• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于社区的社交距离措施对减轻土耳其新冠疫情传播的有效性。

The Effectiveness of Community-based Social Distancing for Mitigating the Spread of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Turkey.

作者信息

Durmuş Hasan, Gökler Mehmet Enes, Metintaş Selma

机构信息

Dörtyol District Health Directorate, Hatay, Turkey.

Department of Public Health, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Prev Med Public Health. 2020 Nov;53(6):397-404. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.20.381. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

DOI:10.3961/jpmph.20.381
PMID:33296579
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7733747/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to demonstrate the effects of community-based social distancing interventions after the first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) case in Turkey on the course of the pandemic and to determine the number of prevented cases.

METHODS

In this ecological study, the interventions implemented in response to the first COVID-19 cases in Turkey were evaluated and the effect of the interventions was demonstrated by calculating the effective reproduction number (Rt) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coro navirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) when people complied with community-based social distancing rules.

RESULTS

Google mobility scores decreased by an average of 36.33±22.41 points (range, 2.60 to 84.80) and a median of 43.80 points (interquartile range [IQR], 24.90 to 50.25). The interventions caused the calculated Rt to decrease to 1.88 (95% confidence interval, 1.87 to 1.89). The median growth rate was 19.90% (IQR, 10.90 to 53.90). A positive correlation was found between Google mobility data and Rt (r=0.783; p<0.001). The expected number of cases if the growth rate had not changed was predicted according to Google mobility categories, and it was estimated to be 1 381 922 in total. Thus, community-based interventions were estimated to have prevented 1 299 593 people from being infected.

CONCLUSIONS

Community-based social distancing interventions significantly decreased the Rt of COVID-19 by reducing human mobility, and thereby prevented many people from becoming infected. Another important result of this study is that it shows health policy-makers that data on human mobility in the community obtained via mobile phones can be a guide for measures to be taken.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是证明土耳其出现首例2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)病例后基于社区的社交距离干预措施对疫情发展过程的影响,并确定预防病例的数量。

方法

在这项生态学研究中,对土耳其针对首例COVID-19病例实施的干预措施进行了评估,并通过计算当人们遵守基于社区的社交距离规则时严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的有效繁殖数(Rt)来证明干预措施的效果。

结果

谷歌移动性得分平均下降了36.33±22.41分(范围为2.60至84.80),中位数下降了43.80分(四分位间距[IQR]为24.90至50.25)。这些干预措施使计算出的Rt降至1.88(95%置信区间为1.87至1.89)。中位数增长率为19.90%(IQR为10.90至53.90)。发现谷歌移动性数据与Rt之间存在正相关(r = 0.783;p<0.001)。根据谷歌移动性类别预测了如果增长率没有变化时的预期病例数,估计总数为1381922例。因此,估计基于社区的干预措施预防了1299593人感染。

结论

基于社区的社交距离干预措施通过减少人员流动显著降低了COVID-19的Rt,从而防止了许多人被感染。本研究的另一个重要结果是,它向卫生政策制定者表明,通过手机获得的社区人员流动数据可以作为采取措施的指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89f7/7733747/f2a270f433e0/jpmph-20-381f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89f7/7733747/d6ba6dcc8dd2/jpmph-20-381f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89f7/7733747/f2a270f433e0/jpmph-20-381f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89f7/7733747/d6ba6dcc8dd2/jpmph-20-381f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89f7/7733747/f2a270f433e0/jpmph-20-381f2.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effectiveness of Community-based Social Distancing for Mitigating the Spread of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Turkey.基于社区的社交距离措施对减轻土耳其新冠疫情传播的有效性。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2020 Nov;53(6):397-404. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.20.381. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
2
Mathematical assessment of the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on curtailing the 2019 novel Coronavirus.数学评估非药物干预措施对遏制 2019 年新型冠状病毒的影响。
Math Biosci. 2020 Jul;325:108364. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2020.108364. Epub 2020 May 1.
3
Social Media as an Early Proxy for Social Distancing Indicated by the COVID-19 Reproduction Number: Observational Study.社交媒体作为 COVID-19 繁殖数所指示的社交距离的早期代理指标:观察性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Oct 20;6(4):e21340. doi: 10.2196/21340.
4
No Place Like Home: Cross-National Data Analysis of the Efficacy of Social Distancing During the COVID-19 Pandemic.无处可逃:新冠疫情期间社交隔离有效性的跨国数据分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 May 28;6(2):e19862. doi: 10.2196/19862.
5
Mathematical modeling of the transmission of SARS-CoV-2-Evaluating the impact of isolation in São Paulo State (Brazil) and lockdown in Spain associated with protective measures on the epidemic of CoViD-19.SARS-CoV-2 传播的数学建模-评估与保护措施相关的巴西圣保罗州隔离和西班牙封锁对 CoViD-19 疫情的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 15;16(6):e0252271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252271. eCollection 2021.
6
Impact of social distancing on early SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the United States.社交隔离对美国早期 SARS-CoV-2 传播的影响。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2022 Sep;69(6):746-756. doi: 10.1111/zph.12909. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
7
Low-impact social distancing interventions to mitigate local epidemics of SARS-CoV-2.低影响社会疏离干预措施以减轻 SARS-CoV-2 的局部流行。
Microbes Infect. 2020 Nov-Dec;22(10):611-616. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
8
Mask-wearing and control of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the USA: a cross-sectional study.戴口罩与美国 SARS-CoV-2 传播的控制:一项横断面研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Mar;3(3):e148-e157. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30293-4. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
9
Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.物理隔离、口罩和眼部防护预防 SARS-CoV-2 和 COVID-19 的人际传播:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2020 Jun 27;395(10242):1973-1987. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
10
Effectiveness of different types and levels of social distancing measures: a scoping review of global evidence from earlier stage of COVID-19 pandemic.不同类型和级别的社交隔离措施的效果:COVID-19 大流行早期全球证据的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 11;12(4):e053938. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053938.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of social distancing measures and lockdowns for reducing transmission of COVID-19 in non-healthcare, community-based settings.社交距离措施和封锁措施在减少非医疗、社区环境中的 COVID-19 传播方面的效果。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2023 Oct 9;381(2257):20230132. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2023.0132. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
2
The effect of social movements on COVID-19 case increases and death in Turkey.社会运动对土耳其新冠疫情病例增加及死亡情况的影响。
Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2023 Mar-Apr;20:101260. doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2023.101260. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
3
Predisposing, Enabling, and Reinforcing Factors of COVID-19 Prevention Behavior in Indonesia: A Mixed-methods Study.

本文引用的文献

1
The Epidemiological Characteristics of an Outbreak of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Diseases (COVID-19) - China, 2020.2019新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情的流行病学特征 - 中国,2020年
China CDC Wkly. 2020 Feb 21;2(8):113-122.
2
Nowcasting and Forecasting the Spread of COVID-19 and Healthcare Demand in Turkey, a Modeling Study.实时预测和预测 COVID-19 在土耳其的传播和医疗保健需求:一项建模研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jan 20;8:575145. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.575145. eCollection 2020.
3
Effects of social distancing and isolation on epidemic spreading modeled via dynamical density functional theory.
印度尼西亚 COVID-19 预防行为的促成因素、促进因素和强化因素:混合方法研究。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2023 Jan;56(1):21-30. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.22.340. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
4
Global Experiences of Community Responses to COVID-19: A Systematic Literature Review.全球应对 COVID-19 社区响应的经验:系统文献回顾。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 19;10:907732. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.907732. eCollection 2022.
5
In-depth Correlation Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Effective Reproduction Number and Mobility Patterns: Three Groups of Countries.深入分析 SARS-CoV-2 的有效繁殖数和流动模式:三组国家。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2022 Mar;55(2):134-143. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.21.522. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
6
The effect of different COVID-19 public health restrictions on mobility: A systematic review.不同 COVID-19 公共卫生限制措施对流动性的影响:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 8;16(12):e0260919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260919. eCollection 2021.
基于动力密度泛函理论对社交隔离与传染病传播关系的建模研究
Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 4;11(1):5576. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19024-0.
4
Effect of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions on Transmission of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2, South Korea, 2020.2020 年韩国非药物干预措施对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒传播的影响。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;26(10):2406-2410. doi: 10.3201/eid2610.201886. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
5
To mask or not to mask: Modeling the potential for face mask use by the general public to curtail the COVID-19 pandemic.戴口罩还是不戴口罩:模拟公众使用口罩遏制新冠疫情的可能性。
Infect Dis Model. 2020 Apr 21;5:293-308. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2020.04.001. eCollection 2020.
6
The role of community-wide wearing of face mask for control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic due to SARS-CoV-2.社区范围内佩戴口罩在控制 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行中的作用,由严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)引发。
J Infect. 2020 Jul;81(1):107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.024. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
7
Impact assessment of non-pharmaceutical interventions against coronavirus disease 2019 and influenza in Hong Kong: an observational study.非药物干预措施对 2019 年冠状病毒病和流感在香港的影响评估:一项观察性研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e279-e288. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30090-6. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
8
COVID-19 outbreak control, example of ministry of health of Turkey.新冠疫情防控:土耳其卫生部的范例。
Turk J Med Sci. 2020 Apr 21;50(SI-1):489-494. doi: 10.3906/sag-2004-187.
9
Public Health Interventions for COVID-19: Emerging Evidence and Implications for an Evolving Public Health Crisis.针对2019冠状病毒病的公共卫生干预措施:新出现的证据及其对不断演变的公共卫生危机的影响
JAMA. 2020 May 19;323(19):1908-1909. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5910.
10
Association of Public Health Interventions With the Epidemiology of the COVID-19 Outbreak in Wuhan, China.公共卫生干预措施与中国武汉 COVID-19 疫情流行病学的关联。
JAMA. 2020 May 19;323(19):1915-1923. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6130.