• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情期间抢购行为的决定因素。

The Determinants of Panic Buying during COVID-19.

机构信息

School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore.

Department of International Logistics, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 21;18(6):3247. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063247.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18063247
PMID:33801077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8003931/
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has seen an unmatched level of panic buying globally, a type of herd behavior whereby consumers buy an uncommonly huge amount of products because of a perception of scarcity. Drawing on the health belief model, perceived scarcity, and anticipated regret theories, this paper formulated a theoretical model that linked the determinants of panic buying and analyzed their interrelationships. Subsequently, data were collated from 508 consumers through an online survey questionnaire in Singapore that was conducted during the early stage of the pandemic, before the onset of the circuit breaker in April 2020. Next, an analysis of the results was done through structural equation modeling. It showed that the effect of the health belief model dimensions (i.e., perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, outcome expectation, cues to action, and self-efficacy) on panic buying is partially mediated by the consumers' perceived scarcity of products. Furthermore, the effect of perceived scarcity on panic buying is partially mediated by consumers' anticipation of regret. This paper expands on the current theoretical understanding of panic buying behavior, giving insights into the possible measures and solutions that policymakers and relevant stakeholders can uptake to manage panic buying in future a pandemic or health crisis.

摘要

COVID-19 大流行在全球范围内引发了前所未有的恐慌性抢购潮,这是一种羊群行为,消费者因为感觉到供应短缺而大量购买不常见的产品。本文以健康信念模型、感知稀缺性和预期遗憾理论为基础,构建了一个理论模型,将恐慌性购买的决定因素联系起来,并分析了它们之间的相互关系。随后,通过在新加坡进行的一项在线调查,从 508 名消费者那里收集了数据,该调查是在 2020 年 4 月断路器启动之前的大流行早期进行的。接下来,通过结构方程模型进行了结果分析。结果表明,健康信念模型维度(即感知易感性、感知严重性、结果预期、行动线索和自我效能)对恐慌性购买的影响部分通过消费者对产品稀缺性的感知来中介。此外,感知稀缺性对恐慌性购买的影响部分通过消费者对遗憾的预期来中介。本文扩展了对恐慌性购买行为的现有理论理解,为政策制定者和相关利益相关者提供了未来大流行或健康危机中管理恐慌性购买的可能措施和解决方案的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3487/8003931/fc2f46c063dd/ijerph-18-03247-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3487/8003931/f68aaf274d3e/ijerph-18-03247-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3487/8003931/fc2f46c063dd/ijerph-18-03247-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3487/8003931/f68aaf274d3e/ijerph-18-03247-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3487/8003931/fc2f46c063dd/ijerph-18-03247-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Determinants of Panic Buying during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间抢购行为的决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 21;18(6):3247. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063247.
2
Panic buying during COVID-19: Survival psychology and needs perspectives in deprived environments.新冠疫情期间的抢购行为:贫困环境中的生存心理与需求视角
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021 Aug;62:102421. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102421. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
3
The Psychological Causes of Panic Buying Following a Health Crisis.健康危机后恐慌性购买的心理原因。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 18;17(10):3513. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103513.
4
Why did all the toilet paper disappear? Distinguishing between panic buying and hoarding during COVID-19.为什么所有的卫生纸都不见了?在 COVID-19 期间区分恐慌性购买和囤积。
Psychiatry Res. 2021 Sep;303:114062. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114062. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
5
A Cross-sectional Study of Antecedents and Consequence of Panic Buying Behavior: The Moderating Effect of COVID-19 Rumors.恐慌性购买行为的前因后果的横断面研究:COVID-19 谣言的调节作用。
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221126304. doi: 10.1177/00469580221126304.
6
Should I buy or not? Revisiting the concept and measurement of panic buying.我应该购买还是不购买?重新审视抢购的概念与衡量方法。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Apr 13:1-21. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03089-9.
7
Perceived Impact of Social Media on Panic Buying: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey in Iraqi Kurdistan.社交媒体对恐慌性购买的感知影响:伊拉克库尔德斯坦的在线横断面调查。
Front Public Health. 2021 May 10;9:668153. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.668153. eCollection 2021.
8
Panic Food Purchasing amid COVID-19 Pandemic: Does the Impact of Perceived Severity, Anxiety and Self-Isolation Really Matter?新冠疫情期间的恐慌性食品购买:感知严重性、焦虑和自我隔离的影响真的重要吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 18;19(22):15277. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215277.
9
Responsible Factors of Panic Buying: An Observation From Online Media Reports.抢购的责任因素:来自在线媒体报道的观察。
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 5;8:603894. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.603894. eCollection 2020.
10
Pandemic buying: Testing a psychological model of over-purchasing and panic buying using data from the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.大流行期间抢购:利用英国和爱尔兰在 COVID-19 大流行早期阶段的数据,测试过度购买和恐慌购买的心理模型。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 27;16(1):e0246339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246339. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Customer Retention in the Philippine Food Sector: Health Measures, Market Access, and Strategic Adaptation After the COVID-19 Pandemic.菲律宾食品行业的客户留存:新冠疫情后的健康措施、市场准入与战略调整
Foods. 2025 Jul 19;14(14):2535. doi: 10.3390/foods14142535.
2
Drug stockpiling behavior and its impact on anxiety among the general public in the early stage after the lifting of China's Zero-COVID policy: results from a web-based survey.中国新冠疫情防控政策放开初期公众的囤药行为及其对焦虑情绪的影响:一项基于网络调查的结果
Front Pharmacol. 2025 May 12;16:1524068. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1524068. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Policy capacity and Singapore's response to the COVID-19 pandemic.政策能力与新加坡对新冠疫情的应对
Policy Soc. 2020 Jun 18;39(3):345-362. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2020.1783789. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
The impact of COVID-19 on transport volume and freight capacity dynamics: An empirical analysis in German food retail logistics.新冠疫情对运输量和货运能力动态的影响:德国食品零售物流的实证分析
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Jul;6:100165. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100165. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
3
A path analytic model of health beliefs on the behavioral adoption of breast self-examination.
Review on Panic Buying Behavior during Pandemics: Influencing Factors, Stockpiling, and Intervention Strategies.
疫情期间恐慌性购买行为综述:影响因素、囤货及干预策略
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Mar 9;14(3):222. doi: 10.3390/bs14030222.
4
Anticipated scarcity and stockpiling during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of perceived threat, childhood SES and materialism.新冠疫情期间预期的短缺和囤货现象:感知威胁、儿童时期社会经济地位和物质主义的作用。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 25;19(3):e0294497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294497. eCollection 2024.
5
The demand for online grocery shopping: COVID-induced changes in grocery shopping behavior of Canadian consumers.在线杂货购物的需求:加拿大消费者因 COVID-19 而改变的杂货购物行为。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 8;19(2):e0295538. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295538. eCollection 2024.
6
Are non-competitors greener? The effect of consumer awareness differences on green food consumption.非竞争者更环保吗?消费者认知差异对绿色食品消费的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 4;14:1276261. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1276261. eCollection 2023.
7
Pandemic disruptions in vaccine uptake in a low-income setting: a qualitative inquiry.低收入环境下大流行对疫苗接种的干扰:一项定性调查
BMC Proc. 2023 Nov 9;17(Suppl 7):31. doi: 10.1186/s12919-023-00283-w.
8
Characterization of superspreaders movement in a bidirectional corridor using a social force model.利用社会力模型刻画双向走廊中超级传播者的运动特征。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 28;11:1188732. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1188732. eCollection 2023.
9
Defining collective irrationality of COVID-19: shared mentality, mimicry, affective contagion, and psychosocial adaptivity.定义新冠病毒病的集体非理性:共享心态、模仿、情感传染和社会心理适应性。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 6;14:1192041. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1192041. eCollection 2023.
10
Managing Fear During Pandemics: Risks and Opportunities.应对疫情期间的恐惧:风险与机遇。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Jul;19(4):652-659. doi: 10.1177/17456916231178720. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
关于乳房自我检查行为采用的健康信念路径分析模型。
AIMS Public Health. 2020 Dec 21;8(1):15-31. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021002. eCollection 2021.
4
Panic Buying in Bangladesh: An Exploration of Media Reports.孟加拉国的抢购潮:对媒体报道的探究
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 18;11:628393. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.628393. eCollection 2020.
5
Association of Prediabetes Status Awareness With Behaviors and Perception of Health.糖尿病前期知晓状况与行为及健康感知的关联。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 Jan-Feb;34(1):224-230. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.01.200146.
6
Predictors of adherence with home quarantine during COVID-19 crisis: the case of health belief model.新冠疫情危机期间居家隔离依从性的预测因素:以健康信念模型为例
Psychol Health Med. 2022 Jan;27(1):215-227. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2021.1871770. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
7
Beyond Politics - Promoting Covid-19 Vaccination in the United States.超越政治——在美国推广新冠疫苗接种
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 18;384(7):e23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms2033790. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
8
Impact of Covid-19 on Household Food Waste: The Case of Italy.新冠疫情对家庭食物浪费的影响:以意大利为例。
Front Nutr. 2020 Dec 2;7:585090. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.585090. eCollection 2020.
9
COVID-19 suicidal behavior among couples and suicide pacts: Case study evidence from press reports.新冠疫情期间夫妻间的自杀行为与自杀协议:来自新闻报道的案例研究证据
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jul;289:113105. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113105. Epub 2020 May 16.
10
Responsible Factors of Panic Buying: An Observation From Online Media Reports.抢购的责任因素:来自在线媒体报道的观察。
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 5;8:603894. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.603894. eCollection 2020.