Williams Owain David
School of Political and International Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Development (Rome). 2020;63(2-4):181-190. doi: 10.1057/s41301-020-00273-x. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
The COVID-19 pandemic has produced mass market failure in global private health, particularly in tertiary care. Low-and-middle income countries (LMICs) dependent on private providers as a consequence of neglect of national health systems or imposed conditionalities under neoliberal governance were particularly effected. When beds were most needed for the treatment of acute COVID-19 cases, private providers suffered a liquidity crisis, itself propelled by the primary effects of lockdowns, government regulations and patient deferrals, and the secondary economic impacts of the pandemic. This led to a private sector response-involving, variously, hospital closures, furloughing of staff, refusals of treatment, and attempts to profit by gouging patients. A crisis in state and government relations has multiplied across LMICs. Amid widespread national governance failures-either crisis bound or historic-with regards to poorly resourced public health services and burgeoning private health-governments have responded with increasing legal and financial interventions into national health markets. In contrast, multilateral governance has been path dependent with regard to ongoing commitments to privately provided health. Indeed, the global financial institutions appear to be using the COVID crisis as a means to recommit to the roll out of markets in global health, this involving the further scaling back of the state.
新冠疫情导致全球私人医疗领域出现大规模市场失灵,尤其是在三级医疗方面。由于国家卫生系统被忽视或在新自由主义治理下受到强加的条件限制,依赖私人医疗服务提供者的中低收入国家受到的影响尤为严重。在最需要床位来治疗急性新冠病例时,私人医疗服务提供者遭遇了流动性危机,这一危机本身是由封锁、政府规定和患者延期治疗的直接影响以及疫情的间接经济影响所推动的。这导致了私营部门的一系列反应,包括不同程度的医院关闭、员工休假、拒绝治疗以及试图通过宰割患者来获利。中低收入国家的国家与政府关系危机成倍增加。在资源匮乏的公共卫生服务和蓬勃发展的私人医疗领域普遍存在国家治理失灵的情况下——无论是因危机导致还是历史遗留问题——政府对国家医疗市场的法律和财政干预日益增加。相比之下,多边治理在对私人提供医疗服务的持续承诺方面具有路径依赖性。事实上,全球金融机构似乎在利用新冠危机作为重新致力于在全球医疗领域推行市场的手段,这包括进一步缩减国家的作用。