End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.
Te Arai Palliative Care and End of Life Research Group, School of Nursing, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Palliat Med. 2021 Feb;35(2):369-388. doi: 10.1177/0269216320972036. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
Palliative care is insufficiently integrated in the continuum of care for older people. It is unclear to what extent healthcare policy for older people includes elements of palliative care and thus supports its integration.
(1) To develop a reference framework for identifying palliative care contents in policy documents; (2) to determine inclusion of palliative care in public policy documents on healthcare for older people in 13 rapidly ageing countries.
Directed documentary analysis of public policy documents (legislation, policies/strategies, guidelines, white papers) on healthcare for older people. Using existing literature, we developed a reference framework and data extraction form assessing 10 criteria of palliative care inclusion. Country experts identified documents and extracted data.
Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, England, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Singapore, Slovenia, South Korea, Spain.
Of 139 identified documents, 50 met inclusion criteria. The most frequently addressed palliative care elements were coordination and continuity of care (12 countries), communication and care planning, care for family, and ethical and legal aspects (11 countries). Documents in 10 countries explicitly mentioned palliative care, nine addressed symptom management, eight mentioned end-of-life care, and five referred to existing palliative care strategies (out of nine that had them).
Health care policies for older people need revising to include reference to end-of-life care and dying and ensure linkage to existing national or regional palliative care strategies. The strong policy focus on care coordination and continuity in policies for older people is an opportunity window for palliative care advocacy.
姑息治疗在老年人护理连续体中整合不足。目前尚不清楚老年人保健政策在多大程度上包含姑息治疗内容,因此无法支持姑息治疗的整合。
(1) 制定一个参考框架,以确定政策文件中的姑息治疗内容;(2) 确定 13 个快速老龄化国家老年人保健公共政策文件中包含姑息治疗的程度。
对老年人保健公共政策文件(立法、政策/策略、指南、白皮书)进行有针对性的文献分析。我们利用现有文献,制定了一个参考框架和数据提取表格,用于评估姑息治疗纳入的 10 个标准。国家专家确定文件并提取数据。
奥地利、比利时、加拿大、捷克共和国、英格兰、日本、墨西哥、荷兰、新西兰、新加坡、斯洛文尼亚、韩国、西班牙。
在确定的 139 份文件中,有 50 份符合纳入标准。最常涉及的姑息治疗内容包括协调和连续性护理(12 个国家)、沟通和护理计划、家庭护理以及伦理和法律方面(11 个国家)。10 个国家的文件明确提到姑息治疗,9 个国家提到症状管理,8 个国家提到临终关怀,5 个国家提到现有的姑息治疗策略(9 个有此类策略的国家中)。
需要修订老年人保健政策,提及临终关怀和死亡,并确保与现有的国家或地区姑息治疗策略相联系。政策高度关注老年人护理的协调和连续性,为姑息治疗倡导提供了机会窗口。