TIMI Study Group, Boston, MA (N.A.M., F.K.K., F.N., G.M.M., R.P.G., B.M.S., M.L.O'D., E.M.A., E.B., M.S.S., C.T.R.).
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (N.A.M., F.K.K., F.N., G.M.M., R.P.G, B.M.S., M.L.O'D., C.P.C., D.L.B., E.M.A., E.B., M.S.S., C.T.R.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Circulation. 2021 Feb 2;143(5):470-478. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.051927. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
Genome-wide association studies have identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms that are associated with an increased risk of stroke. We sought to determine whether a genetic risk score (GRS) could identify subjects at higher risk for ischemic stroke after accounting for traditional clinical risk factors in 5 trials across the spectrum of cardiometabolic disease.
Subjects who had consented for genetic testing and who were of European ancestry from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 (Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation), SOLID-TIMI 52 (Stabilization of Plaques Using Darapladib), SAVOR-TIMI 53 (Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus), PEGASUS-TIMI 54 (Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin), and FOURIER (Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Patients With Elevated Risk) trials were included in this analysis. A set of 32 single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with ischemic stroke was used to calculate a GRS in each patient and identify tertiles of genetic risk. A Cox model was used to calculate hazard ratios for ischemic stroke across genetic risk groups, adjusted for clinical risk factors.
In 51 288 subjects across the 5 trials, a total of 960 subjects had an ischemic stroke over a median follow-up period of 2.5 years. After adjusting for clinical risk factors, a higher GRS was strongly and independently associated with increased risk for ischemic stroke ( trend=0.009). In comparison with individuals in the lowest third of the GRS, individuals in the middle and top tertiles of the GRS had adjusted hazard ratios of 1.15 (95% CI, 0.98-1.36) and 1.24 (95% CI 1.05-1.45) for ischemic stroke, respectively. Stratification into subgroups revealed that the performance of the GRS appeared stronger in the primary prevention cohort with an adjusted hazard ratio for the top versus lowest tertile of 1.27 (95% CI, 1.04-1.53), in comparison with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.06 (95% CI, 0.81-1.41) in subjects with previous stroke. In an exploratory analysis of patients with atrial fibrillation and CHADS-VASc score of 2, high genetic risk conferred a 4-fold higher risk of stroke and an absolute risk equivalent to those with CHADS-VASc score of 3.
Across a broad spectrum of subjects with cardiometabolic disease, a 32-single-nucleotide polymorphism GRS was a strong, independent predictor of ischemic stroke. In patients with atrial fibrillation but lower CHADS-VASc scores, the GRS identified patients with risk comparable to those with higher CHADS-VASc scores.
全基因组关联研究已经确定了与中风风险增加相关的单核苷酸多态性。我们试图确定在涵盖心血管代谢疾病谱的 5 项试验中,在考虑到传统临床危险因素后,遗传风险评分(GRS)是否可以识别出缺血性中风风险较高的受试者。
从 ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48(房颤中新型 Xa 因子抗凝的有效抗凝)、SOLID-TIMI 52(达拉普立达稳定斑块)、SAVOR-TIMI 53(糖尿病患者使用沙格列汀的血管结局记录评估)、PEGASUS-TIMI 54(使用替卡格雷与安慰剂相比在既往心脏病发作患者中预防心血管事件)和 FOURIER(用 PCSK9 抑制剂进一步降低高危患者心血管风险)试验中,纳入了同意进行基因检测且为欧洲血统的受试者。使用与缺血性中风相关的 32 个单核苷酸多态性来计算每个患者的 GRS,并确定遗传风险的三分位数。使用 Cox 模型计算不同遗传风险组的缺血性中风风险比,调整临床危险因素。
在 5 项试验中的 51288 名受试者中,中位随访 2.5 年后共有 960 名受试者发生缺血性中风。在调整临床危险因素后,较高的 GRS 与缺血性中风风险的增加呈强烈且独立相关(趋势=0.009)。与 GRS 最低三分位的个体相比,GRS 中部分和最高三分位的个体缺血性中风的校正风险比分别为 1.15(95%CI,0.98-1.36)和 1.24(95%CI 1.05-1.45)。分层到亚组中发现,在主要预防队列中,GRS 的表现更强,最高与最低三分位的校正风险比为 1.27(95%CI,1.04-1.53),而在有既往中风的受试者中,校正风险比为 1.06(95%CI,0.81-1.41)。在房颤和 CHADS-VASc 评分为 2 的患者的探索性分析中,高遗传风险使中风风险增加了 4 倍,与 CHADS-VASc 评分为 3 的患者的绝对风险相当。
在涵盖心血管代谢疾病谱的广泛受试者中,32 个单核苷酸多态性 GRS 是缺血性中风的一个强有力的独立预测因素。在房颤但 CHADS-VASc 评分较低的患者中,GRS 确定了与 CHADS-VASc 评分较高的患者风险相当的患者。