Suppr超能文献

英国成年人的健康素养水平:使用健康素养问卷(HLQ)的两个领域进行的横断面调查。

Health literacy levels of British adults: a cross-sectional survey using two domains of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ).

机构信息

School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):1819. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09727-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A person's health literacy determines whether they are able to make appropriate health decisions and are able to follow treatment instructions. This is important because low health literacy is associated with mortality and extra costs to the healthcare system. Our aim was to describe the health literacy levels of British adults using a nationally representative population survey, and show how health literacy levels vary by population characteristics.

METHODS

A population based cross-sectional survey including questions from two domains from the Health Literacy Questionnaire™: 1) Understanding health information well enough to know what to do, and 2) Ability to actively engage with health care providers. Both domains are made up of 5 Likert style questions with 5 levels ranging from 'cannot do or always difficult' (1) to 'always easy' (5). The survey was conducted by NatCen in Britain (2018) as part of the annual British Social Attitudes survey. We used weighted descriptive analyses and regression to explore the relationship between population characteristics and health literacy. Weighted analyses were used to ensure the sample was representative of the British population.

RESULTS

A total of 2309 responded to the questionnaire. The mean score for 'understanding information' was 3.98 (95% CI: 3.94, 4.02) and for 'ability to engage' was 3.83 (95% CI: 3.80, 3.87), where 5 is the highest score. 19.4% had some level of difficulty reading and understanding written health information, and 23.2% discussing health concerns with health care providers. The adjusted logistic regression for 'understanding information' showed that those with lower health literacy were more likely to be in the most socially deprived quintile (OR 2.500 95% CI: 1.180, 5.296), have a limiting health condition or disability (OR 4.326 95% CI: 2.494, 7.704), and have no educational qualifications (OR 7.588 95% CI: 3.305, 17.422). This was similar for the 'ability to engage' domain.

CONCLUSIONS

This study described the distribution of health literacy levels for the British population in 2018. Interventions to improve health literacy will best be targeted at those with lower levels of education, those living in the most deprived areas, and those with a limiting health condition or disability.

摘要

背景

一个人的健康素养决定了他们是否能够做出适当的健康决策并能够遵循治疗指示。这很重要,因为低健康素养与死亡率和医疗保健系统的额外成本有关。我们的目的是使用具有代表性的全国性人口调查来描述英国成年人的健康素养水平,并展示健康素养水平如何因人口特征而异。

方法

这是一项基于人群的横断面调查,其中包括来自 Health Literacy Questionnaire™ 的两个领域的问题:1)足够理解健康信息以了解该做什么,2)与医疗保健提供者积极互动的能力。这两个领域都由 5 个李克特量表问题组成,分为 5 个级别,范围从“无法做到或总是困难”(1)到“总是容易”(5)。该调查由 NatCen 在英国(2018 年)进行,作为年度英国社会态度调查的一部分。我们使用加权描述性分析和回归来探索人口特征与健康素养之间的关系。加权分析用于确保样本能够代表英国人口。

结果

共有 2309 人回答了问卷。“理解信息”的平均得分为 3.98(95%CI:3.94,4.02),“互动能力”的平均得分为 3.83(95%CI:3.80,3.87),其中 5 为最高分。19.4%的人在阅读和理解书面健康信息方面存在一定程度的困难,23.2%的人在与医疗保健提供者讨论健康问题方面存在困难。对于“理解信息”的调整后的逻辑回归显示,那些健康素养较低的人更有可能处于最受社会剥夺的五分位数(OR 2.500 95%CI:1.180,5.296),患有限制健康状况或残疾(OR 4.326 95%CI:2.494,7.704),并且没有教育资格(OR 7.588 95%CI:3.305,17.422)。对于“互动能力”领域也是如此。

结论

本研究描述了 2018 年英国人口健康素养水平的分布。提高健康素养的干预措施最好针对那些教育程度较低、生活在最贫困地区的人群,以及那些患有限制健康状况或残疾的人群。

相似文献

5
Understanding health literacy in men: a cross-sectional survey.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 6;24(1):1804. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19223-0.
6
9
Perceptions of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.
JMIR Infodemiology. 2024 Apr 30;4:e51127. doi: 10.2196/51127.

引用本文的文献

1
Health literacy in healthy adults: A systematic review of recent evidence.
Aten Primaria. 2025 Jul 17;57(11):103300. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2025.103300.
2
Health literacy in Ireland: insights from rural and urban community perspectives.
Health Promot Int. 2025 May 13;40(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf072.
3
Exploring health literacy among Japanese and international university students in Japan: A comparative cross-sectional study.
J Migr Health. 2025 Apr 25;11:100334. doi: 10.1016/j.jmh.2025.100334. eCollection 2025.
4
Health literacy of adults from primary care with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study.
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2025 May 16;59:e20240338. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0338en. eCollection 2025.
6
Health Literacy and Acceptance of COVID-19 Preventive Measures and Vaccination in the European Union: A Scoping Review.
Health Lit Res Pract. 2025 Jan;9(1):e46-e55. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20250219-01. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
7
Readability of paediatric participant information leaflets in research studies.
Pediatr Res. 2025 Feb 22. doi: 10.1038/s41390-025-03943-z.
8
[Measuring health literacy: methods and tools for assessing general health literacy in adults].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Mar;68(3):247-254. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04010-y. Epub 2025 Feb 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Health literacy and primary health care use of ethnic minorities in the Netherlands.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 15;17(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2276-2.
2
German translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ).
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172340. eCollection 2017.
4
Health literacy and adherence to medical treatment in chronic and acute illness: A meta-analysis.
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jul;99(7):1079-1086. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.020. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验