Suppr超能文献

价值观的时变观念及其重要性。

Perceptions of values over time and why they matter.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.

出版信息

J Pers. 2021 Aug;89(4):689-705. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12608. Epub 2020 Dec 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Extant research mostly treats values as being stable over time. Our research examined how people perceive values over time and whether or not these perceptions reflect motivational tensions between theoretically opposing values. We also assessed the viability of examining values over time to predict well-being and future intentions.

METHOD

Four studies (N = 934) asked participants to report their values across past, present, and future settings. These temporal trajectories were analyzed across the four types of higher-order values: self-transcendence, self-enhancement, openness, and conservation. Studies 3 and 4 assessed associations with well-being. Study 4 assessed associations with self-reported behavior over time.

RESULTS

Across all four studies, participants perceived their values as being dynamic over time. Younger participants' trajectories did not reflect the motivational conflicts typically reported in values research, but Study 4 showed potential awareness in older age groups. Variability in temporal values correlated with well-being, particularly for openness values. Future values predicted future intentions, even when controlling for present values.

CONCLUSION

This novel method of examining values provides new understanding into how people perceive the pursuit of values over time. Additionally, we show two ways that a temporal values measure can offer new insights into well-being and future intentions.

摘要

目的

现有研究大多认为价值观在时间上是稳定的。我们的研究考察了人们如何随着时间的推移感知价值观,以及这些感知是否反映了理论上相互对立的价值观之间的动机紧张关系。我们还评估了通过考察随时间变化的价值观来预测幸福感和未来意图的可行性。

方法

四项研究(N=934)要求参与者在过去、现在和未来的情境中报告他们的价值观。这四个高级价值观类型(自我超越、自我增强、开放性和保守性)的时间轨迹在四项研究中进行了分析。研究 3 和 4 评估了与幸福感的关联。研究 4 评估了与随时间变化的自我报告行为的关联。

结果

在所有四项研究中,参与者认为他们的价值观随着时间的推移是动态的。年轻参与者的轨迹并没有反映出价值观研究中通常报告的动机冲突,但研究 4 显示出在老年群体中存在潜在的意识。时间价值观的可变性与幸福感相关,特别是对于开放性价值观。未来价值观可以预测未来的意图,即使在控制了当前价值观的情况下也是如此。

结论

这种研究价值观的新方法为人们如何随着时间的推移感知价值观的追求提供了新的理解。此外,我们展示了时间价值观衡量标准可以为幸福感和未来意图提供新见解的两种方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fcd/8518993/d70bb0714385/JOPY-89-689-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceptions of values over time and why they matter.价值观的时变观念及其重要性。
J Pers. 2021 Aug;89(4):689-705. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12608. Epub 2020 Dec 5.

本文引用的文献

2
Neural evidence of motivational conflict between social values.社会价值观之间的动机冲突的神经证据。
Soc Neurosci. 2017 Oct;12(5):494-505. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1183517. Epub 2016 May 19.
7
Potential-based achievement goals.基于潜力的成就目标。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2015 Jun;85(2):192-206. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12051. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
9
The end of history illusion.历史终结论的幻象。
Science. 2013 Jan 4;339(6115):96-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1229294.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验