• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孕妇分娩镇痛态度问卷(LPRAQ-p)的编制。

Development of the Labor Pain Relief Attitude Questionnaire for pregnant women (LPRAQ-p).

机构信息

Center of Research in Psychological and Somatic disorders (CoRPS), Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, P.O. BOX 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, the Netherlands.

UvA minds, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):718. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03415-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-020-03415-8
PMID:33228637
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7686754/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Receiving epidural analgesia during labor can possibly have negative consequences for mother and child. Yet, the use of epidural analgesia rapidly increased in the Netherlands over the last decade. Since antenatal plans for labor pain relief have been related to epidural analgesia use during labor, the aim of the current study was to develop a Labor Pain Relief Attitude Questionnaire for pregnant women (LPRAQ-p).

METHODS

Three focus group interviews were conducted with pregnant women, new mothers and caregivers and 13 candidate items were derived. Psychometric properties were tested with explorative factor analysis in sample I (N = 429) and a subsequent confirmatory factor analysis in a different sample II (N = 432).

RESULTS

The explorative factor analysis suggested a two-factor seven-item solution: a 'women's perception' and 'social environment' subscale. The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed an excellent six-item model fit with appropriate internal consistency. Higher scores on the six-item LPRAQ-p indicate greater willingness for request of pain relief medication during labor. Two-tailed t-tests showed that women with elevated levels of depression and pregnancy-specific distress symptoms, nulliparous women and multiparous women with complications during a previous delivery had greater willingness for request of pain relief medication during labor. Linear regression showed that the most important association with higher scores on the LPRAQ-p were high pregnancy-specific distress symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed the LPRAQ-p to be a valid instrument to evaluate attitude towards labor pain relief in pregnant women. High scores on this questionnaire are associated with high levels of pregnancy-specific distress symptoms.

摘要

背景

分娩时接受硬膜外镇痛可能对母婴有负面影响。然而,在过去十年中,荷兰硬膜外镇痛的使用迅速增加。由于分娩时缓解疼痛的产前计划与硬膜外镇痛的使用有关,因此本研究的目的是为孕妇开发一种分娩疼痛缓解态度问卷(LPRAQ-p)。

方法

对孕妇、新妈妈和护理人员进行了三次焦点小组访谈,得出了 13 项候选项目。在样本 I(N=429)中进行了探索性因子分析,在另一个样本 II(N=432)中进行了后续验证性因子分析,以检验心理测量学特性。

结果

探索性因子分析表明,该问卷存在两个七项因子结构:“女性感知”和“社会环境”子量表。验证性因子分析证实了一个具有适当内部一致性的优秀六因子模型拟合。LPRAQ-p 上的得分越高,表明在分娩时更愿意请求使用止痛药物。双尾 t 检验显示,抑郁和妊娠特异性焦虑症状水平较高、初产妇、前次分娩有并发症的经产妇在分娩时更愿意请求使用止痛药物。线性回归显示,与 LPRAQ-p 得分较高相关的最重要因素是妊娠特异性焦虑症状较高。

结论

本研究表明 LPRAQ-p 是评估孕妇分娩疼痛缓解态度的有效工具。该问卷的高分与较高的妊娠特异性焦虑症状水平相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9034/7686754/ce8709313ee2/12884_2020_3415_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9034/7686754/ce8709313ee2/12884_2020_3415_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9034/7686754/ce8709313ee2/12884_2020_3415_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of the Labor Pain Relief Attitude Questionnaire for pregnant women (LPRAQ-p).孕妇分娩镇痛态度问卷(LPRAQ-p)的编制。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):718. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03415-8.
2
Performance of the Angle Labor Pain Questionnaire During Initiation of Epidural Analgesia in Early Active Labor.活跃期早期硬膜外镇痛开始时角度分娩疼痛问卷的性能
Anesth Analg. 2016 Dec;123(6):1546-1553. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001679.
3
The Relationship Between Women's Intention to Request a Labor Epidural Analgesia, Actually Delivering With Labor Epidural Analgesia, and Postpartum Depression at 6 Weeks: A Prospective Observational Study.《前瞻性观察研究:女性要求分娩硬膜外镇痛的意愿、实际使用分娩硬膜外镇痛与产后 6 周抑郁的关系》。
Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1590-1597. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002501.
4
Factors associated with the intention of pregnant women to give birth with epidural analgesia: a cross-sectional study.与孕妇行硬膜外分娩镇痛意愿相关的因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Aug 22;23(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05887-w.
5
Maternal quality of life in routine labor epidural analgesia versus labor analgesia on request: results of a randomized trial.常规分娩硬膜外镇痛与按需分娩镇痛对产妇生活质量的影响:一项随机试验的结果。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Aug;27(8):2027-2033. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1838-z. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
6
Anesthetic and Obstetrical Factors Associated With the Effectiveness of Epidural Analgesia for Labor Pain Relief: An Observational Population-Based Study.与硬膜外镇痛缓解分娩疼痛效果相关的麻醉和产科因素:一项基于人群的观察性研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):109-116. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000517.
7
An economic analysis of patient controlled remifentanil and epidural analgesia as pain relief in labour (RAVEL trial); a randomised controlled trial.瑞芬太尼患者自控镇痛与硬膜外分娩镇痛用于分娩镇痛的经济学分析(RAVEL 试验):一项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0205220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205220. eCollection 2018.
8
Survey of nulliparous parturients' attitudes regarding timing of epidural analgesia initiation.初产妇对硬膜外镇痛起始时间的态度调查。
J Clin Anesth. 2017 Sep;41:106-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
9
Epidural anesthesia: views and outcomes of women in labor in a Nigerian hospital.硬膜外麻醉:尼日利亚一家医院中分娩女性的观点与结局
Ann Afr Med. 2009 Oct-Dec;8(4):250-6. doi: 10.4103/1596-3519.59580.
10
Satisfaction in parturients receiving epidural analgesia after prenatal shared decision-making intervention: a prospective, before-and-after cohort study.产前共同决策干预后接受硬膜外镇痛的产妇的满意度:一项前瞻性、前后队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jul 20;20(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03085-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of acupoint hot compress on relieving pain in primiparous women during the latent phase of the first stage of labour: a study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trial.穴位热敷对初产妇第一产程潜伏期疼痛的缓解作用:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机对照临床试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 May 22;15(5):e094226. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094226.
2
A comparison of childbirth self-efficacy, fear of childbirth, and labor pain intensity between primiparas and multiparas during the latent phase of labor: a cross-sectional study.初产妇与经产妇分娩潜伏期自我效能感、分娩恐惧及分娩疼痛强度比较:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 May 31;24(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06571-3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Variations in use of childbirth interventions in 13 high-income countries: A multinational cross-sectional study.13 个高收入国家分娩干预措施使用情况的差异:一项跨国横断面研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 May 22;17(5):e1003103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003103. eCollection 2020 May.
2
Efficacy of companion-integrated childbirth preparation for childbirth fear, self-efficacy, and maternal support in primigravid women in Malawi.马拉维初产妇分娩恐惧、自我效能和产妇支持中同伴综合分娩准备的效果。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jan 21;20(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2717-5.
3
Relation between Length of Exposure to Epidural Analgesia during Labour and Birth Mode.
.
.
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2022 Feb 19;4:100070. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2022.100070. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation with the injection of pethidine and promethazine in the labor pain reduction: A randomized controlled trial.分娩镇痛中经皮电刺激神经联合哌替啶与异丙嗪注射的疗效:一项随机对照试验
Caspian J Intern Med. 2023 Fall;14(4):628-632. doi: 10.22088/cjim.14.4.628.
5
Factors associated with the intention of pregnant women to give birth with epidural analgesia: a cross-sectional study.与孕妇行硬膜外分娩镇痛意愿相关的因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Aug 22;23(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05887-w.
6
Development and Validation of Peer Relationship Scale for Chinese Community-Dwelling Elderly.中国社区老年人同伴关系量表的编制与验证
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Jun 28;14:889-903. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S311352. eCollection 2021.
分娩时硬膜外镇痛暴露时间与分娩方式的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 15;16(16):2928. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162928.
4
Psychometric aspects of the Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale: data from the HAPPY study.特温特孕期焦虑量表的心理测量学特征:来自 HAPPY 研究的数据。
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2020 Apr;23(2):215-219. doi: 10.1007/s00737-019-00974-4. Epub 2019 May 2.
5
Pharmacological pain relief and fear of childbirth in low risk women; secondary analysis of the RAVEL study.低危产妇的药物性分娩镇痛与分娩恐惧:RAVEL 研究的二次分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Aug 25;18(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1986-8.
6
Causes and outcomes in studies of fear of childbirth: A systematic review.分娩恐惧研究中的原因和结果:系统评价。
Women Birth. 2019 Apr;32(2):99-111. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
7
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.硬膜外镇痛与非硬膜外镇痛或无镇痛用于分娩疼痛管理的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5(5):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4.
8
The effect of epidural education on Primigravid Women's decision to request epidural analgesia: a cross-sectional study.硬膜外麻醉教育对初产妇要求硬膜外镇痛的决策的影响:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 3;18(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1766-5.
9
Creating a positive perception of childbirth experience: systematic review and meta-analysis of prenatal and intrapartum interventions.营造积极的分娩体验感知:产前和产时干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Reprod Health. 2018 May 2;15(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0511-x.
10
The nature of labour pain: An updated review of the literature.分娩疼痛的本质:文献综述的更新。
Women Birth. 2019 Feb;32(1):28-38. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Apr 22.