Mary Kathryn Poole (
Aviva A. Musicus is a postdoctoral research fellow in the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Dec;39(12):2144-2152. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01102.
By feeding more than thirty million schoolchildren daily, the National School Lunch Program's food offerings substantially influence a contributing factor to climate change: US food production methods. Modifying school lunch nutrition standards could be a policy strategy to reduce climate change while promoting human health. To estimate how school lunches could be adjusted to encourage both outcomes, we compared the composition of school lunches with the EAT-Lancet Commission's healthy reference diet science-based benchmarks for reducing food system impacts on climate change. Analyzing more than 5,000 lunches served in the US during school year 2014-15, we found that they exceeded EAT-Lancet targets for dairy, fruit, refined grains, red meat, and starchy vegetables while containing insufficient whole grains, legumes, vegetables, and nuts. In addition, estimated food costs were higher for school lunches than for lunches meeting EAT-Lancet targets. Our findings suggest that redesigning school lunches could provide high-quality nutrition while benefiting the environment and reducing food costs.
通过每天为三千多万学童提供膳食,国家学校午餐计划的供餐内容极大地影响了气候变化的一个促成因素:美国的食品生产方式。调整学校午餐营养标准可能是一项既能减少气候变化又能促进人类健康的政策策略。为了估算学校午餐如何进行调整以鼓励这两种结果,我们将学校午餐的构成与 EAT-柳叶刀委员会的健康参考饮食进行了比较,该饮食以基于科学的基准来减少食品系统对气候变化的影响。在分析了 2014-15 学年在美国供应的 5000 多份午餐后,我们发现它们超过了 EAT-柳叶刀委员会针对乳制品、水果、精制谷物、红色肉类和淀粉类蔬菜的目标,而全谷物、豆类、蔬菜和坚果的含量不足。此外,与符合 EAT-柳叶刀委员会目标的午餐相比,学校午餐的估计食品成本更高。我们的研究结果表明,重新设计学校午餐可以在提供高质量营养的同时有益于环境并降低食品成本。