• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双用户中电子烟与香烟 24 小时心血管效应比较。

Twenty-Four-Hour Cardiovascular Effects of Electronic Cigarettes Compared With Cigarette Smoking in Dual Users.

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacology Research Program Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine University of California San Francisco CA.

Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education University of California San Francisco CA.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Dec;9(23):e017317. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017317. Epub 2020 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.120.017317
PMID:33208019
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7763797/
Abstract

Background Cardiovascular safety is an important consideration regarding the benefits versus risks of electronic cigarette use (EC) for public health. The single-use cardiovascular effects of EC have been well studied but may not reflect effects of ad libitum use throughout the day. We aimed to compare the circadian hemodynamic effects as well as 24-hour biomarkers of oxidative stress, and platelet aggregation and inflammation, with ad libitum cigarette smoking (CS) versus EC versus no tobacco product use. Methods and Results Thirty-six healthy dual CS and EC users participated in a crossover study in a confined research setting. Circadian heart rate, blood pressure and plasma nicotine levels, 24-hour urinary catecholamines, 8-isoprostane and 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2, and plasma interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 were compared in CS, EC, and no nicotine conditions. Over 24 hours, and during daytime, heart rate and blood pressure were higher in CS and EC compared with no tobacco product conditions (<0.01). Heart rate on average was higher with CS versus EC. Urinary catecholamines, 8-isoprostane, and 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 were not significantly different, but plasma IL-6 and IL-8 were higher with both CS and EC compared with no tobacco product (<0.01). Conclusions CS and EC had similar 24-hour patterns of hemodynamic effects compared with no tobacco product, with a higher average heart rate with CS versus EC, and similar effects on biomarkers of inflammation. EC may pose some cardiovascular risk, particularly to smokers with underlying cardiovascular disease, but may also provide a harm reduction opportunity for smokers willing to switch entirely to EC. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT02470754.

摘要

背景

心血管安全性是权衡电子烟使用的健康效益与风险时需要考虑的一个重要因素。电子烟单次使用的心血管效应已经得到了充分研究,但可能无法反映全天随意使用的效果。我们旨在比较昼夜节律性血液动力学效应以及 24 小时氧化应激、血小板聚集和炎症的生物标志物,比较随意吸烟(CS)与电子烟(EC)与不使用任何烟草制品的情况。

方法和结果

36 名健康的 CS 和 EC 双重使用者参与了一个在封闭研究环境中的交叉研究。在 CS、EC 和无尼古丁条件下比较了昼夜心率、血压和血浆尼古丁水平、24 小时尿儿茶酚胺、8-异前列腺素和 11-脱氢血栓烷 B2 以及血浆白细胞介素-6 和白细胞介素-8。在 24 小时内和白天,CS 和 EC 的心率和血压均高于无烟草制品条件(<0.01)。与 EC 相比,CS 的平均心率更高。尿儿茶酚胺、8-异前列腺素和 11-脱氢血栓烷 B2 没有显著差异,但 CS 和 EC 与无烟草制品相比,血浆 IL-6 和 IL-8 更高(<0.01)。

结论

CS 和 EC 与无烟草制品相比,具有相似的 24 小时血液动力学效应模式,CS 的平均心率高于 EC,且对炎症生物标志物的影响相似。EC 可能带来一些心血管风险,特别是对患有潜在心血管疾病的吸烟者,但对于愿意完全改用 EC 的吸烟者来说,也可能提供减少危害的机会。

注册网址

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;独特标识符:NCT02470754。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3192/7763797/83ca1f962b4f/JAH3-9-e017317-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3192/7763797/375cf8a644a9/JAH3-9-e017317-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3192/7763797/a4e4e78bfb8b/JAH3-9-e017317-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3192/7763797/20b80ec78884/JAH3-9-e017317-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3192/7763797/83ca1f962b4f/JAH3-9-e017317-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3192/7763797/375cf8a644a9/JAH3-9-e017317-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3192/7763797/a4e4e78bfb8b/JAH3-9-e017317-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3192/7763797/20b80ec78884/JAH3-9-e017317-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3192/7763797/83ca1f962b4f/JAH3-9-e017317-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Twenty-Four-Hour Cardiovascular Effects of Electronic Cigarettes Compared With Cigarette Smoking in Dual Users.双用户中电子烟与香烟 24 小时心血管效应比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Dec;9(23):e017317. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017317. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
2
Differential effects of tobacco cigarettes and electronic cigarettes on endothelial function in healthy young people.烟草香烟和电子烟对健康年轻人内皮功能的差异影响。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2020 Sep 1;319(3):H547-H556. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00307.2020. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
3
Twenty-four-hour subjective and pharmacological effects of ad-libitum electronic and combustible cigarette use among dual users.双用电子烟和可燃烟者随意使用时的 24 小时主观和药理学效应。
Addiction. 2020 Jun;115(6):1149-1159. doi: 10.1111/add.14931. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
4
Acute and chronic sympathomimetic effects of e-cigarette and tobacco cigarette smoking: role of nicotine and non-nicotine constituents.电子烟和香烟吸烟的急性和慢性拟交感作用:尼古丁和非尼古丁成分的作用。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2020 Aug 1;319(2):H262-H270. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00192.2020. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
5
Biomarkers of Tobacco Exposure Decrease After Smokers Switch to an E-Cigarette or Nicotine Gum.吸烟者改用电子烟或尼古丁口香糖后,烟草暴露的生物标志物会下降。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Aug 19;21(9):1239-1247. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty140.
6
Arrhythmogenic effects of acute electronic cigarette compared to tobacco cigarette smoking in people living with HIV.急性电子烟与吸烟对 HIV 感染者心律失常影响的比较。
Physiol Rep. 2024 Jul;12(14):e16158. doi: 10.14814/phy2.16158.
7
Characterization of Volatile Organic Compound Metabolites in Cigarette Smokers, Electronic Nicotine Device Users, Dual Users, and Nonusers of Tobacco.对吸烟者、电子烟使用者、双重使用者和非烟草使用者的挥发性有机化合物代谢产物进行特征描述。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Feb 6;22(2):264-272. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz021.
8
Acute Effects of Heat-Not-Burn, Electronic Vaping, and Traditional Tobacco Combustion Cigarettes: The Sapienza University of Rome-Vascular Assessment of Proatherosclerotic Effects of Smoking ( SUR - VAPES ) 2 Randomized Trial.《热不燃、电子雾化和传统烟草燃烧卷烟的急性效应:罗马萨皮恩扎大学-血管评估吸烟致动脉粥样硬化前效应研究(SUR-VAPES)2 随机试验》。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Mar 19;8(6):e010455. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010455.
9
E-cigarettes and cigarettes worsen peripheral and central hemodynamics as well as arterial stiffness: A randomized, double-blinded pilot study.电子烟和香烟会加重外周和中枢血液动力学以及动脉僵硬:一项随机、双盲的初步研究。
Vasc Med. 2018 Oct;23(5):419-425. doi: 10.1177/1358863X18779694. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
10
Have combustible cigarettes met their match? The nicotine delivery profiles and harmful constituent exposures of second-generation and third-generation electronic cigarette users.可燃香烟遇到对手了吗?第二代和第三代电子烟使用者的尼古丁递送情况及有害成分暴露情况。
Tob Control. 2017 Mar;26(e1):e23-e28. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053041. Epub 2016 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Cigarette smoke-free home adoption attempts among formerly homeless adults living in permanent supportive housing.居住在永久性支持性住房中的曾经无家可归成年人尝试采用无烟家庭环境。
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2025 Jul 22;16:100363. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100363. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Health outcomes of electronic cigarettes.电子烟的健康影响。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2024 Aug 20;137(16):1903-1911. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003098. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
3
Harm perceptions across vaping product features: An on-line cross-sectional survey of adults who smoke and/or vape in the United Kingdom.

本文引用的文献

1
Correlation between biomarkers of exposure, effect and potential harm in the urine of electronic cigarette users.电子烟使用者尿液中的暴露、效应和潜在危害生物标志物之间的相关性。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020 Feb;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000452.
2
Systemic biomarkers in electronic cigarette users: implications for noninvasive assessment of vaping-associated pulmonary injuries.电子烟使用者的全身生物标志物:对与吸电子烟相关的肺部损伤进行无创评估的意义。
ERJ Open Res. 2019 Dec 23;5(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00182-2019. eCollection 2019 Oct.
3
Selected Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents Levels in Commercial e-Cigarettes.
对各类电子烟产品特点的危害认知:针对英国吸烟和/或吸电子烟成年人的在线横断面调查。
Addiction. 2025 Mar;120(3):524-538. doi: 10.1111/add.16572. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
4
An observational human laboratory assessment of nicotine delivery, vaping topography and subjective effects of usual brand electronic cigarette use among young adults.一项针对年轻人中使用常见品牌电子烟的尼古丁输送、吸蒸行为特征及主观影响的人体观察性实验室评估。
Addiction. 2025 Mar;120(3):503-513. doi: 10.1111/add.16531. Epub 2024 May 27.
5
Metabolic and Other Endocrine Elements with Regard to Lifestyle Choices: Focus on E-Cigarettes.与生活方式选择相关的代谢及其他内分泌因素:聚焦电子烟。
Metabolites. 2023 Dec 8;13(12):1192. doi: 10.3390/metabo13121192.
6
Characterization and Summarization of the Impact of Electronic Cigarettes on the Cardiovascular System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.电子烟对心血管系统影响的特征分析与综述:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2023 May 26;15(5):e39528. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39528. eCollection 2023 May.
7
An integral perspective of canonical cigarette and e-cigarette-related cardiovascular toxicity based on the adverse outcome pathway framework.基于不良结局路径框架的典型香烟和电子烟相关心血管毒性的整体观点。
J Adv Res. 2023 Jun;48:227-257. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2022.08.012. Epub 2022 Aug 21.
8
Electronic Cigarette Use and the Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases.电子烟使用与心血管疾病风险
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 7;9:879726. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.879726. eCollection 2022.
9
Clinical Pharmacology of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS): Implications for Benefits and Risks in the Promotion of the Combusted Tobacco Endgame.电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)的临床药理学:对促进燃烧烟草终结策略中获益与风险的影响。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Aug;61 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S18-S36. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1915.
商业电子烟中选定的有害和潜在有害成分水平。
Chem Res Toxicol. 2020 Feb 17;33(2):657-668. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00470. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
4
Twenty-four-hour subjective and pharmacological effects of ad-libitum electronic and combustible cigarette use among dual users.双用电子烟和可燃烟者随意使用时的 24 小时主观和药理学效应。
Addiction. 2020 Jun;115(6):1149-1159. doi: 10.1111/add.14931. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
5
Analysis of Toxic Metals in Liquid from Electronic Cigarettes.分析电子烟液体中的有毒金属。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 13;16(22):4450. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224450.
6
Cardiovascular Effects of Switching From Tobacco Cigarettes to Electronic Cigarettes.从传统香烟切换到电子烟对心血管的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Dec 24;74(25):3112-3120. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.067. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
7
Differences in nicotine intake and effects from electronic and combustible cigarettes among dual users.双重使用者吸食电子烟和可燃香烟的尼古丁摄入量和影响的差异。
Addiction. 2020 Apr;115(4):757-767. doi: 10.1111/add.14884. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
8
Comparison of Systemic Exposure to Toxic and/or Carcinogenic Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) during Vaping, Smoking, and Abstention.蒸气吸入、吸烟和不吸烟时全身接触有毒和/或致癌挥发性有机化合物(VOC)的比较。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Feb;13(2):153-162. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-19-0356. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
9
The Effect of Electronic Cigarette User Modifications and E-liquid Adulteration on the Particle Size Profile of an Aerosolized Product.电子烟用户改装和烟液掺假对气溶胶化产品粒径分布的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 15;9(1):10221. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46387-2.
10
A Randomized Trial of E-Cigarettes versus Nicotine-Replacement Therapy.一项电子烟与尼古丁替代疗法的随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 14;380(7):629-637. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808779. Epub 2019 Jan 30.