• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑电位揭示了母语为西班牙语的人对阳性和阴性语法性别差异的加工。

Brain potentials reveal differential processing of masculine and feminine grammatical gender in native Spanish speakers.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Centre for Research on Brain, Language, and Music, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Psychophysiology. 2021 Mar;58(3):e13737. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13737. Epub 2020 Dec 2.

DOI:10.1111/psyp.13737
PMID:33263933
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9036832/
Abstract

Studies of Spanish grammatical gender have shown that native speakers exploit gender cues in determiners to facilitate speech processing and are sensitive to gender mismatches. However, past research has not considered attested distributional asymmetries between masculine and feminine gender, collapsing performance on trials with one or the other gender into a single analysis. We use event-related potentials to investigate whether masculine and feminine grammatical gender elicit qualitatively different brain responses. Forty monolingual Spanish speakers read sentences that were well-formed or contained determiner-noun gender violations. Half of the nouns were masculine and the other half were feminine. Consistent with previous research, brain responses varied along a continuum between LAN- and P600-dominant effects for both gender categories. However, results showed that individuals' ERP response dominance (LAN/P600) systematically differed across the two genders: participants who showed a LAN-dominant response to masculine-noun violations were more likely to show a P600 effect in response to feminine-noun violations. Correlations with individual difference measures further revealed that responses to masculine-noun violations were modulated by performance on the AX-CPT, a measure of cognitive control, whereas responses to feminine-noun violations were modulated by lexical knowledge, as indexed by verbal fluency. Together, the results demonstrate that even when processing features of language that belong to the same "natural class," native speakers can exhibit patterns of brain activity attuned to distributional patterns of language use. The inherent variability in native speaker processing is, therefore, an important factor when explaining purported deviations from the "native norm" reported in other types of populations.

摘要

对西班牙语语法性别进行的研究表明,以西班牙语为母语的人会利用限定词中的性别线索来促进言语处理,并且对性别不匹配很敏感。然而,过去的研究并没有考虑到阳性和阴性性别之间已证实的分布不对称性,而是将单一性别的试验表现合并到单一分析中。我们使用事件相关电位来研究阳性和阴性语法性别是否会引起大脑反应的质的不同。四十名以西班牙语为母语的说话者阅读了形式正确或包含限定词-名词性别错误的句子。名词的一半是阳性的,另一半是阴性的。与先前的研究一致,大脑反应在 LAN 和 P600 主导效应之间沿着连续体变化,对于这两个性别类别都是如此。然而,结果表明,个体的 ERP 反应优势(LAN/P600)系统地在两种性别之间存在差异:对阳性名词错误表现出 LAN 主导反应的参与者更有可能对阴性名词错误表现出 P600 效应。与个体差异测量的相关性进一步表明,对阳性名词错误的反应受到 AX-CPT(认知控制的一种衡量标准)的表现的调节,而对阴性名词错误的反应则受到词汇知识的调节,如言语流畅性所显示的那样。总之,这些结果表明,即使在处理属于同一“自然类别”的语言特征时,以西班牙语为母语的人也可以表现出与语言使用分布模式相协调的大脑活动模式。因此,在解释其他类型人群中报告的所谓偏离“母语规范”的情况时,母语者处理的固有可变性是一个重要因素。

相似文献

1
Brain potentials reveal differential processing of masculine and feminine grammatical gender in native Spanish speakers.脑电位揭示了母语为西班牙语的人对阳性和阴性语法性别差异的加工。
Psychophysiology. 2021 Mar;58(3):e13737. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13737. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
2
The nature of morphosyntactic processing during language perception. Evidence from an additional-task study in Spanish and German.语言感知过程中形态句法加工的本质。来自西班牙语和德语附加任务研究的证据。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2019 Sep;143:9-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.06.016. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
3
Is the noun ending a cue to grammatical gender processing? An ERP study on sentences in Italian.名词词尾是语法性属加工的线索吗?一项关于意大利语句子的ERP研究。
Psychophysiology. 2015 Aug;52(8):1019-30. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12429. Epub 2015 Mar 29.
4
Morphosyntax can modulate the N400 component: event related potentials to gender-marked post-nominal adjectives.形态句法能够调节N400成分:对名词后带性标记形容词的事件相关电位。
Neuroimage. 2014 May 1;91:262-72. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.077. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
5
The role of language similarity in processing second language morphosyntax: Evidence from ERPs.语言相似性在二语形态句法加工中的作用:来自 ERP 的证据。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2017 Jul;117:91-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
6
Grammatical gender and number agreement in Spanish: an ERP comparison.西班牙语中的语法性数一致:一项事件相关电位比较研究
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Jan;17(1):137-53. doi: 10.1162/0898929052880101.
7
The Processing of Grammatical Gender Agreement in Brazilian Portuguese: ERP Evidence in Favor of a Single Route.巴西葡萄牙语中语法性数一致的加工:支持单一路径的事件相关电位证据
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Feb;48(1):181-198. doi: 10.1007/s10936-018-9598-z.
8
ERPs reveal individual differences in morphosyntactic processing.事件相关电位揭示了形态句法加工中的个体差异。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Apr;56:289-301. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.02.002. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
9
Robust neurocognitive individual differences in grammatical agreement processing: A latent variable approach.语法一致处理中的稳健神经认知个体差异:潜在变量方法。
Cortex. 2019 Feb;111:210-237. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.10.011. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
10
Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.句子理解过程中句法与语义的相互作用:句法和语义违反相结合的事件相关电位效应
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Aug 15;15(6):883-99. doi: 10.1162/089892903322370807.

引用本文的文献

1
Processing Aspectual Agreement in a Language with Limited Morphological Inflection by Second Language Learners: An ERP Study of Mandarin Chinese.第二语言学习者对形态屈折变化有限的语言中体貌一致关系的加工:一项关于汉语普通话的事件相关电位研究
Brain Sci. 2022 Apr 21;12(5):524. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12050524.
2
Research on bilingualism as discovery science.双语能力作为发现科学的研究。
Brain Lang. 2021 Nov;222:105014. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2021.105014. Epub 2021 Sep 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Interactional context mediates the consequences of bilingualism for language and cognition.互动语境调节了双语对语言和认知的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Jun;46(6):1022-1047. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000770. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
2
Revisiting Masculine and Feminine Grammatical Gender in Spanish: Linguistic, Psycholinguistic, and Neurolinguistic Evidence.重新审视西班牙语中的阳性和阴性语法性别:语言、心理语言学和神经语言学证据
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 5;10:751. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00751. eCollection 2019.
3
Toward a Neurobiologically Plausible Model of Language-Related, Negative Event-Related Potentials.
迈向一个与语言相关的负性事件相关电位的神经生物学合理模型。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 21;10:298. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00298. eCollection 2019.
4
Is the LAN effect in morphosyntactic processing an ERP artifact?形态句法加工中的局域网效应是一种事件相关电位伪迹吗?
Brain Lang. 2019 Apr;191:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
5
Bilingualism reveals fundamental variation in language processing.双语揭示了语言处理过程中的基本差异。
Biling (Camb Engl). 2019 Jan;22(1):200-207. doi: 10.1017/S1366728918000482. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
6
Robust neurocognitive individual differences in grammatical agreement processing: A latent variable approach.语法一致处理中的稳健神经认知个体差异:潜在变量方法。
Cortex. 2019 Feb;111:210-237. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.10.011. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
7
Cognitive control ability mediates prediction costs in monolinguals and bilinguals.认知控制能力在单语者和双语者中介导预测成本。
Cognition. 2018 Jul;176:87-106. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
8
Individual differences in verbal working memory underlie a tradeoff between semantic and structural processing difficulty during language comprehension: An ERP investigation.言语工作记忆中的个体差异是语言理解过程中语义和结构加工难度权衡的基础:一项ERP研究。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Mar;44(3):406-420. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000457. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
9
Experience with code-switching modulates the use of grammatical gender during sentence processing.语码转换的经验会调节句子处理过程中语法性别的使用。
Linguist Approaches Biling. 2017 Feb 4;7(2):163-198. doi: 10.1075/lab.15010.val.
10
How right is left? Handedness modulates neural responses during morphosyntactic processing.何为“左”?利手性在形态句法加工过程中调节神经反应。
Brain Res. 2017 Aug 15;1669:27-43. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 May 26.