Cercenado E, Edelstein P H, Gosting L H, Sturge J C
Legionnaires' Disease Laboratory, Veterans Administration, Wadsworth Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90073.
J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Nov;25(11):2163-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.11.2163-2167.1987.
Two different monoclonal antibodies directed against Legionella micdadei and L. dumoffii (Genetic Systems Corp., Seattle, Wash.) were evaluated for their specificity and ability to detect L. micdadei and L. dumoffii in human and animal clinical samples and bacterial isolates in an indirect immunofluorescence assay. All three frozen sputum samples and all three Formalin-fixed sputum and liver samples from patients with culture-documented L. micdadei pneumonia were positive when tested with the L. micdadei monoclonal antibody. A Formalin-preserved lung sample from a patient with culture-documented L. dumoffii pneumonia was positive with its homologous monoclonal antibody. No cross-staining reactions were found with either monoclonal antibody on any of 25 human sputum samples tested from patients without Legionella infections. A total of 66 Legionella strains and 56 non-Legionella strains including 22 Pseudomonas strains and 34 other bacterial strains were studied. No cross-staining reactions were found except in Staphylococcus aureus Cowan 1 ATCC 12598. The lower limit of detection in seeded sputum samples was about 7 X 10(4) cells per ml for both monoclonal antibodies. Lung and tracheal lavage specimens from L. micdadei- or L. dumoffii-infected guinea pigs showed specific staining only with their respective monoclonal antibodies. The monoclonal antibodies stained homologous bacteria slightly less intensely than did the polyclonal antisera, but the signal-to-noise ratio was considerably higher for the monoclonal antibodies. No differences in sensitivity of staining of clinical specimens or bacterial isolates were noted between the monoclonal antibodies and the polyclonal reagents for L. micdadei and L. dumoffii (Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Ga., and BioDx, Denville, N.J. These monoclonal antibodies ae sensitive and specific, making them good candidates for laboratory diagnostic purposes.
针对米克戴德军团菌和杜莫夫军团菌(基因系统公司,华盛顿州西雅图)的两种不同单克隆抗体,在间接免疫荧光试验中,对其在人类和动物临床样本以及细菌分离物中检测米克戴德军团菌和杜莫夫军团菌的特异性和能力进行了评估。用米克戴德军团菌单克隆抗体检测时,所有3份冷冻痰样本以及所有3份来自培养确诊为米克戴德军团菌肺炎患者的福尔马林固定痰和肝样本均呈阳性。一份来自培养确诊为杜莫夫军团菌肺炎患者的福尔马林保存肺样本,用其同源单克隆抗体检测呈阳性。在对25份来自无军团菌感染患者的人类痰样本进行检测时,两种单克隆抗体均未发现交叉染色反应。共研究了66株军团菌菌株和56株非军团菌菌株,包括22株假单胞菌菌株和34株其他细菌菌株。除了金黄色葡萄球菌考恩1 ATCC 12598外,未发现交叉染色反应。两种单克隆抗体在接种痰样本中的检测下限均约为每毫升7×10⁴个细胞。来自感染米克戴德军团菌或杜莫夫军团菌的豚鼠的肺和气管灌洗标本仅用各自的单克隆抗体呈现特异性染色。单克隆抗体对同源细菌的染色强度略低于多克隆抗血清,但单克隆抗体的信噪比要高得多。对于米克戴德军团菌和杜莫夫军团菌,单克隆抗体与多克隆试剂在临床样本或细菌分离物染色敏感性方面未发现差异(疾病控制中心,佐治亚州亚特兰大,以及BioDx,新泽西州丹维尔)。这些单克隆抗体灵敏且特异,使其成为实验室诊断的良好候选物。