Eye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases , Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020 Dec;17(12):1333-1340. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1848541. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
: To evaluate the agreement between anew UBM and an SS-OCT. : The scans of the right eye of each volunteer were obtained using the two devices. Data were fitted and recorded including: central corneal thickness (CCT), aqueous depth (AQD) (the distance from endothelium to lens), angle-to-angle distance (ATA), lens thickness (LT), diameter of the lens in the horizontal direction (LDia: distance between the sharp angles on both sides of the lens, LDia: distance between the vertex of the circular arcs on both sides of the lens), anterior and posterior corneal radius (Rf and Rb). : 25 eyes were included in this study. It could be seen that the differences in CCT, LDia, Rf measured by the two instruments were not statistically significant. Bland-Altman analysis plots of CCT, LDia and Rf showed mean differences of 0.2 µm, 0.01mm and 0.0mm for the 2 devices, respectively. : The values of CCT, LDia and Rf obtained via two instruments were not clinically interchangeable and the AQD, ATA, LT, and Rb have poor agreement affected by accommodation. We can estimate the real lens diameter by subtracting 0.61 ± 0.43mm when the lens diameter can only be simulated with SS-OCT.
: 评估新型 UBM 和 SS-OCT 的一致性。 : 使用两种设备获取每位志愿者右眼的扫描结果。拟合并记录的数据包括:中央角膜厚度 (CCT)、房水深度 (AQD)(从内皮到晶状体的距离)、角-角距离 (ATA)、晶状体厚度 (LT)、晶状体水平方向直径 (LDia:晶状体两侧锐角之间的距离,LDia:晶状体两侧圆弧顶点之间的距离)、前角膜半径 (Rf) 和后角膜半径 (Rb)。 : 本研究共纳入 25 只眼。可以看出,两种仪器测量的 CCT、LDia、Rf 差异无统计学意义。CCT、LDia 和 Rf 的 Bland-Altman 分析图显示,两种仪器的平均差异分别为 0.2μm、0.01mm 和 0.0mm。 : 两种仪器测量的 CCT、LDia 和 Rf 值在临床上不可互换,AQD、ATA、LT 和 Rb 的一致性较差,易受调节影响。当只能用 SS-OCT 模拟晶状体直径时,我们可以通过减去 0.61±0.43mm 来估计真实的晶状体直径。