.001)。根据SMI测定,孕妇体重与RI呈正相关(P=0.048),与单位面积血管数呈负相关(P=0.040)。孕周与CDFI测定的PI(P=0.008)、RI(P=0.004)、S/D(P=0.015)和单位面积血管数呈负相关,与SMI测定的RI(P<0.001)和S/D(P=0.001)呈正相关。基于年龄、体重和孕周的CDFI和SMI分层比较结果总体一致。
结论 SMI具有胎盘血管化率更高、毛细血管显示更清晰、对低流量更敏感以及在显示胎盘微循环方面具有优势,可作为评估胎盘血流的一种新的有效方法。