Mari Emanuela, Fraschetti Angelo, Lausi Giulia, Pizzo Alessandra, Baldi Michela, Paoli Elena, Giannini Anna Maria, Avallone Francesco
Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 1;9(12):3906. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123906.
At the beginning of 2020, a pandemic caused by a new strain of coronavirus occurred. On March 9th, the Italian population was forced to lockdown to prevent the spread of this new virus. This event forced families and cohabitants to spend their entire days and weeks in the same physical space, interacting with partners and children with a very different degree of intimacy than in the earlier situation. The present study investigated the effects of being forced to live together on different family patterns, on various dimensions such as stress, coping strategies, time perception and quality evaluation of cohabitation.
A total sample consisting of 1750 individuals was recruited through a random sample of probability across the Italian country. Due to the lockdown condition, an online questionnaire was set up; several validated scales were chosen, and some open-ended items were included for the thoughts of the participants.
The results showed statistically significant differences between the three family patterns examined.
During the forced period of living together, a positive effect could be inferred as given by the presence of children and the collaborative coping strategies that have been adopted; the results have been discussed according to the literature on the topic.
2020年初,一种新型冠状病毒引发了一场大流行。3月9日,意大利民众被迫封锁,以防止这种新病毒的传播。这一事件迫使家庭成员和同居者在同一物理空间里度过整日整周的时间,与伴侣和孩子互动的亲密程度与之前的情况有很大不同。本研究调查了被迫共同生活对不同家庭模式的影响,涉及压力、应对策略、时间感知和同居质量评估等多个维度。
通过在意大利全国进行概率随机抽样,招募了一个由1750人组成的总样本。由于封锁条件,设置了一份在线问卷;选择了几个经过验证的量表,并纳入了一些开放式问题以了解参与者的想法。
结果显示,所研究的三种家庭模式之间存在统计学上的显著差异。
在被迫共同生活期间,可以推断出孩子的存在以及所采用的协作应对策略产生了积极影响;已根据该主题的文献对结果进行了讨论。