• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解决结构性不平等问题,是在新冠疫情期间及之后确保药物流产护理远程医疗公平可及的必要步骤。

Addressing Structural Inequities, a Necessary Step Toward Ensuring Equitable Access to Telehealth for Medication Abortion Care During and Post COVID-19.

作者信息

Thompson Terri-Ann, Northcraft Dana, Carrión Fabiola

机构信息

Ibis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, MA, United States.

Expanding Medication Abortion Access (EMAA) Project, Washington, DC, United States.

出版信息

Front Glob Womens Health. 2022 Mar 17;3:805767. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.805767. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2022.805767
PMID:35368993
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8967978/
Abstract

Telehealth, one of the newest health innovations, has been promoted as a tool to enhance access to health care services in ways that center patient needs. However, integrating telehealth within an inequitable health system undermines its potential. This perspective highlights policies and practices that foster structural inequities and names their impact on the use and acceptability of telehealth for medication abortion among specific communities of color. Communities of color have a higher prevalence of abortion use but face many barriers, including financial and geographic barriers, to abortion access. Preliminary evidence on telehealth for medication abortion shows that it is highly acceptable, accommodating of patient needs, and may allow patients to access abortion care at earlier gestational ages. However, evidence during the COVID-19 pandemic shows that utilization of telehealth is lower among communities of color. We describe how systemic barriers, including regulations on or laws banning telehealth for medication abortion, disinvestments in digital access, and restrictions on public insurance coverage, could perpetuate lower utilization of telehealth for medication abortion care among communities of color. We call for systems changes that will remove these barriers and make this health care innovation available to all who may desire it.

摘要

远程医疗是最新的医疗创新之一,它被宣传为一种以患者需求为核心,增强医疗服务可及性的工具。然而,将远程医疗整合到不公平的医疗体系中会削弱其潜力。这一观点突出了助长结构性不平等的政策和做法,并指出了它们对特定有色人种社区使用远程医疗进行药物流产的影响以及远程医疗在这些社区的可接受性。有色人种社区的堕胎率较高,但在获得堕胎服务方面面临许多障碍,包括经济和地理障碍。关于远程医疗用于药物流产的初步证据表明,它非常容易被接受,能满足患者需求,并且可能使患者在更早的孕周获得堕胎护理。然而,新冠疫情期间的证据表明,有色人种社区对远程医疗的利用率较低。我们描述了系统性障碍,包括对药物流产远程医疗的监管或法律禁令、对数字接入的投资不足以及对公共保险覆盖范围的限制,这些如何可能使有色人种社区对药物流产护理的远程医疗利用率持续较低。我们呼吁进行系统性变革,消除这些障碍,让所有有需求的人都能获得这项医疗创新。

相似文献

1
Addressing Structural Inequities, a Necessary Step Toward Ensuring Equitable Access to Telehealth for Medication Abortion Care During and Post COVID-19.解决结构性不平等问题,是在新冠疫情期间及之后确保药物流产护理远程医疗公平可及的必要步骤。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2022 Mar 17;3:805767. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.805767. eCollection 2022.
2
The Role of Telehealth in Promoting Equitable Abortion Access in the United States: Spatial Analysis.远程医疗在美国促进公平堕胎获取中的作用:空间分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Nov 7;9:e45671. doi: 10.2196/45671.
3
Virtual Clinic Telehealth Abortion Services in the United States One Year After Dobbs: Landscape Review.美国多布斯案一年后虚拟诊所远程医疗堕胎服务:景观回顾。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 5;26:e50749. doi: 10.2196/50749.
4
Rapid Transition to Telehealth and the Digital Divide: Implications for Primary Care Access and Equity in a Post-COVID Era.快速向远程医疗和数字鸿沟过渡:在后 COVID-19 时代对初级保健可及性和公平性的影响。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):340-368. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12509. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
5
Federal, state, and institutional barriers to the expansion of medication and telemedicine abortion services in Ohio, Kentucky, and West Virginia during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,俄亥俄州、肯塔基州和西弗吉尼亚州在扩大药物和远程医疗堕胎服务方面面临联邦、州和机构障碍。
Contraception. 2021 Jul;104(1):111-116. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.020. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
6
The Provision of Abortion Care via Telehealth in the United States: A Rapid Review.美国通过远程医疗提供堕胎护理:快速审查。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2023 Nov-Dec;68(6):744-758. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13586. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
7
Telehealth for Addressing Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Needs During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond: A Hybrid Telemedicine-Community Accompaniment Model for Abortion and Contraception Services in Pakistan.在新冠疫情期间及之后满足性与生殖健康及权利需求的远程医疗:巴基斯坦堕胎与避孕服务的远程医疗-社区陪伴混合模式
Front Glob Womens Health. 2021 Jul 26;2:705262. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.705262. eCollection 2021.
8
Adoption of no-test and telehealth medication abortion care among independent abortion providers in response to COVID-19.独立堕胎服务提供者为应对新冠疫情而采用无检测和远程医疗药物流产护理。
Contracept X. 2020 Nov 21;2:100049. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100049. eCollection 2020.
9
Pricing of medication abortion in the United States, 2021-2023.2021-2023 年美国药物流产的定价。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;56(3):282-294. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12280. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
10
Remote Delivery in Reproductive Health Care: Operation of Direct-to-Patient Telehealth Medication Abortion Services in Diverse Settings.远程生殖保健服务:不同环境下直接面向患者的远程医疗药物流产服务的运作。
Ann Fam Med. 2022 Jul-Aug;20(4):336-342. doi: 10.1370/afm.2821. Epub 2022 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
HIV Infections and Prevention in Women.女性中的艾滋病毒感染与预防
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jun 1;68(2):159-163. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000939. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
2
Perceptions and experiences with two no-test direct-to-patient telehealth medication abortion regimens in the USA: an exploratory study with mifepristone and misoprostol and misoprostol-only regimens.美国两种无需检测的直接面向患者的远程医疗药物流产方案的认知与体验:一项关于米非司酮与米索前列醇联合方案及单纯米索前列醇方案的探索性研究。
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Oct 26;2(2):e000808. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000808. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Pricing of medication abortion in the United States, 2021-2023.2021-2023 年美国药物流产的定价。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;56(3):282-294. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12280. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
4
Delays in Obtaining Abortion and Miscarriage Care Among Pregnant Persons in New York State During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The CAP Study.新冠疫情期间纽约州孕妇获得堕胎和流产护理的延迟情况:CAP研究
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024 Jan 17;5(1):30-39. doi: 10.1089/whr.2023.0128. eCollection 2024.
5
The Role of Telehealth in Promoting Equitable Abortion Access in the United States: Spatial Analysis.远程医疗在美国促进公平堕胎获取中的作用:空间分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Nov 7;9:e45671. doi: 10.2196/45671.
6
Estimation of Multiyear Consequences for Abortion Access in Georgia Under a Law Limiting Abortion to Early Pregnancy.在限制堕胎仅限于早孕的法律下,对格鲁吉亚堕胎机会的多年后果进行估计。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e231598. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1598.
7
"": a qualitative, community-led medication abortion study with Black and Latinx Women in Georgia, USA.“”: 一项在美国佐治亚州针对黑人和拉丁裔女性的定性、社区主导的药物流产研究。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2022 Dec;30(1):2129686. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2129686.
8
Patient and provider experiences using a site-to-site telehealth model for medication abortion.患者和医疗服务提供者使用点对点远程医疗模式进行药物流产的体验。
Mhealth. 2022 Oct 30;8:32. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-22-12. eCollection 2022.
9
Severely Restricting Abortion Threatens Equitable Health Outcomes for People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus.严格限制堕胎会威胁到艾滋病毒感染者公平的健康结果。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 6;76(1):152-154. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac721.

本文引用的文献

1
Reconsidering Reimbursement for Medical Interpreters in the Era of COVID-19.重新审视新冠疫情时代医疗口译员的报销问题。
JAMA Health Forum. 2020 Oct 1;1(10):e201240. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.1240.
2
Disparities in telephone and video telehealth engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间电话和视频远程医疗服务参与情况的差异。
JAMIA Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(3):ooab056. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab056. eCollection 2021 Jul.
3
The legacy of structural racism: Associations between historic redlining, current mortgage lending, and health.结构性种族主义的遗留问题:历史上的红线划定、当前的抵押贷款与健康之间的关联。
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Apr 20;14:100793. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100793. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
"It was close enough, but it wasn't close enough": A qualitative exploration of the impact of direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion on access to abortion care.“差一点,但又差一点”:直接面向患者的远程医疗流产对堕胎护理可及性影响的定性研究。
Contraception. 2021 Jul;104(1):67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.028. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
5
Expansion of a direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion service in the United States and experience during the COVID-19 pandemic.美国直接面向患者的远程医疗堕胎服务的扩展及 COVID-19 大流行期间的经验。
Contraception. 2021 Jul;104(1):43-48. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.019. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
6
Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of no-test medical abortion (termination of pregnancy) provided via telemedicine: a national cohort study.远程医疗提供的无检测药物流产(终止妊娠)的有效性、安全性和可接受性:一项全国性队列研究。
BJOG. 2021 Aug;128(9):1464-1474. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16668. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
7
Trends in the Use of Telehealth During the Emergence of the COVID-19 Pandemic - United States, January-March 2020.COVID-19 大流行期间远程医疗使用趋势 - 美国,2020 年 1 月至 3 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Oct 30;69(43):1595-1599. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6943a3.
8
Disparities in the use of telehealth at the onset of the COVID-19 public health emergency.在 COVID-19 公共卫生紧急事件开始时,远程医疗的使用存在差异。
J Telemed Telecare. 2023 Jan;29(1):3-9. doi: 10.1177/1357633X20963893. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
9
Are higher unintended pregnancy rates among minorities a result of disparate access to contraception?少数族裔中较高的意外怀孕率是避孕措施获取机会不平等的结果吗?
Contracept Reprod Med. 2020 Oct 1;5:16. doi: 10.1186/s40834-020-00118-5. eCollection 2020.
10
State and federal abortion restrictions increase risk of COVID-19 exposure by mandating unnecessary clinic visits.州和联邦的堕胎限制通过强制要求不必要的诊所就诊,增加了 COVID-19 暴露的风险。
Contraception. 2020 Dec;102(6):385-391. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.08.017. Epub 2020 Sep 6.