Sbardella Angelica, Pugliese Emanuele, Zaccaria Andrea, Scaramozzino Pasquale
Department of Economics and Finance, Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.
ISC-CNR-Institute of Complex Systems, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Entropy (Basel). 2018 Nov 16;20(11):883. doi: 10.3390/e20110883.
Development and growth are complex and tumultuous processes. Modern economic growth theories identify some key determinants of economic growth. However, the relative importance of the determinants remains unknown, and additional variables may help clarify the directions and dimensions of the interactions. The novel stream of literature on economic complexity goes beyond aggregate measures of productive inputs and considers instead a more granular and structural view of the productive possibilities of countries, i.e., their capabilities. Different endowments of capabilities are crucial ingredients in explaining differences in economic performances. In this paper we employ economic fitness, a measure of productive capabilities obtained through complex network techniques. Focusing on the combined roles of fitness and some more traditional drivers of growth-GDP per capita, capital intensity, employment ratio, life expectancy, human capital and total factor productivity-we build a bridge between economic growth theories and the economic complexity literature. Our findings show that fitness plays a crucial role in fostering economic growth and, when it is included in the analysis, can be either complementary to traditional drivers of growth or can completely overshadow them. Notably, for the most complex countries, which have the most diversified export baskets and the largest endowments of capabilities, fitness is complementary to the chosen growth determinants in enhancing economic growth. The empirical findings are in agreement with neoclassical and endogenous growth theories. By contrast, for countries with intermediate and low capability levels, fitness emerges as the key growth driver. This suggests that economic models should account for capabilities; in fact, describing the technological possibilities of countries solely in terms of their production functions may lead to a misinterpretation of the roles of factors.
发展与增长是复杂且动荡的过程。现代经济增长理论确定了经济增长的一些关键决定因素。然而,这些决定因素的相对重要性仍然未知,而且其他变量可能有助于阐明相互作用的方向和维度。关于经济复杂性的新文献流超越了生产投入的总量衡量,而是考虑了各国生产可能性的更细化和结构化观点,即它们的能力。能力的不同禀赋是解释经济表现差异的关键因素。在本文中,我们采用经济适应性,这是一种通过复杂网络技术获得的生产能力衡量指标。聚焦于适应性与一些更传统的增长驱动因素——人均国内生产总值、资本强度、就业率、预期寿命、人力资本和全要素生产率——的共同作用,我们在经济增长理论与经济复杂性文献之间架起了一座桥梁。我们的研究结果表明,适应性在促进经济增长方面发挥着关键作用,并且在纳入分析时,它要么与传统增长驱动因素互补,要么可能完全掩盖它们。值得注意的是,对于那些出口篮子最多样化且能力禀赋最大的最复杂国家,适应性在促进经济增长方面与所选的增长决定因素互补。实证结果与新古典增长理论和内生增长理论一致。相比之下,对于能力水平处于中等和较低的国家,适应性成为关键的增长驱动因素。这表明经济模型应该考虑能力;事实上,仅根据生产函数来描述各国的技术可能性可能会导致对各因素作用的误解。