Beyond Confounding: Identifying Selection Bias in Observational Pulmonary and Critical Care Research.
作者信息
Admon Andrew J, Bohnert Amy S B, Cooke Colin R, Taylor Stephanie Parks
机构信息
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, and.
University of Michigan Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
出版信息
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Jul;19(7):1084-1089. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202110-1188PS.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Beyond Confounding: Identifying Selection Bias in Observational Pulmonary and Critical Care Research.超越混杂因素：识别观察性肺部和重症医学研究中的选择偏倚
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Jul;19(7):1084-1089. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202110-1188PS.
2
The challenge of selection bias and confounding in palliative care research.姑息治疗研究中选择偏倚和混杂因素的挑战。
J Palliat Med. 2009 Feb;12(2):181-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.9672.
3
Definitions of Bias in Clinical Research.临床研究中的偏倚定义。
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2249:35-52. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_3.
4
Bounding formulas for selection bias.选择偏倚的界值公式。
Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Nov 15;182(10):868-72. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv130. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
5
Distinguishing Selection Bias and Confounding Bias in Comparative Effectiveness Research.比较效果研究中选择偏倚与混杂偏倚的辨别
Med Care. 2016 Apr;54(4):e23-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000011.
6
[On 'Negative control methods': related principles, methods and applications].[关于“阴性对照方法”：相关原理、方法及应用]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 10;41(4):594-598. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20191109-00796.
7
Randomized trials analyzed as observational studies.作为观察性研究进行分析的随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Oct 15;159(8):560-2. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-8-201310150-00709.
8
When and how to use instrumental variables in palliative care research.何时以及如何在姑息治疗研究中使用工具变量。
J Palliat Med. 2009 May;12(5):471-4. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.9631.
9
Bias in Clinical Research.临床研究中的偏倚。
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2249:17-34. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_2.
10
Multiple-bias Sensitivity Analysis Using Bounds.基于界的多重偏差敏感性分析。
Epidemiology. 2021 Sep 1;32(5):625-634. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001380.
引用本文的文献
1
Extended versus Standard Proning Duration for COVID-19-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Target Trial Emulation Study.COVID-19 相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者行俯卧位通气时长的延长与标准时长比较：一项目标模拟试验研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Oct;21(10):1449-1457. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202404-380OC.
2
Dissecting Through the Literature: A Review of the Critical Appraisal Process.剖析文献：批判性评估过程综述
Cureus. 2024 May 4;16(5):e59658. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59658. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Two Weeks Versus One Week of Maximal Patient-Intensivist Continuity for Adult Medical Intensive Care Patients: A Two-Center Target Trial Emulation.两周与一周最大程度的患者-重症监护医生连续性对成年重症监护患者的影响：一项两中心目标试验模拟研究。
Crit Care Med. 2024 Sep 1;52(9):1323-1332. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006322. Epub 2024 May 7.
4
Self-Reported Everyday Functioning After COVID-19 Infection.新冠感染后的日常功能自我报告。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e240869. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0869.
5
Racial Differences in 1-Year Mortality after Hospitalization for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the United States.美国慢性阻塞性肺疾病住院患者 1 年死亡率的种族差异。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Apr;21(4):585-594. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202304-359OC.
6
Accounting for Competing Events When Evaluating Long-Term Outcomes in Survivors of Critical Illness.在评估危重症幸存者的长期结局时，考虑竞争事件。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Dec 1;208(11):1158-1165. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202305-0790CP.
7
Obstructive sleep apnea in asthmatic children: a cross-sectional study about prevalence and risk factors.哮喘儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停：一项关于患病率和危险因素的横断面研究。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2023 Sep-Oct;99(5):443-448. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2023.03.005. Epub 2023 May 3.
8
Impact of changing case definitions for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hospitalization on pandemic metrics.改变 2019 冠状病毒病（COVID-19）住院病例定义对大流行指标的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Sep;44(9):1458-1466. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.300. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
9
Association of Unit Census with Delays in Antimicrobial Initiation among Ward Patients with Hospital-acquired Sepsis.单位患者统计与住院获得性败血症病房患者抗菌药物起始延迟的关联。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Sep;19(9):1525-1533. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202112-1360OC.
本文引用的文献
1
Attention to Immortal Time Bias in Critical Care Research.重视重症监护研究中的 Immortal Time Bias。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 May 15;203(10):1222-1229. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202008-3238CP.
2
Informing Healthcare Decisions with Observational Research Assessing Causal Effect. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.运用观察性研究评估因果效应来为医疗保健决策提供信息。美国胸科学会官方研究声明。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Jan 1;203(1):14-23. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202010-3943ST.
3
Timing Is Everything. The Importance of Alignment of Time Anchors for Observational Causal Inference Research.时机至关重要。时间锚点对齐在观察性因果推断研究中的重要性。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 May;18(5):769-772. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202009-1163VP.
4
Collider bias undermines our understanding of COVID-19 disease risk and severity.撞击器偏差破坏了我们对 COVID-19 疾病风险和严重程度的理解。
Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 12;11(1):5749. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19478-2.
5
Observational Research for Therapies Titrated to Effect and Associated With Severity of Illness: Misleading Results From Commonly Used Statistical Methods.针对疗效进行滴定治疗的观察性研究及与疾病严重程度相关：常用统计方法得出的误导性结果。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec;48(12):1720-1728. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004612.
6
Inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation for evaluating selection bias in the estimation of childhood obesity prevalence using data from electronic health records.使用电子健康记录数据评估儿童肥胖患病率估计中的选择偏倚的逆概率加权和多重插补。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jan 20;20(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1020-8.
7
Emulating a Novel Clinical Trial Using Existing Observational Data. Predicting Results of the PreVent Study.使用现有观察性数据模拟一项新的临床试验。预测 PreVent 研究的结果。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Aug;16(8):998-1007. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201903-241OC.
8
Control of Confounding and Reporting of Results in Causal Inference Studies. Guidance for Authors from Editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care Journals.因果推断研究中的混杂因素控制与结果报告。呼吸、睡眠和重症监护期刊编辑给作者的指南。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Jan;16(1):22-28. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201808-564PS.
9
How to investigate and adjust for selection bias in cohort studies.如何在队列研究中调查和调整选择偏倚。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Apr;97(4):407-416. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13319. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
10
Invited Commentary: Selection Bias Without Colliders.特邀评论：无对撞机情况下的选择偏倚
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 1;185(11):1048-1050. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx077.
Zotero 插件