Basille B A, Easley K A, Hall G S, Washington J A
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio 44106.
J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Nov;25(11):2221-2. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.11.2221-2222.1987.
A paired clinical study compared bacterial and fungal recovery from 4,553 blood cultures processed by the conventional Isolator (Du Pont Co.) and a revised Isolator consisting of a single-stoppered, round-bottom tube containing the same ingredients as the conventional tube except for an inert fluorochemical. Excluding contaminants, there were 425 positive blood cultures with 450 isolates representing 208 patients. There were no statistically significant differences between systems in the number of positive cultures or patients with positive cultures for each organism group studied, nor were there any statistically significant differences between systems in the time required for detection of positive cultures.
一项配对临床研究比较了使用传统伊索莱特（杜邦公司）和改良伊索莱特处理的4553份血培养物中的细菌和真菌回收率。改良伊索莱特是一种单塞圆底管，除了一种惰性含氟化合物外，其所含成分与传统管相同。排除污染物后，有425份血培养阳性，共分离出450株菌株，涉及208名患者。在所研究的每个生物体组中，两种系统在阳性培养物数量或培养物阳性的患者数量方面没有统计学上的显著差异，在检测阳性培养物所需时间方面也没有统计学上的显著差异。
