Chui Karen, Thakrar Amit, Shankar Shivakumar
Queen's Hospital, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Romford, UK.
Bone Jt Open. 2020 Jun 3;1(6):190-197. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.16.BJO-2020-0035.R1. eCollection 2020 Jun.
Hip fracture patients are at higher risk of severe COVID-19 illness, and admission into hospital puts them at further risk. We implemented a two-site orthopaedic trauma service, with 'COVID' and 'COVID-free' hubs, to deliver urgent and infection-controlled trauma care for hip fracture patients, while increasing bed capacity for medical patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.
A vacated private elective surgical centre was repurposed to facilitate a two-site, 'COVID' and 'COVID-free', hip fracture service. Patients were screened for COVID-19 infection and either kept at our 'COVID' site or transferred to our 'COVID-free' site. We collected data for 30 days on patient demographics, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), Nottingham Hip Fracture Scores (NHFS), time to surgery, COVID-19 status, mortality, and length of stay (LOS).
In all, 47 hip fracture patients presented to our service: 12 were admitted to the 'COVID' site and 35 to the 'COVID-free' site. The 'COVID' site cohort were older (mean 86.8 vs 78.5 years, p = 0.0427) and with poorer CFS (p = 0.0147) and NHFS (p = 0.0023) scores. At the 'COVID-free' site, mean time to surgery was less (29.8 vs 52.8 hours, p = 0.0146), and mean LOS seemed shorter (8.7 vs 12.6 days, p = 0.0592). No patients tested positive for COVID-19 infection while at the 'COVID-free' site. We redirected 74% of our admissions from the base 'COVID' site and created 304 inpatient days' capacity for medical COVID patients.
Acquisition of unused elective orthopaedic capacity from the private sector facilitated a two-site trauma service. Patients were treated expeditiously, while successfully achieving strict infection control. We achieved significant gains in medical bed capacity in response to the COVID-19 demand. The authors propose the repurposing of unused elective operating facilities for a two-site 'COVID' and 'COVID-free' model as a safe and effective way of managing hip fracture patients during the pandemic.Cite this article: 2020;1-6:190-197.
髋部骨折患者患重症 COVID-19 的风险更高,住院会使他们面临更大风险。我们实施了一项两地骨科创伤服务,设有“COVID”和“无 COVID”中心,为髋部骨折患者提供紧急且感染受控的创伤护理,同时在 COVID-19 大流行期间增加内科患者的床位。
将一个腾出的私立择期手术中心重新利用,以促成一个两地的“COVID”和“无 COVID”髋部骨折服务。对患者进行 COVID-19 感染筛查,患者要么留在我们的“COVID”中心,要么转至我们的“无 COVID”中心。我们收集了 30 天内患者的人口统计学数据、临床衰弱量表(CFS)、诺丁汉髋部骨折评分(NHFS)、手术时间、COVID-19 状态、死亡率和住院时间(LOS)。
共有 47 例髋部骨折患者前来接受我们的服务:12 例被收治到“COVID”中心,35 例被收治到“无 COVID”中心。“COVID”中心的患者年龄更大(平均 86.8 岁对 78.5 岁,p = 0.0427),CFS 评分更差(p = 0.0147),NHFS 评分更差(p = 0.0023)。在“无 COVID”中心,平均手术时间更短(29.8 小时对 52.8 小时,p = 0.0146),平均住院时间似乎也更短(8.7 天对 12.6 天,p = 0.0592)。在“无 COVID”中心期间,没有患者 COVID-19 检测呈阳性。我们将 74%的入院患者从基础“COVID”中心转出,为 COVID 内科患者创造了 304 个住院日的床位。
从私营部门获取未使用的择期骨科床位促成了一项两地创伤服务。患者得到了快速治疗,同时成功实现了严格的感染控制。我们根据 COVID-19 的需求在医疗床位方面取得了显著增加。作者提议将未使用的择期手术设施重新用于两地“COVID”和“无 COVID”模式,作为在大流行期间管理髋部骨折患者的一种安全有效的方法。引用本文:2020;1 - 6:190 - 197。