Suppr超能文献

厄瓜多尔的 Fitzpatrick 皮肤光型分类的有效性。

Validity of the Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification in Ecuador.

机构信息

At the Universidad de Las Américas, in Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador, Martha Maria Fors Lopez, PhD, MD, MSc, is Researcher and Professor, and Paloma de las Mercedes González Fors, BS, is Librarian. Carmen Elena Viada González, MSc, is Statistician, Center of Molecular Immunology, Havana, Cuba. Kirsten Falcon, MSN, RN, is Professor of Nursing, Universidad de Las Américas. Santiago Palacios-Alvarez, MD, is Professor, Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, Quito. Acknowledgment: The authors thank the study participants, the Centro de la Piel for its valuable contribution, and the Universidad de Las Américas for funding travel and study materials and equipment (grant no. MED.MF.17.08). The authors have disclosed no other financial relationships related to this article. Submitted April 3, 2020; accepted in revised form May 6, 2020.

出版信息

Adv Skin Wound Care. 2020 Dec;33(12):1-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000721168.40561.a3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification (FSPC) is the most common tool used to assess skin phototype in White populations according to the amount of pigment the skin has and its reaction to sun exposure. Scientific evidence about the use of this scale for persons with darker skin is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity of the FSPC for Ecuadorians.

METHODS

This observational cross-sectional study recruited participants of both sexes between 40 and 90 years of age living in a rural area of Quito, Ecuador. Cronbach α values were used to assess the internal consistency of the scale. Construct validity was assessed with confirmatory factor analysis.

RESULTS

The internal consistency coefficients indicated that the reliability of the responses to the scale was fair. Total α value was .515, whereas the α values of the two factors were .42 and .67. Most item-to-factor correlations had a low to moderate magnitude, ranging from r = 0.30 to 0.37. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a two-factor solution and achieved good overall fit as indicated by root mean square error of approximation = 0.08, and nonnormed fit index = 0.88 was mediocre. Goodness-of-fit χ = 177.10, P < .001. The factor loads were greater than 0.30, ranging from 0.30 to 0.99.

CONCLUSIONS

The FSPC showed an acceptable construct validity and a fair internal consistency. The five-item scale could potentially be used as an effective instrument for assessing skin phototype in non-White people.

摘要

背景

根据皮肤的色素含量及其对阳光暴露的反应,Fitzpatrick 皮肤光型分类(FSPC)是评估白种人皮肤光型最常用的工具。关于该量表在肤色较深人群中的应用,科学证据有限。

目的

评估 FSPC 在厄瓜多尔人群中的内部一致性、可靠性和结构效度。

方法

本观察性横断面研究招募了居住在厄瓜多尔基多农村地区的 40 至 90 岁的男女参与者。采用 Cronbach α 值评估量表的内部一致性。采用验证性因子分析评估结构效度。

结果

内部一致性系数表明,对量表的反应可靠性为中等。总 α 值为.515,而两个因子的 α 值分别为.42 和.67。大多数项目与因子的相关性具有低到中等的强度,范围从 r = 0.30 到 0.37。验证性因子分析支持两因素解决方案,并表现出良好的整体拟合度,近似均方根误差为 0.08,非标准化拟合指数为 0.88 为中等。拟合优度 χ = 177.10,P <.001。因子负荷大于 0.30,范围从 0.30 到 0.99。

结论

FSPC 显示出可接受的结构效度和中等的内部一致性。五分量表可能可作为评估非白种人皮肤光型的有效工具。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Photoprotection in specific populations: Children and people of color.特定人群的光保护:儿童和有色人种。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Mar;76(3S1):S110-S121. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.09.039. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
6
The impact of skin colour on human photobiological responses.肤色对人体光生物学反应的影响。
Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2016 Nov;29(6):607-618. doi: 10.1111/pcmr.12511. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
7
Melasma and assessment of the quality of life in Brazilian women.巴西女性的黄褐斑与生活质量评估。
An Bras Dermatol. 2015 Mar-Apr;90(2):196-200. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20152771.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验