• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双眼注视下双眼视敏度差异对青光眼患者点单眼视敏度的影响。

Effect of Sensitivity Disparity Between the Two Eyes on Pointwise Monocular Sensitivity Under Binocular Viewing in Patients With Glaucoma.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine.

Clinical Research Center, Kindai University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

J Glaucoma. 2021 Jan 1;30(1):37-43. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001675.

DOI:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001675
PMID:33290308
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7774818/
Abstract

PRCIS

A difference between monocular sensitivities measured with and without occlusion was observed in glaucoma. Monocular sensitivity without occlusion could have been affected differently by binocular interaction due to the sensitivity disparity between both eyes.

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of sensitivity disparity between both eyes on visual field results under binocular viewing in glaucoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirteen glaucoma patients tested by Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) and imo were reviewed retrospectively. On the basis of their HFA results, we defined the eye with a better HFA-MD as "the better eye" and the fellow eye with a worse HFA-MD as "the worse eye." Depending on the pointwise pattern deviation (PD) of both eyes, all evaluated test points were classified into 4 groups: normal PD in both eyes (N/N), normal PD in the better eye but abnormal in the worse eye (N/A), abnormal PD in the better eye but normal in the worse eye (A/N), and abnormal PD in both eyes (A/A). Using imo, which can measure sensitivity with and without occluding the nontested eye, the better eye's sensitivities with and without occlusion were compared in each group using weighted data. The weight was derived by applying the inverse probability weighting.

RESULTS

Monocular sensitivity without occlusion was higher than that with occlusion in N/N (P<0.01) and the opposite was observed in A/A (P<0.05). No significant sensitivity difference between both conditions was seen in N/A or A/N. In N/A, the points showing a higher sensitivity without occlusion decreased as the sensitivity difference between both eyes increased.

CONCLUSIONS

A difference between sensitivities measured with and without occlusion was observed in glaucoma. Owing to the sensitivity disparity between both eyes, monocular sensitivity without occlusion could have been affected differently by binocular interaction.

摘要

PRCIS

在青光眼患者中,观察到用和不用眼罩测量的单眼敏感性之间存在差异。由于双眼之间的敏感性差异,单眼无眼罩敏感性可能因双眼相互作用而受到不同影响。

目的

研究双眼敏感性差异对视功能检查在青光眼患者双眼检查中的影响。

材料和方法

回顾性分析 13 例经 Humphrey 视野分析仪(HFA)和 imo 检查的青光眼患者。根据 HFA 结果,我们将 MD 较好的眼定义为“优势眼”,MD 较差的眼定义为“劣势眼”。根据双眼的点值模式偏差(PD),将所有评估的测试点分为 4 组:双眼 PD 正常(N/N)、优势眼 PD 正常而劣势眼 PD 异常(N/A)、优势眼 PD 异常而劣势眼 PD 正常(A/N)和双眼 PD 异常(A/A)。使用 imo,它可以测量未遮盖眼的敏感度,我们对每组患者分别采用加权数据比较双眼优势眼的遮盖和不遮盖时的敏感度。权重是通过应用逆概率加权得出的。

结果

在 N/N 组中,双眼 PD 正常的患者单眼不遮盖时的敏感性高于遮盖时(P<0.01),而在 A/A 组中则相反(P<0.05)。在 N/A 或 A/N 组中,两种条件下的敏感性没有显著差异。在 N/A 组中,随着双眼敏感性差异的增大,不遮盖时敏感性更高的点减少。

结论

在青光眼患者中,用和不用眼罩测量的单眼敏感性之间存在差异。由于双眼之间的敏感性差异,单眼无眼罩敏感性可能因双眼相互作用而受到不同影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ca6/7774818/d3eafa96dde5/ijg-30-37-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ca6/7774818/d6fcba35d615/ijg-30-37-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ca6/7774818/c5015c4866b1/ijg-30-37-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ca6/7774818/8b922fa163df/ijg-30-37-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ca6/7774818/d3eafa96dde5/ijg-30-37-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ca6/7774818/d6fcba35d615/ijg-30-37-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ca6/7774818/c5015c4866b1/ijg-30-37-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ca6/7774818/8b922fa163df/ijg-30-37-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ca6/7774818/d3eafa96dde5/ijg-30-37-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Sensitivity Disparity Between the Two Eyes on Pointwise Monocular Sensitivity Under Binocular Viewing in Patients With Glaucoma.双眼注视下双眼视敏度差异对青光眼患者点单眼视敏度的影响。
J Glaucoma. 2021 Jan 1;30(1):37-43. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001675.
2
Central Visual Field Sensitivity With and Without Background Light Given to the Nontested Fellow Eye in Glaucoma Patients.青光眼患者非测试对侧眼在有和无背景光下的中央视野敏感度。
J Glaucoma. 2021 Jun 1;30(6):537-544. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001764.
3
Comparison of central visual sensitivity between monocular and binocular testing in advanced glaucoma patients using imo perimetry.利用 imo 视野计比较晚期青光眼患者单眼和双眼测试的中心视觉敏感度。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;104(11):1258-1534. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315251. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
4
Comparison of monocular sensitivities measured with and without occlusion using the head-mounted perimeter imo.使用 imo 头戴式周边视野计测量未遮盖和遮盖时的单眼敏感度比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 17;14(1):e0210691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210691. eCollection 2019.
5
Visual Field Testing with Head-Mounted Perimeter 'imo'.使用头戴式视野计“imo”进行视野测试。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 26;11(8):e0161974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161974. eCollection 2016.
6
Test-retest repeatability of the imo binocular random single-eye test and Humphrey monocular test in patients with glaucoma.青光眼患者 imo 双眼随机单眼测试和 Humphrey 单眼测试的重测重复性。
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2023 Sep;67(5):578-589. doi: 10.1007/s10384-023-01007-5. Epub 2023 Jul 1.
7
Patients have two eyes!: binocular versus better eye visual field indices.患者有两只眼睛!:双眼与更好眼视野指数。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Sep 1;52(9):7007-11. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7643.
8
Predicting binocular visual field sensitivity from monocular visual field results.从单眼视野结果预测双眼视野敏感度
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Jul;41(8):2212-21.
9
[Comparison between binocular and monocular reading ability and its relation with central visual field sensitivity in glaucoma patients].[青光眼患者双眼与单眼阅读能力的比较及其与中心视野敏感度的关系]
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2013 Nov;117(11):925-30.
10
Comparison of rates of change between binocular and monocular visual fields.双眼和单眼视野变化率的比较。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Jan 6;56(1):451-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15577.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of visual function within the central 10 degrees using IMOvifa™ 24plus (1-2).使用IM Ovifa™ 24plus评估中央10度范围内的视觉功能(1 - 2)。
PLoS One. 2025 May 12;20(5):e0323630. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323630. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of IMO vifa24plus(1-2) and Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2.IMO vifa24plus(1-2)与汉弗莱视野分析仪24-2的比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 30;19:301-307. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S506059. eCollection 2025.
3
Reference Database for a Novel Binocular Visual Function Perimeter: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
新型双眼视觉功能视野计参考数据库:一项随机临床试验。
Ophthalmol Sci. 2024 Jul 20;4(6):100583. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100583. eCollection 2024 Nov-Dec.
4
Measurement of paracentral stereopsis using a new method with the binocular open perimeter imovifa in normal adults.采用双眼开放周边像差仪新方法测量正常成年人的旁中心立体视。
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul;68(4):355-361. doi: 10.1007/s10384-024-01066-2. Epub 2024 May 18.