• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交媒体对恐慌性购买的感知影响:伊拉克库尔德斯坦的在线横断面调查。

Perceived Impact of Social Media on Panic Buying: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey in Iraqi Kurdistan.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Enam Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Department of Administration, College of Humanities, University of Raparin, Ranya, Iraq.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2021 May 10;9:668153. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.668153. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2021.668153
PMID:34041218
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8141789/
Abstract

Social media has an impact on panic buying by creating fear, disseminating pictures, and videos of people purchasing extra goods in a state of panic during the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to evaluate the perceived impact of social media on panic buying behaviors in the Iraqi Kurdistan region. This cross-sectional survey was conducted from October 10 to November 25, 2020. A self-reported instrument was designed in English and then translated to the Kurdish Language to conduct the study. It was disseminated through social media platforms (Facebook, Viber, and WhatsApp) and e-mail, a link, and 466 responses were collected from social media users. The statistical computations were performed using SPSS version 21. The majority of respondents were male (62.2%), were <25 years old (43.9%), and had completed their bachelor's degree (53.9%), and most of the respondents (86.3%) used Facebook. Among the respondents, 42.1% were involved in panic buying, 32.8% of the respondents thought that social media platforms had an influence on panic buying, 86.1% of the respondents thought that social media should be sensible while reporting it, 88.4% thought that the reporting should be controlled, and 78.5% thought that photos of empty shelves should be avoided. There was a significant positive statistical correlation ( = 0.84) between social media use and panic buying among consumers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iraqi Kurdistan ( = <0.001). This research assessed how social media affects buying behavior, particularly in Iraq. Collective measures, such as sensible use and adequate media literacy, are needed to prevent such behaviors at least during public health emergencies.

摘要

社交媒体通过制造恐慌、传播 COVID-19 大流行期间人们恐慌性购买额外商品的图片和视频,对抢购行为产生影响。我们旨在评估社交媒体对伊拉克库尔德地区抢购行为的感知影响。这项横断面调查于 2020 年 10 月 10 日至 11 月 25 日进行。设计了一份英文自报告工具,然后翻译成库尔德语进行研究。它通过社交媒体平台(脸书、Viber 和 WhatsApp)和电子邮件进行传播,从社交媒体用户中收集到 466 份回复。使用 SPSS 版本 21 进行统计计算。大多数受访者为男性(62.2%),年龄<25 岁(43.9%),并完成了学士学位(53.9%),大多数受访者(86.3%)使用脸书。在受访者中,42.1%的人参与了抢购,32.8%的受访者认为社交媒体平台对抢购有影响,86.1%的受访者认为社交媒体在报道时应该理智,88.4%的受访者认为应该对报道进行控制,78.5%的受访者认为应该避免拍摄货架空空的照片。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,伊拉克库尔德地区消费者的社交媒体使用与抢购行为之间存在显著正统计学相关性( = 0.84)( = <0.001)。本研究评估了社交媒体如何影响购买行为,特别是在伊拉克。在公共卫生紧急情况下,需要采取集体措施,如理智使用和适当的媒体素养,以防止此类行为发生。

相似文献

1
Perceived Impact of Social Media on Panic Buying: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey in Iraqi Kurdistan.社交媒体对恐慌性购买的感知影响:伊拉克库尔德斯坦的在线横断面调查。
Front Public Health. 2021 May 10;9:668153. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.668153. eCollection 2021.
2
The Impact of Social Media on Panic During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Iraqi Kurdistan: Online Questionnaire Study.社交媒体对伊拉克库尔德斯坦地区新冠疫情期间恐慌情绪的影响:在线问卷调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 19;22(5):e19556. doi: 10.2196/19556.
3
A Cross-sectional Study of Antecedents and Consequence of Panic Buying Behavior: The Moderating Effect of COVID-19 Rumors.恐慌性购买行为的前因后果的横断面研究:COVID-19 谣言的调节作用。
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221126304. doi: 10.1177/00469580221126304.
4
Social media and spreading panic among adults during the COVID-19 pandemic, Egypt.社交媒体与 COVID-19 大流行期间埃及成年人的恐慌情绪传播
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(16):23374-23382. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17580-6. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
5
The Determinants of Panic Buying during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间抢购行为的决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 21;18(6):3247. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063247.
6
Understanding and managing pandemic-related panic buying.理解和管理与大流行相关的恐慌性购买。
J Anxiety Disord. 2021 Mar;78:102364. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102364. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
7
Panic buying: An insight from the content analysis of media reports during COVID-19 pandemic.恐慌性购买:对新冠疫情期间媒体报道的内容分析洞察
Neurol Psychiatry Brain Res. 2020 Sep;37:100-103. doi: 10.1016/j.npbr.2020.07.002. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
8
Responsible Factors of Panic Buying: An Observation From Online Media Reports.抢购的责任因素:来自在线媒体报道的观察。
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 5;8:603894. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.603894. eCollection 2020.
9
Should I buy or not? Revisiting the concept and measurement of panic buying.我应该购买还是不购买?重新审视抢购的概念与衡量方法。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Apr 13:1-21. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03089-9.
10
Why did all the toilet paper disappear? Distinguishing between panic buying and hoarding during COVID-19.为什么所有的卫生纸都不见了?在 COVID-19 期间区分恐慌性购买和囤积。
Psychiatry Res. 2021 Sep;303:114062. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114062. Epub 2021 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of social media in public health crises caused by infectious disease: a scoping review.社交媒体在传染病引发的公共卫生危机中的作用:范围综述。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Dec 28;8(12):e013515. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013515.
2
Fake news on Facebook and their impact on supply chain disruption during COVID-19.脸书上的虚假新闻及其对新冠疫情期间供应链中断的影响。
Ann Oper Res. 2022 Dec 19:1-29. doi: 10.1007/s10479-022-05124-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Panic Buying in Bangladesh: An Exploration of Media Reports.孟加拉国的抢购潮:对媒体报道的探究
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 18;11:628393. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.628393. eCollection 2020.
2
Panic buying in times of coronavirus (COVID-19): Extending the theory of planned behavior to understand the stockpiling of nonperishable food in Germany.新冠病毒(COVID-19)大流行时期的恐慌性购买:扩展计划行为理论以理解德国的不易腐坏食品囤货行为。
Appetite. 2021 Jun 1;161:105118. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105118. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
3
Based on Computational Communication Paradigm: Simulation of Public Opinion Communication Process of Panic Buying During the COVID-19 Pandemic.基于计算传播范式:新冠疫情期间抢购行为的舆情传播过程模拟
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020 Nov 20;13:1027-1045. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S280825. eCollection 2020.
4
Responsible Factors of Panic Buying: An Observation From Online Media Reports.抢购的责任因素:来自在线媒体报道的观察。
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 5;8:603894. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.603894. eCollection 2020.
5
Stockpiling in the time of COVID-19.新冠疫情期间的囤货现象。
Br J Health Psychol. 2021 May;26(2):535-543. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12480. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
6
Panic buying: Is it really a problem?恐慌性抢购:这真的是个问题吗?
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;67(5):520-521. doi: 10.1177/0020764020962539. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
7
Possible Controlling Measures of Panic Buying During COVID-19.新冠疫情期间恐慌性抢购的可能控制措施。
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2021;19(6):2289-2291. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00320-1. Epub 2020 May 21.
8
Panic buying: An insight from the content analysis of media reports during COVID-19 pandemic.恐慌性购买:对新冠疫情期间媒体报道的内容分析洞察
Neurol Psychiatry Brain Res. 2020 Sep;37:100-103. doi: 10.1016/j.npbr.2020.07.002. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
9
The Psychological Causes of Panic Buying Following a Health Crisis.健康危机后恐慌性购买的心理原因。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 18;17(10):3513. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103513.
10
Psychological underpinning of panic buying during pandemic (COVID-19).疫情(新冠肺炎)期间恐慌性购买的心理基础。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jul;289:113061. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113061. Epub 2020 May 6.