Kokkoris Michail D
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Marketing, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 9;11:571462. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.571462. eCollection 2020.
The current research investigates maximizers' responses to restrictions of choice freedom during lockdown in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Having as a starting point the assumption that for maximizers choice is constitutive of identity, this research proposes that maximizing is associated with search for existential meaning in life. In turn, maximizers' propensity to search for meaning is associated with a higher susceptibility to experience reactance when their freedom of choice is restricted, which is further associated with higher engagement in online shopping during lockdown presumably as a means to combat reactance and restore choice freedom. Using the lockdown in spring 2020 as a naturalistic context to study consumer responses to restrictions of choice freedom, results of an online study in Austria support these predictions. These findings advance a view of maximizers as "lay existentialists," who view choice as a meaning-making device that is tightly linked to their sense of identity. As a result, when their choice freedom is threatened, maximizers may respond with higher reactance and engage in restorative actions.
当前的研究调查了在新冠疫情封锁期间,最大化者对选择自由受限的反应。本研究以这样一个假设为出发点,即对于最大化者而言,选择构成了身份认同,进而提出最大化与在生活中寻找存在意义相关联。反过来,最大化者寻找意义的倾向与当他们的选择自由受到限制时更高的逆反体验易感性相关,而这又进一步与封锁期间更高的在线购物参与度相关,大概是作为一种对抗逆反并恢复选择自由的手段。以2020年春季的封锁作为研究消费者对选择自由受限反应的自然情境,奥地利一项在线研究的结果支持了这些预测。这些发现推进了一种将最大化者视为“世俗存在主义者”的观点,他们将选择视为一种与他们的身份认同感紧密相连的意义构建工具。因此,当他们的选择自由受到威胁时,最大化者可能会以更高的逆反情绪做出反应并采取恢复行动。