Graduate School of Public Health, Ajou University, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2020 Dec;14(5):267-276. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate studies on the measurement properties of self-reported instruments.
This descriptive review included studies on measurement properties that were reported in Asian Nursing Research over a five-year period from 2016 to September 2020. Nine key measurement properties were reviewed for each study: content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance, reliability, measurement error, criterion validity, hypotheses-testing construct validity, and responsiveness.
The most commonly applied measurement properties were structural validity and internal consistency. However, structural validity using confirmatory factor analysis or item response theory/Rasch analysis needs to be rigorously analyzed and interpreted. None of the studies assessed measurement error and responsiveness.
It is recommended for nursing researchers to assess measurement properties beyond structural validity and internal consistency using more rigorous methodologies.
本研究旨在评估自我报告工具测量特性的研究。
本描述性综述纳入了 2016 年至 2020 年 9 月在《亚洲护理研究》上发表的五年内有关测量特性的研究。每个研究都评估了 9 个关键的测量特性:内容效度、结构效度、内部一致性、跨文化有效性/测量不变性、可靠性、测量误差、效标关联效度、假设检验构念效度和反应度。
最常应用的测量特性是结构效度和内部一致性。然而,使用验证性因子分析或项目反应理论/拉什分析的结构效度需要进行严格的分析和解释。没有研究评估测量误差和反应度。
建议护理研究人员使用更严格的方法评估结构效度和内部一致性以外的测量特性。