Kang Sang Hyeon, Lee Juhyeong, Jin Sangeun
The Human and Safety Engineering Laboratory Department of Industrial Engineering Pusan National University Busan, 46241, Republic of Korea.
Appl Ergon. 2021 Apr;92:103306. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103306. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
It is clear that the cognitive resources invested in standing are greater than in sitting, but six of eight previous studies suggested that there is no difference in cognitive performance. This study investigated the effects of sitting and standing workstations on the physical workload and cognitive performance under variable cognitive demand conditions. Fifteen participants visited two times for testing sitting and standing workstations, and were asked to play two difficulty levels of Tetris game for 40 min while kinematic variables, CoP regularity, CoP SD, and cognitive performances were captured every 5 min. Results revealed a more neural posture in standing than in sitting, but using the standing workstation degraded attention and executive function. The CoP SD was 7 times greater in standing, but the CoP regularity was 1/4 in sitting, denoting greater attentional investment while engaged at the standing workstation.
显然,站立时投入的认知资源比坐着时更多,但之前八项研究中的六项表明,认知表现并无差异。本研究调查了在可变认知需求条件下,坐式和立式工作站对身体负荷及认知表现的影响。15名参与者分两次前来测试坐式和立式工作站,并要求他们玩40分钟两个难度级别的俄罗斯方块游戏,同时每隔5分钟记录运动学变量、压力中心(CoP)规律性、CoP标准差及认知表现。结果显示,站立时的姿势比坐着时更费力,但使用立式工作站会降低注意力和执行功能。站立时CoP标准差是坐着时的7倍,但站立时CoP规律性是坐着时的1/4,这表明在使用立式工作站时需要投入更多注意力。