• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

付费社交问答在与新冠疫情共存阶段对恐慌性购买和数字囤积行为的影响:支付痛感敏感度的调节作用

The impact of paid social Q&A on panic buying and digital hoarding at the stage of coexistence with COVID-19: The moderating role of sensitivity to pain of payment.

作者信息

Wang Yajuan, Ding Austin Shijun, Xu Chonghuan

机构信息

School of Business Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China.

Modern Business Research Center, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2023 Jan;84:103472. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103472. Epub 2022 Nov 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103472
PMID:36465701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9708103/
Abstract

The worldwide disaster caused by COVID-19 and its variants has changed the behavior and psychology of consumers. Panic buying and hoarding of various commodities continue to emerge in our daily life. Meanwhile, many scholars have focused on the causes of panic buying and hoarding of physical products like daily necessities and food during the outbreak of COVID-19. In fact, the phenomenon of panic buying and digital hoarding of paid social Q&A and other digital content products is very prominent, both in the outbreak period of COVID-19 epidemic and the current coexistence stage. However, the existing literature lacks empirical research to explore this phenomenon, and the psychological mechanism behind it has not been clearly revealed. Therefore, at the current stage of coexistence with COVID-19, based on the SOBC framework, we developed a theoretical model and explored the causes of panic buying and digital hoarding in paid social Q&A. The data collected from 863 paid social Q&A users in China are empirically tested. The results show that the characteristics of paid social Q&A (usefulness, ease of use, professionalism and value) can cause emotional contagion among platform users, activate their willingness to pay, and finally lead to digital hoarding and panic buying behavior of COVID-19 co-existence stage. In addition, the sensitivity to pain of payment moderates the relationship between emotional contagion and willingness to pay. Compared with the spendthrifts, the tightwads are more willing to pay. The conclusions will have positive significance for improving the retail service of digital content platform and promoting the consumption of digital content.

摘要

由新冠病毒及其变种引发的全球灾难改变了消费者的行为和心理。在我们的日常生活中,各种商品的恐慌性购买和囤积现象不断出现。与此同时,许多学者关注了新冠疫情爆发期间诸如日用品和食品等实物产品的恐慌性购买和囤积的原因。事实上,无论是在新冠疫情爆发期还是当前的共存阶段,付费社交问答等数字内容产品的恐慌性购买和数字囤积现象都非常突出。然而,现有文献缺乏实证研究来探究这一现象,其背后的心理机制也尚未得到清晰揭示。因此,在与新冠病毒共存的现阶段,基于SOBC框架,我们构建了一个理论模型,并探究了付费社交问答中恐慌性购买和数字囤积的原因。对从中国863名付费社交问答用户收集的数据进行了实证检验。结果表明,付费社交问答的特征(有用性、易用性、专业性和价值)会导致平台用户之间的情绪传染,激活他们的支付意愿,并最终导致新冠共存阶段的数字囤积和恐慌性购买行为。此外,支付痛感敏感度调节了情绪传染与支付意愿之间的关系。与大手大脚花钱的人相比,吝啬的人更愿意支付。这些结论对于改善数字内容平台的零售服务以及促进数字内容消费具有积极意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3125/9708103/377fe9858834/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3125/9708103/de9efdf03e6c/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3125/9708103/8cab0b84994e/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3125/9708103/377fe9858834/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3125/9708103/de9efdf03e6c/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3125/9708103/8cab0b84994e/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3125/9708103/377fe9858834/gr3_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of paid social Q&A on panic buying and digital hoarding at the stage of coexistence with COVID-19: The moderating role of sensitivity to pain of payment.付费社交问答在与新冠疫情共存阶段对恐慌性购买和数字囤积行为的影响:支付痛感敏感度的调节作用
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2023 Jan;84:103472. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103472. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
2
Anxiety and Panic Buying Behaviour during COVID-19 Pandemic-A Qualitative Analysis of Toilet Paper Hoarding Contents on Twitter.新冠疫情期间的焦虑和恐慌性购买行为——对 Twitter 上卫生纸囤积内容的定性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 27;18(3):1127. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031127.
3
A Biopsychosocial Approach to Understanding Panic Buying: Integrating Neurobiological, Attachment-Based, and Social-Anthropological Perspectives.一种理解恐慌性购买行为的生物心理社会方法:整合神经生物学、基于依恋和社会人类学视角
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 24;12:652353. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.652353. eCollection 2021.
4
Why did all the toilet paper disappear? Distinguishing between panic buying and hoarding during COVID-19.为什么所有的卫生纸都不见了?在 COVID-19 期间区分恐慌性购买和囤积。
Psychiatry Res. 2021 Sep;303:114062. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114062. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
5
Chinese public's panic buying at the beginning of COVID-19 outbreak: The contribution of perceived risk, social media use, and connection with close others.新冠疫情爆发初期中国公众的恐慌性购买行为:感知风险、社交媒体使用以及与亲密他人的联系所起的作用
Curr Psychol. 2022;41(11):8157-8166. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02072-0. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
6
Is it really "panic buying"? Public perceptions and experiences of extra buying at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.这真的是“恐慌性购买”吗?公众对 COVID-19 大流行初期额外购买的看法和体验。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 25;17(2):e0264618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264618. eCollection 2022.
7
Promoting social distancing and preventing panic buying during the epidemic of COVID-19: the contributions of people's psychological and behavioural factors.在新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间促进社交距离并防止恐慌性抢购:人们心理和行为因素的作用
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2023;31(2):187-201. doi: 10.1007/s10389-021-01497-y. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
8
Should I buy or not? Revisiting the concept and measurement of panic buying.我应该购买还是不购买?重新审视抢购的概念与衡量方法。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Apr 13:1-21. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03089-9.
9
Understanding the importance and timing of panic buying among U.S. Households during the COVID-19 pandemic.了解美国民众在新冠疫情期间恐慌性购买行为的重要性及时机。
Food Qual Prefer. 2021 Oct;93:104240. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104240. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
10
Panic buying research: A bibliometric review.恐慌性购买研究:文献计量学综述
Nepal J Epidemiol. 2022 Sep 30;12(3):1224-1230. doi: 10.3126/nje.v12i3.43436. eCollection 2022 Sep.

引用本文的文献

1
A Multi-Information Spreading Model for One-Time Retweet Information in Complex Networks.复杂网络中一次性转发信息的多信息传播模型
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Feb 9;26(2):152. doi: 10.3390/e26020152.
2
Is Conspicuous Consumption Influenced by Cyber-Ostracism? A Moderated Mediation Model.炫耀性消费是否受网络排斥影响?一个有调节的中介模型。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Dec 22;13(1):6. doi: 10.3390/bs13010006.

本文引用的文献

1
The bright and dark sides of social media usage during the COVID-19 pandemic: Survey evidence from Japan.新冠疫情期间社交媒体使用的利弊:来自日本的调查证据
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021 Feb 15;54:102034. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.102034. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
2
Panic buying during COVID-19: Survival psychology and needs perspectives in deprived environments.新冠疫情期间的抢购行为:贫困环境中的生存心理与需求视角
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021 Aug;62:102421. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102421. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
3
Perception risk, preventive behaviors and assessing the relationship between their various dimensions: A cross-sectional study in the Covid-19 peak period.
感知风险、预防行为及其各维度之间的关系评估:新冠疫情高峰期的一项横断面研究
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022 Jul;77:103093. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103093. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
4
Dynamics and asymmetries between consumer sentiment and consumption in pre- and during-COVID-19 time: Evidence from the US.新冠疫情前及疫情期间消费者情绪与消费之间的动态关系及不对称性:来自美国的证据
J Econ Asymmetries. 2021 Nov;24:e00227. doi: 10.1016/j.jeca.2021.e00227. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
5
Income gradient of pharmaceutical panic buying at the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.COVID-19 疫情爆发期间药品恐慌性购买的收入梯度。
Health Econ. 2021 Sep;30(9):2312-2320. doi: 10.1002/hec.4378. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
6
Preparing for a pandemic: spending dynamics and panic buying during the COVID-19 first wave.为大流行做准备:新冠疫情第一波期间的支出动态与恐慌性购买
Fisc Stud. 2021 Jun;42(2):249-264. doi: 10.1111/1475-5890.12271. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
7
Why did all the toilet paper disappear? Distinguishing between panic buying and hoarding during COVID-19.为什么所有的卫生纸都不见了?在 COVID-19 期间区分恐慌性购买和囤积。
Psychiatry Res. 2021 Sep;303:114062. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114062. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
8
The Determinants of Panic Buying during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间抢购行为的决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 21;18(6):3247. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063247.
9
Pandemic buying: Testing a psychological model of over-purchasing and panic buying using data from the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.大流行期间抢购:利用英国和爱尔兰在 COVID-19 大流行早期阶段的数据,测试过度购买和恐慌购买的心理模型。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 27;16(1):e0246339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246339. eCollection 2021.
10
Is Fear of COVID-19 Contagious? The Effects of Emotion Contagion and Social Media Use on Anxiety in Response to the Coronavirus Pandemic.对新冠病毒传播的恐惧具有传染性吗?情绪传染和社交媒体使用对冠状病毒大流行引发的焦虑的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 5;11:567379. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.567379. eCollection 2020.