• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

每周在家监测青光眼患者视野的摄取、持续时间和性能。

Uptake, Persistence, and Performance of Weekly Home Monitoring of Visual Field in a Large Cohort of Patients With Glaucoma.

机构信息

Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia.

Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar;223:286-295. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.10.023. Epub 2020 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2020.10.023
PMID:33221287
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study examines the short-term uptake, compliance, and performance of a tablet device used for home monitoring of visual field (VF-Home) by glaucoma patients.

DESIGN

Single-center, observational, longitudinal, compliance study.

METHODS

Participants who were glaucoma suspects or had stable glaucoma in at least one eye were recruited during a regular clinic review. Baseline in-clinic visual field (VF) was recorded with the Humphrey Field Analyser (HFA, SITA standard) and repeated at 6 months. Participants were tasked with performing 6 VF examinations from home, at weekly intervals, using a loaned iPad tablet. Uptake was defined as returning at least 1 test from home. Reliability and global indices from VF-Home were compared to in-clinic outcomes. Data are shown as either mean ± [standard deviation] or median [quartile 1-3 range], and group comparisons were achieved with bootstrap.

RESULTS

We recruited 186 eyes of 101 participants. VF-Home uptake was excellent, with 88% of participants successfully completing ≥1 home examination and 69% completing all 6 examinations. The median duration between tests was 7.0 [7.0-8.0] days. Barriers to uptake and compliance involved information technology (IT) logistical reasons, lack of motivation, or competing life demands. VF-Home gave greater fixation loss but a similar level of False Positives (FP) as the HFA. A high correlation was found for the mean defect between in-clinic and at-home outcomes (R = 0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

VF-Home can return a high level of short-term compliance and results comparable to those found by in-clinic testing. IT logistical reasons and lack of motivation are barriers to uptake and compliance.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在考察青光眼患者使用平板电脑进行家庭视野(VF-Home)监测的短期接受度、依从性和表现。

设计

单中心、观察性、纵向、依从性研究。

方法

在常规诊所复查期间,招募疑似青光眼或至少一只眼有稳定青光眼的参与者。使用 Humphrey 视野分析仪(HFA,SITA 标准)记录基线门诊视野(VF),并在 6 个月时重复记录。参与者被要求使用借来的 iPad 平板电脑每周在家进行 6 次视野检查。将接受度定义为至少从家中返回 1 次测试。比较了 VF-Home 的可靠性和全局指数与门诊结果。数据以平均值±[标准差]或中位数[四分位数 1-3 范围]表示,组间比较采用自举法。

结果

我们招募了 101 名参与者的 186 只眼。VF-Home 的接受度非常好,88%的参与者成功完成了至少 1 次家庭检查,69%的参与者完成了所有 6 次检查。两次测试之间的中位数时间为 7.0[7.0-8.0]天。接受度和依从性的障碍涉及信息技术(IT)后勤原因、缺乏动力或竞争的生活需求。VF-Home 导致了更多的固视丢失,但假阳性(FP)水平与 HFA 相似。在门诊和家庭结果之间发现了平均缺陷的高度相关性(R=0.85)。

结论

VF-Home 可以实现高水平的短期依从性,并产生与门诊测试相当的结果。IT 后勤原因和缺乏动力是接受度和依从性的障碍。

相似文献

1
Uptake, Persistence, and Performance of Weekly Home Monitoring of Visual Field in a Large Cohort of Patients With Glaucoma.每周在家监测青光眼患者视野的摄取、持续时间和性能。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar;223:286-295. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.10.023. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
2
The Effect of Transitioning from SITA Standard to SITA Faster on Visual Field Performance.从 SITA 标准到 SITA Fast 转换对视场性能的影响。
Ophthalmology. 2021 Oct;128(10):1417-1425. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.03.032. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
3
Test Reliability and Compliance to a Twelve-Month Visual Field Telemedicine Study in Glaucoma Patients.青光眼患者十二个月视野远程医疗研究的测试可靠性与依从性
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 25;11(15):4317. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154317.
4
Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from a Tablet Perimeter, Smart Visual Function Analyzer, and Humphrey Field Analyzer.平板电脑视野计、智能视觉功能分析仪和 Humphrey 视野分析仪的视野计结果比较。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2023 Sep-Oct;6(5):509-520. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2023.03.001. Epub 2023 Mar 12.
5
Can Home Monitoring Allow Earlier Detection of Rapid Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma?家庭监测能否更早发现青光眼的快速视野进展?
Ophthalmology. 2017 Dec;124(12):1735-1742. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.06.028. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
6
A Comparison of the Visual Field Parameters of SITA Faster and SITA Standard Strategies in Glaucoma.青光眼患者中 SITA Fast 与 SITA Standard 策略的视野参数比较。
J Glaucoma. 2020 Sep;29(9):783-788. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001551.
7
Role of visual field reliability indices in ruling out glaucoma.视野可靠性指数在青光眼排除中的作用。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan;133(1):40-4. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.3609.
8
Six-month Longitudinal Comparison of a Portable Tablet Perimeter With the Humphrey Field Analyzer.便携式平板电脑与 Humphrey 视野分析仪的 6 个月纵向比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun;190:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
9
Measuring Visual Fields in Children With Glaucoma Using a Portable Tablet.使用便携式平板电脑测量青光眼儿童的视野。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 May 1;13(5):10. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.5.10.
10
Reversal of Glaucoma Hemifield Test Results and Visual Field Features in Glaucoma.青光眼视野测试结果逆转与视野特征
Ophthalmology. 2018 Mar;125(3):352-360. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.09.021. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Eyecatcher 3.0 - Validating the Use of "Smart Glasses" as a Low-Cost, Portable Method of Assessing Visual Fields.眼球捕捉器3.0——验证将“智能眼镜”作为一种低成本、便携式视野评估方法的应用
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025 Aug 1;14(8):7. doi: 10.1167/tvst.14.8.7.
2
Comparative Analysis of Melbourne Rapid Fields Web-Browser Perimeter and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Chinese Glaucoma Patients.墨尔本快速视野网络浏览器周边视野计与汉弗莱视野分析仪在中国青光眼患者中的对比分析
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025 Jul 1;14(7):18. doi: 10.1167/tvst.14.7.18.
3
Climate-Conscious Glaucoma Care: Strategies to Minimize the Environmental Impact in the Operating Room and in the Clinic.
关注气候的青光眼护理:在手术室和诊所中将环境影响降至最低的策略。
J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 10;2025:7188835. doi: 10.1155/joph/7188835. eCollection 2025.
4
Peripherex Home Visual Field Demonstrates High Test-Retest Reliability, Validity.Peripherex家庭视野检查显示出高重测信度和效度。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 17;19:1877-1884. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S523260. eCollection 2025.
5
Telemonitoring Tools for Glaucoma Patients: A Systematic Review of Current Trends and Applications.青光眼患者的远程监测工具:当前趋势与应用的系统评价
J Clin Med. 2025 May 9;14(10):3317. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103317.
6
Evaluating the Consistency of Online Circular Contrast Perimetry Across Different Computer Monitors: A Cross-sectional Study.评估不同计算机显示器上在线环形对比视野检查的一致性:一项横断面研究。
J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2025 Jan-Mar;19(1):15-27. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1468. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
7
Glaucoma Home Monitoring Using Online Circular Contrast Perimetry Over 6 Months: Performance and Patient Attitudes in the Developing World Setting.使用在线环形对比视野计进行6个月的青光眼家庭监测:发展中国家环境下的性能和患者态度
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr 12;19:1263-1276. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S519093. eCollection 2025.
8
Multi-centre comparison between device-independent web-browser perimetry (Melbourne Rapid Fields-web) and SITA-Faster for glaucoma.用于青光眼的独立设备网络浏览器视野检查法(墨尔本快速视野-网络版)与SITA-Faster的多中心比较
Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 6;5:1485950. doi: 10.3389/fopht.2025.1485950. eCollection 2025.
9
Virtual Reality Portable Perimetry and Home Monitoring of Glaucoma: Retention and Compliance over a 2-year Period.青光眼的虚拟现实便携式视野检查与家庭监测:两年期间的留存率与依从性
Ophthalmol Sci. 2024 Oct 29;5(2):100639. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100639. eCollection 2025 Mar-Apr.
10
'Assessing patients' perception of the potential utility of visual function home monitoring app among patients with diabetes in Saudi Arabia'.评估沙特阿拉伯糖尿病患者对视觉功能家庭监测应用程序潜在效用的认知
Digit Health. 2024 Nov 8;10:20552076241290405. doi: 10.1177/20552076241290405. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.