Stanley Barbara, Martínez-Alés Gonzalo, Gratch Ilana, Rizk Mina, Galfalvy Hanga, Choo Tse-Hwei, Mann J John
Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, United States; New York State Psychiatric Institute, United States.
Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, United States.
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Jan;133:32-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.12.012. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
While suicide-specific psychosocial interventions often teach coping skills to suicidal individuals, little is known about the strategies that individuals intuitively use on their own to cope with suicidal ideation in everyday life.
The present study used Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) to examine the effectiveness of specific coping strategies individuals use naturally to reduce the intensity of suicidal thinking.
Fifty participants endorsing suicidal ideation with co-morbid mood disorder and borderline personality disorder completed one week of EMA. Real-time use, perceived effectiveness of 7 common coping strategies and intensity of suicidal ideation were assessed at 6 epochs (i.e., timepoints) each day.
Participants reported using an average of 4 coping strategies per epoch. Factor analysis (FA) (exploratory followed by confirmatory FA) identified two coping factors: one that included distraction/positive activity-based strategies (i.e., keeping busy, socializing, positive thinking, and doing something good for self) and a second that contained mindfulness-oriented strategies (i.e., finding perspective, calming self, and sitting with feelings until they pass). Although participants perceived all coping strategies as effective, only strategies in the first factor, distraction/positive activity-oriented strategies, lowered the intensity of suicidal thoughts in everyday life. Furthermore, baseline suicidal ideation was inversely related to overall use of coping strategies and particularly use of coping strategies that were found to lead to lowered suicidal ideation.
Distraction/positive activity based strategies are helpful in decreasing suicidal ideation in the short-term. These findings can help clinicians advise patients about strategies to use to cope with suicidal thoughts to prevent acting on them in a crisis and they also have the potential to inform development of psychosocial interventions to prevent suicide.
虽然针对自杀的社会心理干预通常会向有自杀倾向的个体传授应对技巧,但对于个体在日常生活中凭直觉自行运用的应对自杀念头的策略却知之甚少。
本研究采用生态瞬时评估(EMA)来检验个体自然运用的特定应对策略在降低自杀念头强度方面的有效性。
五十名患有共病情绪障碍和边缘性人格障碍且有自杀念头的参与者完成了为期一周的生态瞬时评估。每天在6个时间点(即时段)评估7种常见应对策略的实时使用情况、感知有效性以及自杀念头的强度。
参与者报告每个时段平均使用4种应对策略。因子分析(FA)(先进行探索性分析,随后进行验证性FA)确定了两个应对因子:一个包括分散注意力/基于积极活动的策略(即保持忙碌、社交、积极思考以及为自己做好事),另一个包含以正念为导向的策略(即找到看待问题的角度、使自己平静下来以及直面情绪直至情绪过去)。尽管参与者认为所有应对策略都有效,但只有第一个因子中的策略,即分散注意力/以积极活动为导向的策略,在日常生活中降低了自杀念头的强度。此外,基线自杀念头与应对策略的总体使用情况,尤其是与那些被发现能降低自杀念头的应对策略的使用情况呈负相关。
基于分散注意力/积极活动的策略在短期内有助于减少自杀念头。这些发现可以帮助临床医生就应对自杀念头的策略向患者提供建议,以防止他们在危机中付诸行动,并且它们还有可能为预防自杀的社会心理干预措施的制定提供参考。