Suppr超能文献

青光眼患者十二个月视野远程医疗研究的测试可靠性与依从性

Test Reliability and Compliance to a Twelve-Month Visual Field Telemedicine Study in Glaucoma Patients.

作者信息

Prea Selwyn Marc, Vingrys Algis Jonas, Kong George Yu Xiang

机构信息

Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.

Glaucoma Investigation and Research Unit, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 25;11(15):4317. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154317.

Abstract

Background: Our primary aim is to quantify test reliability and compliance of glaucoma patients to a weekly visual field telemedicine (VFTM) schedule. A secondary aim is to determine concordance of the VFTM results to in-clinic outcomes. Methods: Participants with stable glaucoma in one eye were recruited for a 12 month VFTM trial using the Melbourne Rapid Fields (MRF-home, MRFh) iPad application. Participants attended routine 6 month clinical reviews and were tasked with weekly home monitoring with the MRFh over this period. We determined compliance to weekly VFTM (7 + 1 days) and test reliability (false positives (FPs) and fixation loss (FL) <33%). A secondary aim considered concordance to in-clinic measures of visual field (MRF-clinic (MRFc) and the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA)) in active participants (≥10 home examinations and 5 reliable HFA examinations). The linear trend in the MRFh mean deviation (MD) was compared to the HFA guided progression analysis (GPA) using Bland−Altman methods. Data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation. Results: Forty-seven participants with a mean age of 64 ± 14.6 years were recruited for the trial. The VFTM uptake was 85% and compliance to weekly home monitoring was 75% in the presence of weekly text reminders in the analysed group (n = 20). The analysed group was composed of test subjects with five reliable in-clinic HFA examinations (GPA analysis available) and who submitted a minimum of 10 MRFh examinations from home. Of the 757 home examinations returned, approximately two-thirds were reliable, which was significantly lower than the test reliability of the HFA in-clinic (MRFh: 65% vs. HFA: 85%, p < 0.001). The HFA-GPA analysis gave little bias from the MRFh slope (bias: 0.05 dB/yr, p > 0.05). Two eyes were found to have clinical progression during the 12 month period, and both were detected by VFTM. Conclusions: VFTM over 12 months returned good compliance (75%) to weekly testing with good concordance to in-clinic assays. VFTM is a viable option for monitoring patients with glaucoma for visual field progression in between clinical visits.

摘要

背景

我们的主要目标是量化青光眼患者对每周一次视野远程医疗(VFTM)计划的检测可靠性和依从性。次要目标是确定VFTM结果与门诊检查结果的一致性。方法:招募一只眼睛青光眼病情稳定的参与者,使用墨尔本快速视野(MRF-home,MRFh)iPad应用程序进行为期12个月的VFTM试验。参与者参加常规的6个月临床检查,并在此期间负责每周在家使用MRFh进行监测。我们确定了对每周VFTM(7±1天)的依从性和检测可靠性(假阳性(FP)和固视丢失(FL)<33%)。次要目标是考虑在活跃参与者(≥10次家庭检查和5次可靠的HFA检查)中与门诊视野测量(MRF-门诊(MRFc)和汉弗莱视野分析仪(HFA))的一致性。使用布兰德-奥特曼方法将MRFh平均偏差(MD)的线性趋势与HFA引导的进展分析(GPA)进行比较。数据以平均值±标准差表示。结果:招募了47名平均年龄为64±14.6岁的参与者进行试验。在分析组(n = 20)中,有每周短信提醒的情况下,VFTM的使用率为85%,对每周家庭监测的依从性为75%。分析组由具有五次可靠门诊HFA检查(可进行GPA分析)且至少从家中提交10次MRFh检查的测试对象组成。在返回的757次家庭检查中,约三分之二是可靠的,这显著低于门诊HFA的检测可靠性(MRFh:65%对HFA:85%,p < 0.001)。HFA-GPA分析与MRFh斜率的偏差很小(偏差:0.05 dB/年,p > 0.05)。在12个月期间发现两只眼睛有临床进展,且均通过VFTM检测到。结论:12个月的VFTM对每周检测的依从性良好(75%),与门诊检测结果一致性良好。VFTM是在临床就诊期间监测青光眼患者视野进展的可行选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2bd/9332101/0547aaefa505/jcm-11-04317-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验